Connect with us

Aliens & UFO's

U.S. UFO encounter reports published

The American publication has published real reports by U.S. Navy pilots about a meeting with unidentified flying objects over the past few years. Journalists note that the documents themselves contain some oddities, and for some signs, a significant proportion of such cases were classified.

In total, The War Zone announces the receipt of eight documents marked “unclassified” and “for official use only.” Seven of them are related to events that occurred with F / A-18E / F Super Hornet aircraft (carrier-based fighter aircraft of the American naval aviation) from 2013 to 2014 in the airspace off the coast of Virginia and North Carolina. The eighth document describes the incident that occurred in 2019, and the plane included the Grower EA-18G (a US Navy’s super-hornet carrier-based electronic warfare aircraft) flying in another part of the Atlantic Ocean off the coast of Maryland. It is reported that these are the only messages stored in the centralized aviation incident database WAMHRS.

UFO and the mysterious ship

June 27, 2013 F / A-18F from the 11th fighter squadron, flying from the naval base of Oceana (Virginia), met with a “white aircraft in shape and size approximately corresponding to a drone or rocket.” The pilots observed the object when it passed to their right at an altitude of about 5000 meters. An unknown plane was gaining altitude and had a visible exhaust trace.

At the same time, neither Super Hornet nor Oceana recorded the radar track of the aircraft. The commander of the Atlantic fighter wing (the wing is the next level of command after the squadron) “contacted the operational units, but no one reported such operations.” The Cape’s Navy Airspace Control Center in Virginia reported that “no aircraft have been identified or flagged in this zone.”

The Navy did not issue any notices to flight personnel (NOTAM) and did not set time limits for flights (TFR) based on this hazard report, but issued internal notifications to tactical aviation units, air traffic controllers and unmanned aerial vehicle operators of potential dangers associated with unauthorized or uncoordinated actions of drones.

A few months later, on November 18, 2013, the F / A-18E Super Hornet from the 143rd squadron discovered an unidentified object flying at an altitude of about 3700 meters at a speed of Mach 0.1.

“The aircraft had a wingspan of about 5 feet (one and a half meters – approx. Ed.) And was painted white without other distinguishing features,”

– said the pilot, who visually observed the object for an hour.

According to the report, the US Navy concluded that this facility was an unmanned aerial system, but the special departments were again unable to establish the operator of the device. As in the previous case, the command limited itself to issuing internal warnings.

It is very curious that, as stated in the document, “during the incident, surface movement was weak, only one commercial fishing trawler and one unidentified US naval vessel headed south,” and it was not possible to establish which ship it was. “. “It is not entirely clear how the Navy was able to determine that one of their ships acted on the surface in the same area, but could not figure out which ship it was,” the author of the article notes.

Flying suitcase

March 26, 2014 Super Hornet from the 106th squadron, flying out of the Oceana base, discovered a possible radar track at an altitude of about 5800 meters, the object was moving at a speed of 0.1 Mach. The wing pilot did not see the object on the radar, so there was a debate between the pilots over whether the track could be displayed erroneously due to strong winds.

“The unknown plane turned out to be small, about the size of a suitcase, and silver,” the report said. The pilot could only go within three hundred meters of him and could not identify the device. After that, the pilots lost sight of the object and were no longer able to restore visual contact.

Ground controls did not again record an unknown aircraft. At the same time, the squadron commander noted that coastal systems cannot notice an object of this size if it does not give “friend or foe” signals, which is a “serious security problem”.

“I feel that this is only a matter of time before one of our F / A-18 aircraft collides in the air with an unidentified UAS [unmanned aerial system],” he added.

Neither NOTAM nor TFR were issued either, although internal warnings followed.

Spherical UFOs and Dog Fights

On April 24, 2014, another “super hornet” from the 11th squadron collided with several “unidentified airborne devices” (UADs) while taking off from the Oceana Naval Airfield. The crew initially discovered two such objects on the radar, one at an altitude of 3700 meters, and the other at an altitude of 4600 meters. Both objects were almost motionless at Mach 0.0. Then the presence of the devices was confirmed using infrared sight (ATFLIR).

