Connect with us
The history of the clan who addicted the United States to drugs 86 The history of the clan who addicted the United States to drugs 87


The history of the clan who addicted the United States to drugs

A serious opioid crisis is brewing in the United States and is already recognized as a national problem. 142 people die here every day from an overdose of opioids. Many become addicted and addicted to prescription pain relievers. One of the most popular is OxyContin, manufactured by Purdue Pharma. It is owned by the Sackler family, renowned philanthropists and art trustees. We figure out how they managed to amass a multibillion-dollar fortune and hook the whole country on “legal drugs”.

On February 9, 2019, the famous American photo artist Nan Goldin held a protest in the Guggenheim, one of the most popular museums in New York, where, among other things, her work is exhibited.

On Saturday night, Goldin and activists from her PAIN (Prescription Addiction Intervention Now) movement walked into the museum and dropped a stack of prescription flyers for 80-milligram OxyContin tablets from the top floor. There were different quotes on them, for example, one of them: “If you do not control the use of OxyContin, then with a high degree of probability it will cause addiction. So how much will our sales grow? “

OxyContin is a popular prescription opioid pain reliever in the United States that is twice the strength of morphine. It is produced by Purdue Pharma, owned by the Sacklers, one of the wealthiest American families. Since 1996, when the drug went on sale, more than 200 thousand people have died from overdoses in the United States.

Of course, not all deaths are associated with OxyContin or other pain relievers – many of the victims, starting with opioids, switched to other drugs – for example, heroin. But it was Sackler’s Purdue Pharma that “destigmatized” the use of opioids in medicine and took the lead in the long-acting pain reliever market.

Three years ago, the doctor prescribed Nan Goldin OxyContin. She took the drug strictly according to the prescription, but soon could not do without it, increasing the dose and switching to drugs. It took ten months to free myself from the addiction. After that, she declared “war” on the Sackler family and decided at all costs to ensure that they were brought to justice.

“When I got out of treatment, I learned about drug addicts who were dying from my medicine, OxyContin. I learned that the Sacklers, whose surname I know from museums and galleries, is responsible for these deaths. This family invented, advertised and supplied OxyContin. I decided to bring them out of the shadows and bring them to justice, ”says Goldin’s petition on

We will tell you what the business of the Sackler family is like, how they managed to build an empire based on pain, and why clouds are gathering around them now.


Family business

Once upon a time there were three brothers – Arthur, Mortimer and Raymond. Descendants of Jewish immigrants, they grew up in Brooklyn during the Great Depression and quickly discovered not only a talent for medicine, but also a strong entrepreneurial grip.

Arthur began his career as a copywriter for an agency that specialized in advertising medical products. As The New Yorker notes, he showed Don Draper’s flair for marketing – he soon became the owner of the agency and revolutionized the drug promotion industry.

Arthur Sackler realized that advertising should be directed not only to patients, but also to doctors, so he began to place ads in specialized medical journals and publications. Realizing that physicians are influenced by colleagues, he won over the most influential of them to leave positive reviews on his product. In parallel with the advertising business, Sackler began publishing the Medical Tribune newspaper, whose audience was about 600 thousand doctors.

Arthur Sackler was not shy about any methods: in the 1950s, he released an advertisement for the new antibiotic Sigmamycin, which was accompanied by pictures of doctors’ business cards and the caption: “More and more doctors are choosing Sigmamycin as therapy.”

In 1959, an investigative reporter for The Saturday Review tried to contact some of the doctors whose names were in the advertisements and found out that they never existed. It is also known that he paid $ 300 thousand to the head of one of the departments of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Henry Welch so that he could, for example, casually mention the names of certain medicines in his speeches.

In 1952, Arthur and his brothers bought out Purdue Frederic, a company that researched, developed and licensed drugs and health products.

At the same time, Arthur Sackler became the first advertiser in history who managed to convince the editorial staff of the Journal of the American Medical Association (the weekly international medical scientific journal, the most read medical journal in the world. – Esquire) to include in one of the issues a color advertising brochure.

In the 1960s, the pharmaceutical company Roche hired Arthur to develop a marketing strategy for a new tranquilizer, Valium. It was not an easy task because the drug worked in much the same way as Librium, another Roche product already on the market.

