In the 1950s, a French visitor named Bovi observed small animals in the Great Pyramid’s garbage cans that had inadvertently entered and perished. Their bodies appeared unusual, showing no odor or signs of decay. Intrigued, Bovi inspected the remains and discovered they had dehydrated and mummified, despite the room’s humidity.
Assuming the shape of the pyramid was crucial, he constructed a model of the Great Pyramid with a base side measuring 90 centimeters, oriented precisely north. Inside, at one-third the height, he placed a recently deceased cat. Days later, the cat was mummified, with no decay evident. This sparked numerous studies into what’s sometimes called the “pyramid effect.”
Subsequent research on the “pyramid effect” has yielded inconsistent results. Claims of “sensational discoveries” have been made and later debunked. Alleged effects include benefits to plant seeds, microbial activity suppression, oil viscosity reduction, and even alterations in time. While some claims border on fantasy or fabrication, others merit attention. A significant limitation of these studies is their deviation from standard scientific research protocols, which ensure experimental integrity and accurate result analysis.
More rigorous studies suggest that the pyramid’s shape does indeed influence biological, chemical, and physical processes, a phenomenon not accounted for by contemporary physics. The most pronounced effects occur at key geometric points: the base’s center, the pyramid’s center, and the apex. Models with edge inclinations matching the Great Pyramid and precise cardinal orientation show the greatest effects, leading to the hypothesis that the pyramid’s shape may interact with space-time itself.
A crucial aspect to consider is that only the pyramid shape (according to geometric definitions) produces the desired effect, not cones or other structures.
The precise alignment of the Great Pyramid with the cardinal points underscores the importance of this orientation to its builders. This alignment is not merely for the worship of the Sun, which rises due east only on the equinoxes, contrary to some Egyptologists’ interpretations. There must be a practical reason behind it.
Evidence suggests that the so-called “pyramid effect” is significantly stronger when a pyramid, whether an actual monument or an experimental model, is aligned with the cardinal points. This effect intensifies during sunrise and sunset at the solstices. Although these findings await final verification, the apparent correlation lends a practical significance to the Great Pyramid’s precise orientation.
The exact impact on living organisms and inanimate objects and fields remains largely unknown. Additionally, it does not conform to our known frameworks of interaction in several aspects. However, this does not hinder the investigation of its patterns, which will eventually help to ascertain the nature of this impact.
Setting aside such “exotics” and considering only the Earth’s seismic energy utilization in the Great Pyramid, the reference to geographical coordinates could have a practical rationale. The vibrations of the Earth’s crust, influenced by the gravitational pull of celestial bodies, and the seismic vibrations detected and intensified by the pyramid, are evidently dependent on the positions of these celestial bodies. Furthermore, the Earth’s rotation on its axis introduces an expected anisotropy (non-uniformity in different directions) in the fluctuations of its crust. This anisotropy is inherently linked to the planet’s axis of rotation, aligning with the primary geographical directions of north and south.
For the builders of the Great Pyramid, achieving the utmost efficiency in harnessing seismic energy or the “pyramid effect” necessitated precise alignment of their edifice. This precision was sought not for religious purposes but for practical objectives.
Conducting experiments directly within the Egyptian pyramids is exceedingly challenging – official research is strictly prohibited, and the scope for amateur “underground” initiatives is severely restricted by the need for secrecy. To date, only preliminary experiments have been conducted, primarily to determine if there is a viable subject for research, yet these initial efforts have yielded promising results.
Experiments are still in their infancy, with plans to test a range of purported effects. Time will reveal which effects are substantiated and what new discoveries emerge. The quest to unravel the mysteries of the ancient pyramids is pushing the boundaries of contemporary scientific knowledge, which is intriguing. This is hardly surprising if one considers the hypothesis that the pyramids were constructed by a civilization that not only had advanced technology but also a deeper understanding of universal laws.
Researchers have observed that despite the striking similarities among the most technologically sophisticated pyramids, significant differences exist, particularly in their internal structures. No two internal structures are identical, with variations in chamber locations, dimensions, and the angles of their faces. Yet, there is an unexpected uniformity in the size of the so-called corridors and passages—they are identical across all pyramids. These corridors and passages, while not suited for human movement, are crafted with exceptional precision, suggesting they may have functioned as waveguides, similar to those in antenna systems.
This observation supports the theory that the pyramids might have functioned as antennas, possibly for receiving signals of an unknown nature from the depths of space.
But modern antennas can work not only to receive signals, but also to emit them. That is, pyramids can be not only antennas, but also emitters – devices that do not receive signals from deep space, but on the contrary, send information or energy to another planet. And this version is quite consistent with the fact that at the same time the pyramid extracts this energy from the bowels of the Earth.
Be that as it may, the largest ancient pyramids of Egypt (and possibly also Mexico and China) may not be cult-religious structures or tombs at all, but technical devices..
Instead of conclusions
The analysis of certain technical aspects of the ancient pyramids suggests they are not indicative of a primitive society from the dawn of known civilizations, but rather of highly advanced technologies, some of which may surpass even today’s capabilities. Regrettably, historians have not acknowledged such an advanced civilization in Earth’s past, often overlooking the evidence that is apparent to technologists and confining themselves to speculative theories.
Our forebears harbored no doubts about the existence of an exceedingly advanced civilization on Earth in antiquity, referring to its members as “gods” who lived among humans. They left behind a wealth of information about that era in legends and traditions, which contemporary historians have largely dismissed as mere myths and fantasies.
Yet, the tangible facts increasingly support not the conventional historical narrative taught in schools, but the veracity of ancient legends and traditions. If this is the case, then the history of human civilization is vastly different from the version presented in educational textbooks.
One can choose to overlook the evident, or alternatively, confront the “inconvenient” facts disregarded by historians and archaeologists and endeavor to reconstruct a very different, “alternative” history of humanity that perhaps aligns more closely with reality.