During the study of the first pair of UAD in the ATFLIR “field of view”, apparently, two more objects passed at high speed. On the radar of the plane, two moving vehicles did not appear.

It was again not possible to identify objects and establish their operators. The end of this report is similar to the previous ones – it is again said that “a mid-air collision is only a matter of time.” The command again did not impose flight restrictions by issuing internal notifications.

On the same day, April 24, 2014, two more F / A-18Fs (11th Squadron) made radar contact with another unidentified vehicle in the same area during a training air battle (known as dogfighting, “dog fighting”) . Both aircraft fixed the object on radars – the UFO hovered at an altitude of about 3,500 meters and did not move. No visual contact has been established.

On April 27, 2014, for the third time in five days, the F / A-18F crew from the 11th squadron, departing from Oceana base, reported a collision with an unknown airborne device.

The pilot describes a “meeting in the air with an object like a balloon.” This is the first document that gives any substantial description of stationary or almost stationary devices from previous reports.

Otherwise, this report is the most “Spartan” in the sense of details. As in the rest of the cases, US Navy officials sent out many internal warnings.

On February 13, 2019, almost five years after the last collision with an unidentified object recorded in the U.S. Navy database, the crew of the EA-18G Growler combat aircraft from the 23rd Air Test Squadron, flying from the Patuxent River Naval Airfield in Maryland , visually noticed what was called a “red weather balloon” at a height of 8,200 meters in the report.

Neither the military nor the civilian control services were aware of any planned balloon activities. The report said the Navy was unable to identify the individuals or organizations responsible for lifting the balloon. In response to the incident, various internal warnings were issued.

Do you hide other meetings with UFOs?

Recall that this is only officially recorded in the database messages about meetings of naval aviation with UFOs. Apparently, in fact, there were more such meetings, given the previous reports of the Navy pilots, official and unofficial, that several such incidents occurred over the Atlantic in 2014-2015. But there are no reports on that period in the database.

The War Zone received a copy of the report of another incident involving F / A-18E from the 106th squadron on March 13, 2018. Then the crew saw on the radar four separate unknown objects off the coast of North Carolina. According to the report, all the devices moved at a speed of approximately 0.1 Mach at an altitude of 5000 to 6700 meters. The pilot visually identified one of them at an altitude of 6000 meters. The device, according to him, was a drone in the form of a quadrocopter about a meter wide. The objects, as the pilot reported, barely moved and were scattered over an area 40-50 miles wide. The nearest vehicle was 15 miles from the only boat seen in the area.

The report does not contain a serial number, which raises questions about where the document could eventually be sent and what official actions the Navy could take in this regard. According to the publication, the squadron transmitted the report to the fighter wing, and it was to be expected that the document would be sent from there to the database, but it does not seem to have happened. This seems strange given that the squadron commander has repeatedly stated the security threat posed by these UFOs.

The War Zone suggests that for some reason, these reports subsequently began to be transmitted through separate or even secret channels.

In this regard, the publication recalls the incident with the Tik-Tak flying object, which was radar and visually observed in November 2004 near the coast of Mexico and the United States in the Pacific Ocean by the strike group of the American aircraft carrier Nimitz. According to one of the pilots, the object looked like a smooth white bright ellipsoid (or a shape close to an ellipsoid) measuring 9 to 14 m in length. Following the incident, the AUG chief intelligence officer sent a full report to the US Navy 3rd Fleet Intelligence Agency, headquartered in San Diego, California, via secure email. For reasons that remain unexplained, the senior intelligence officer refused to send the report further upstairs and deleted the email.

It is also curious that almost half of the reported incidents occurred with the aircraft of one squadron, the 11th. Given that several squadrons are based at the Oceana airfield (and even more in the vicinity), this may indicate that not all units officially reported these meetings. In addition, US Air Force pilots often train in the same area, but they do not indicate anything like this in their reports.

The publication notes that the incidents with UFOs may have a completely earthly reason: allegedly, a potential enemy could send aircraft into the training zone of the American military aviation in order to collect intelligence data.