And here’s what Sackler came up with: Unlike Librium, which was prescribed as a remedy for anxiety and anxiety, he decided to position Valium as a cure for “emotional stress”, which, according to advertising, was the true cause of a number of diseases – heartburn, diseases related to with problems with the gastrointestinal tract, insomnia, restless legs syndrome.

The campaign was such a success that Valium became America’s # 1 prescription drug and Arthur Sackler became one of the first Americans to enter the Medical Advertising Hall of Fame.

Arthur Sackler

One of the first of its own developments Purdue Frederic, which became interested in the American authorities, was a drug against high cholesterol, which had many side effects, including hair loss. In the early 1960s, Tennessee Senator Estes Kefover, who headed the subcommittee responsible for the pharmaceutical industry, became interested in the brothers’ activities.

In his notes, he wrote: “The Sackler empire is a full-cycle production – they can develop a new drug at their facility, conduct clinical testing and receive positive feedback from the hospitals with which they cooperate.

They design an advertising campaign and promote their product by publishing articles in medical newspapers and magazines that they own or have connections with. ” In January 1962, Arthur Sackler was summoned to Washington to testify, but not a single senator was able to offend him or convict him of lying – the businessman was ready for any questions and answered them sharply and confidently.

When asked if he knew about the side effects of the drug, he calmly stated: “Better to have thin hair, so thick coronary arteries.”

In May 1987, Arthur Sackler died of a heart attack, and his brothers Mortimer and Raymond bought his stake in Purdue Frederic for $ 22.4 million. The company was subsequently renamed Purdue Pharma and moved to Connecticut.

The branch of the family tree that goes from Arthur Sackler has since split from the heirs of Mortimer and Raymond and did not take part in the management of the company. Arthur’s daughter Elisaber Sackler, a feminist art historian and one of the trustees of the Brooklyn Museum, in her interviews firmly distanced herself from Purdue Pharma and called her relatives’ firm “morally disgusting.”

She even spoke publicly in support of Nan Goldin: “I admire Nan Goldin’s courage and her drive to make a difference. My father, Arthur M. Sackler, died in 1987, even before OxyContin, and his interest in Purdue Frederick was sold to the brothers a few months later.

None of his direct descendants have ever owned Purdue shares or benefited from the sale of OxyContin. I share the anger of those who oppose the abuse of power that harm or endanger people’s lives. “

Liz O. Baylen / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Empire of Pain

In the 1970s, opioids were not used in medicine in the United States, and so-called “opioidophobia” existed among doctors. There was a war in Vietnam, soldiers en masse were addicted first to soft drugs, then to opioids, and then to heroin, which they began to produce clandestinely.

After the end of the war, the soldiers returned to their homeland, and the United States faced a real heroin epidemic. Despite the stigmatization of opioids, opioid-based pain relievers have been widely used in hospice services to care for dying patients.

A turning point in Purdue’s history came when a London physician working for Cecil Saunders (a celebrated British nurse and social worker, considered the founder of the hospice movement) asked the company’s UK arm to develop a delayed-release morphine pill.

So in 1987, the innovative pain reliever MS-Contin appeared on the US market, which became a real hit in the treatment of cancer patients. At the same time, there was a discussion among the medical profession about the need to consider the use of opioids in the treatment of non-cancerous diseases, which can be equally debilitating for the patient.

Scientific articles have appeared that long-term opioid therapy is safe and effective if the patient does not have a history of drug addiction. The reputable New England Journal of Medicine even published an open letter in 1980 stating that the risk of addiction with long-term opioid use is less than 1%. The author then disavowed the material, but it was picked up by other specialized publications, and the theses from it were quoted more than 600 times.

Despite its popularity, MC-Contin could not become the pain reliever No. 1 – in large part due to the fact that there was some prejudice towards morphine. “People heard ‘morphine’ and said, hey, wait, I don’t seem to be dying,” Sally Allen Riddle, former managing director of product at Purdue, recalls in a conversation with Esquire. In addition, his patent was about to expire.

