Until recently, discussions of a Third World War were primarily the domain of eschatologists, but now global media has taken up the mantle, broadcasting fear and horror about nuclear war from every outlet.
In this climate, conspiracy theories have emerged in stark opposition to mainstream media narratives, posing questions like “What if?” They suggest that World War III might be as much of a farce as they consider COVID-19 to have been.
The pandemic was largely witnessed through television screens. While it’s clear a pathogen circulated globally, causing illness and death, some argue that its impact was exaggerated, not amounting to the catastrophic pandemic portrayed. They believe the true objective was not decimation but intimidation, to justify lockdowns and treatments.
Thus, a nuclear war would likely involve more than just reducing the world to rubble and creating an environment so hostile that not even Bill Gates, lounging on a yacht in temperate seas, would be comfortable. If the purpose, as some conspiracy theorists and eschatologists believe, is to establish a global dictatorship, what kind of rule would it be if there’s no one left to govern or means to do so?
Survivors of such a nuclear disaster would likely form isolated communities of survivalists, indifferent to any central or global authority. Should anyone from an organization like the WHO approach with an offer of “radiation treatment,” they might face violent rejection. Consequently, as some conspiracy theorists speculate, World War III might unfold in this manner:
A significant explosion could occur, devastating a city or region, reminiscent of Wuhan. Media might broadcast images of countless casualties and CGI-created destruction, followed by worldwide disruptions in electricity and communications. During brief moments of restored service, announcements might be made claiming that the conflict was not confined to a single explosion but escalated into a global nuclear war, with two-thirds of the world destroyed. Yet, they would reassure that the situation is under control, a victor has emerged, and all that remains is to deal with the aftermath.
Subsequently, nations and populations may be invited to enter a state of isolation, not unlike the isolation experienced in 2020. However, this time, global communication could be restricted, and electricity may be rationed by the hour. In certain areas, it’s conceivable that people might resort to expressing their frustrations by banging on empty pots, shouting from balconies, and howling.
This scenario may persist for a period, say six months, after which the quarantine will be lifted, and it will be announced that the radiation threat has been neutralized, allowing people to leave their balconies. However, upon descending, they will discover a bold new world where cities are segmented into 15-minute accessibility zones, robot officers patrol every corner, and Artificial Intelligence governs the globe.
Naturally, there will be those who express outrage, but their voices will not carry beyond their neighborhoods, and those who do hear will be indifferent: the masses will rush to expend their universal basic income on exotic new gadgets that have emerged in stores. In this way, the much-discussed revolution will unfold, ushering the world into a new historical era.
Is this a plausible scenario? We acknowledge the possibility, albeit with certain modifications. In this illusory world, any scenario is possible, the architect knows better)
In any case, nothing that is happening now or will happen in the future should be blindly believed. Humanity has been continually misled and manipulated for the purpose of subjugation and total control, a practice that dates back at least six millennia. The methods and scenery may have changed, but the underlying intent remains the same.