Recall that at the end of April, the Pentagon published three videos that capture “unidentified phenomena”. One of them was recorded in November 2004, the other two in January 2015, according to the agency’s website. All these videos in 2007 and 2017 without the permission of the US Department of Defense were in the public domain. Their authenticity was confirmed by the US Navy. Note that we are talking about incidents not described in the article The War Zone.


Aliens & UFO's

NASA research: UFO sightings since ancient times

The study was authored by Richard B. Stoters, a scientist at NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Research. In 2007, Stoters wrote the article “Unidentified Flying Objects in Ancient Times.”

Stoters combined a historical and scientific approach to ancient reports of what are today called Unidentified Flying Objects (UFOs).

He analyzed dozens of UFO accounts of ancient historians – his focus was on Roman and Greek historians. Stoters cites many descriptions of objects in the sky over 2,000 years ago.

Stoters has done a great job and NASA has published his research.

Stoters studied UFO sightings only from Rome and Greece in his research, but it is worth remembering that there are stories of flying objects throughout the ancient world.

In scriptures such as the Bible or the Mahabharata, there are descriptions of flying objects that were seen by ancient people (by the way, NASA engineer Joseph Blumrich reconstructed the vehicle that the prophet Ezekiel saw).

When we talk about current sightings of modern UFOs, it is worth remembering that UFOs have been observed from the very beginning of civilization.

Although UFOs differ in morphology and behavior, there are still common patterns. At close range, UFOs appear as discs or cigar-shaped objects, including vertical cylinders surrounded by “clouds” and associated with smaller discs.

Depending on the point from which the object was observed, their shapes can be similar or even identical:

When viewed from the front, the disc looks round, although from the edge it looks elliptical or oblong.

Colors during the day are usually described as silver or gray, and at night as red or multi-colored lights.

Sizes range from one meter to hundreds of meters.

UFOs are usually silent and make no sound in flight.

They can be seen in the air or on the ground, hovering or stationary, or moving through the sky or moving randomly.

Sometimes they suddenly appear or disappear.

Continue Reading

Aliens & UFO's

A mysterious object near the moon and a Disc-shaped UFO hit the news

A video was posted on the Internet, which clearly shows how an unidentified object flew over the surface of the Earth satellite, and then quickly disappeared from view. 

In a strange video, which was filmed on July 25 in the city of Benzin by Marek Slade, it is perfectly visible how a UFO flew at incredible speed right in front of the moon. An incomprehensible object flew along a horizontal line and until the very moment of its disappearance its flight path did not change.

Users immediately began to comment on this video. It is worth noting that opinions were divided over what exactly can be seen on the video posted on the network. Some users suggested that they managed to take pictures of the International Space Station, which swept in front of the satellite at great speed. It could also be an artificial satellite. Another part of the users agreed that this is indeed a UFO, which belongs to an unknown alien civilization.

There were also comments that it could have been a fairly large bird that flew right between the moon and the camera at the time of filming the video. If it were actually some kind of flying device near the moon, then when it reached the dark side of the satellite, it would immediately disappear from the field of view. But this did not happen and the object was clearly visible even on the dark side.

The video was posted on the Internet by the author of a fairly popular YouTube channel, which discusses a variety of conspiracy theories that are relevant today. At the moment, more than 1000 users have watched the video. In the comments, one can observe a very heated debate as to what it really was.

Disc UFO hits NBC’s evening news

The August 3, 2020 issue of NBC Nightly News caught our attention by focusing on how the Navajo Indians are fighting a water crisis amid the coronavirus pandemic, but after watching this issue we found something else there – a disc-shaped UFO flying by at that very moment, when the Indian shaman cried out to the gods.

Issue Summary: “Cynthia McFadden of NBC News takes a closer look at the water crisis affecting the Navajo people in Arizona, where at least 30 percent of the houses on the reservation have no running water.”

Notice how the UFO “rips open” the cloud as it flies out of it.

Continue Reading

Aliens & UFO's

What hackers were looking for on the Vatican servers

As the Associated Press reports on July 29, 2020, the Vatican and the Catholic Diocese of Hong Kong have been targeted by Chinese hackers believed to be in the service of the Chinese government. There was no immediate comment at the Vatican and it was only now, after a report by The New York Times, that everything became known.