In a 1990 memorandum addressed to Richard Sackler and other top managers of the company, the company’s vice president of clinical research, Robert Kaiko, proposed the development of oxycodone, a substance similar to morphine, which was developed in 1916 by German scientists based on the opium poppy.

The advantage of this substance was that it was mistakenly considered weaker than morphine. Plus, inexpensive to manufacture, it has already been used in other drugs in combination with aspirin or paracetamol, which doctors have prescribed for severe injuries and injuries. “Oxycodone didn’t have the same negative connotation as morphine,” Riddle recalls.

Perdue Pharma has released pure oxycodone with a controlled release formula similar to MC-Continu. The company produced tablets in dosages of 10, 80 and 160 milligrams, which were stronger than any prescription opioid. Journalist and Pulitzer nominee Barry Meyer wrote in his book Pain Killer:

“In terms of drug power, Oxycontin was a nuclear weapon.”

In 1995, the FDA approved the use of OxyContin for moderate to severe pain. Purdue Pharma was allowed to label the packaging that the drug’s long-term exposure “diminishes” its attractiveness to drug addicts compared to other pain relievers (it was removed in 2001, and no opioid drug has been labeled this way since then).

Dr. Curtis Wright, who oversaw the FDA’s expertise, soon left the organization. Two years later, he went to work for the Sacklers. At a company meeting celebrating the launch of a new drug, Richard Sackler (son of Raymond Sackler) said, “The launch of OxyContin will be followed by a recipe blizzard that will bury the competition. She will be strong, dense and white. “

Jessica Hill / AP

Mortimer, Raymond and Richard Sackler took over Arthur’s marketing tactics and launched one of the largest advertising campaigns in pharmaceutical history. They have hired thousands of sales representatives, trained them and armed them with charts describing the benefits of the drug.

The company aimed to change the prevailing opinion among doctors that OxyContin should be prescribed only in cases of severe short-term pain in oncology and surgery, but also in cases of arthritis, back pain, injuries, and so on. One of the company’s managers, Stephen May, told The New Yorker that they had special trainings to “overcome doctors’ objections.”

At Purdue Pharma, they learned how to properly answer questions about possible drug abuse and convince professionals that it is virtually non-addictive.

Of course, no one took their word for it: the company paid thousands of medical practitioners to participate in various workshops (all costs covered) and report on the benefits of OxyContin.

Purdue approached the promotion from all angles: wholesalers received discounts, first-time pharmacists were reimbursed, patients received coupons for 30-day starter packs, academics received grants, medical journals received multimillion-dollar advertising, and members of Congress received generous donations.

Add to this massive advertising in professional publications and literature, advertisements with happy and satisfied patients on TV, and even specialized merchandise – fishing hats, plush toys, luggage tags, and so on.

It soon became known that Oxycontin was used as a drug. On the packaging of the product there was a warning about a possible narcotic effect: it said that if you inhale the powder from the crushed drug or inject it, it will lead to a rapid release of the drug and the absorption of a potentially toxic dose.

Some patients on prescriptions for OxyContin started selling the drug on the black market – at a price of one dollar per milligram.

In an interview with Esquire, Curtis Wright (the same FDA official who gave the green light to the prescription use of OxyContin) said that the drug use of OxyContin came as a shock to everyone: … It wasn’t Perdue’s invention, it wasn’t a secret plan or a clever marketing ploy. Chronic pain is terrible. When used correctly, opioid therapy is nothing short of a miracle; we brought people back to life. “

Between 1996 and 2001, the number of prescriptions for OxyContin in the United States grew from 300,000 to nearly six million – and the drug began to bring Purdue Pharma $ 1 billion a year. And in 2016, Forbes estimated the Sackler family’s fortune at $ 13 billion. This is just a rough figure: Purdue Pharma does not disclose its details. In the ranking of the richest American families, the Sacklers overtake the Rockefellers.

Temple of Dendur at the Metropolitan Museum, Sackler Wing

And here comes Guggenheim

The Sackler family are great philanthropists, they sponsor dozens of museums around the world, fund various scientific and research programs, universities and other institutions. “Unlike Andrew Carnegie, who has built hundreds of libraries in small towns, and Bill Gates, whose foundation serves the world, the Sacklers have woven their name into a patronage network of the world’s most prestigious and wealthy institutions.