When it comes to cyber espionage, the Vatican may not seem like an obvious target. However, it has now been targeted by hackers who appear to be linked to China. 

China and the Vatican are expected to begin negotiations in September to renew an agreement on control of the Catholic Church in China. Chinese leaders may look an edge – inside knowledge about how the Holy See was planning to approach the negotiating table, according to a report released by Recorded Future, a company that investigates threats in cyberspace. 

The report states that the hackers were targeted the Vatican, the Diocese of Hong Kong and its head, the de facto representative of the Pope in China. In addition, according to the report, China used malware to gain access to the Vatican ‘s internal networks.

China’s Foreign Ministry generally denies any involvement in the incident, calling the report “baseless speculation.” The attacks continued from May until at least July 21st. They included, in particular, an explicit phishing attempt with documents from the Vatican State Secretariat, as it were, sent to the head of the Vatican mission in Hong Kong.

Phishing is a type of Internet fraud, the purpose of which is to gain access to confidential user data. This is achieved by sending mass emails on behalf of popular brands, as well as private messages within various services, for example, on behalf of banks or within social networks.

The letter often contains a direct link to a site that looks indistinguishable from the real one, or to a site with a redirect. After the user lands on a fake page, the scammers try, using various psychological methods, to induce the user to enter their username and password on the fake page, which they use to access a specific site, which allows the fraudsters to gain access to accounts and bank accounts.

According to a report released by the American service Recorded Future, which tracks cyberattacks, the hacking attempt was carried out by a group called RedDelta and began back in May with the possible aim of September negotiations to renew the interim agreement on bishop appointments.

China is home to about 12 million Catholics, who are divided into two groups: one part belongs to the government-backed Chinese Catholic “patriotic church association”, which is outside the power of the Pope, the second, a very small part – is something like a “catacomb church” devoted to the Pope. The Chinese authorities are persecuting the parishioners and, especially, the priests of this church.

In 2018, in order to unite the flock between China and the Vatican, a sort of agreement was signed on the joint appointment of bishops, which would suit both parties. In September 2020, the agreement was to be renewed, therefore, as the official Vatican said – “The proposed invasion of RedDelta will give Beijing an understanding of the negotiating position of the Holy See ahead of the resumption of the deal in September 2020.” But is it really so?

In fact, China and the Vatican are kind of twin brothers. China, which has dramatically gained strength over the past decades, did this exclusively through the efforts of globalists, who for 30 years pumped money and technology there.

On the other hand, although there is no direct evidence that the Vatican is, as it were, the spiritual leader of globalism, nevertheless, there is enough circumstantial evidence and there is even an opinion that the Antichrist will be appointed by the Vatican, which wants to destroy Israel, capture Jerusalem and plant there for the kingdom of his world king.

Therefore, it is hard to believe in some kind of confrontation between the Vatican and the PRC, especially since the essence of the issue is, as it were, feeding a flock of a couple of million sheep, which for China is nothing. Hence, one must think that the Chinese hackers decided to gain access to the computers of the main bosses, containing information that was not shared with Beijing for one reason or another. But what information could this be? And what is the reason for this urgency?

The Vatican undoubtedly keeps many secrets and with at least one eye to look at its secret libraries, many would like to at least have a quick peek at at the names of volumes. However, there are big doubts that the antediluvian manuscripts were translated into digital and placed on the server under the Pope’s bed, so rather there is some current data.

But what kind of data could there be that interested either the Chinese, or someone who hacked into the Vatican disguised himself as Chinese hackers? What kind of data is there, of course, only the Vatican and the hackers who hacked it know for sure, but, as everyone else knows, in observations with infrared telescopes, the Vatican is at the forefront:

Therefore, given the ever-growing rumors about the Earth entering the asteroid cloud, which are trailing behind the Planet X that entered the solar system, one can think that the information of this plan has become the target of the hackers. That is, information about when to run to the bunker and escape. Xi or some other of his comrades might not have been told, so they decided to clarify everything on their own. But no one will tell us what the hackers have dug up, so we will have to wait and see.

Continue Reading