The name Sackler is everywhere – and automatically evokes reverence. At the same time, the Sacklers themselves are almost invisible, ”wrote the American Esquire.

The courtyard of the Victoria and Albert Museum in London was reopened in the summer of 2017 after extensive renovation. The space of six tennis courts is decorated with a mosaic of 11 thousand porcelain tiles, handcrafted by the oldest Dutch company Koninklijke Tichelaar Makkum.

The courtyard is now known as the Sackler Courtyard – the museum does not disclose information about its donors, so it is not known for certain how much the family donated to V&A. Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton attended the grand opening of the courtyard. Stepping onto the shiny ceramic surface, she just said, “Wow,” recalls Esquire.

The Sackler family’s portfolio is not limited to the Victoria and Albert Museum.

Here are just some of the cultural institutions to which they are related: an entire wing in the New York Metropolitan Museum is named after them – it contains a grandiose artifact of ancient Egypt, the Dendur Temple, saved during the construction of a power plant on the Nile.

There is a Sackler wing in the Louvre and the British Royal Academy of Arts, its own museums – at Harvard and the University of Beijing, the Arthur Sackler Gallery – at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington, the Sackler Center at the Guggenheim Museum in New York, and an educational laboratory at the Natural History Museum in Manhattan … Family members are known in museum circles for giving projects their names, Esquire notes.

In 1974, when Arthur and his brothers made a $ 3.5 million donation to the Metropolitan Museum, they carefully prescribed that every sign, catalog and newsletter entry in the Sackler wing, included the names of all three brothers, with the MD subscript.

One of the museum officials even sarcastically: “It only remained to indicate their working schedule.” More modest projects have also received the Sackler name: for example, the Sackler Staircase at the Jewish Museum in Berlin, the Sackler escalator at the Tate Modern, the Sackler Crossroads at the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew in southwest London. A variety of pink roses is even named after them. And an asteroid.

Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton
Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton at the opening of the Victoria and Albert Museum after a major renovation

Opioid crisis

According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (a federal agency within the US Department of Health), 53,000 Americans died from opioid overdose in 2016.

The Opioid Crisis Commission, established by Donald Trump, cited an even more shocking figure of 64,000 – more than the total number of deaths from car accidents and from violence with firearms.

According to the commission, 142 people die daily from opioid overdose – as if 9/11 happened every three weeks. The opioid crisis has already been designated a health emergency. According to the medical publication STAT, if urgent measures are not taken, then about 500 thousand people can die from an overdose of opioids in the United States in the next 10 years.

Before the crisis entered its dangerous phase, the total economic burden of the state from opioid addicts was about $ 80 billion, including costs of health care and criminal justice.

Why the Sacklers are in trouble

Purdue Pharma has been repeatedly prosecuted in court, but for a long time the company has managed to avoid real liability. It was only in 2007 that the company admitted in a criminal proceeding that it had used doctors’ misconceptions about the potency of oxycodone to its advantage.

The materials said that the company “was well aware that the belief of doctors that oxycodone is weaker than morphine is wrong” and “did not want to take any action on this matter.” In accordance with the agreement reached, Purdue Pharma paid $ 600 million in fines, and three top managers of the company pleaded guilty and were sentenced to multimillion-dollar fines and community service.

At the same time, not a single Sackler figured in the lawsuit, despite the fact that Richard Sackler led the company during the most active period of promotion of OxyContin. This may now be changing: Last June, Massachusetts attorney general Maura Haley sued Purdue Pharma, its top executives and eight members of the Sackler family.

The state’s lawsuit contains dozens of internal documents from Purdue Pharma, which concluded that the Sackler family was much more actively involved in the company’s affairs than it was alleged.

The Sacklers were aware that the company did not disclose to the authorities information about the use of OxyContin as a drug and its sale on the black market, according to the lawsuit. Purdue Pharma also aggressively promoted the product in order to increase sales – in particular, through the use of discount cards for pharmacies.

Richard Sackler, who served as president of Purdue Pharma from 1999 to 2003, is named in court documents as the man responsible for all key decisions to promote OxyContin and to cover up drug abuse.

In particular, when Richard Sackler became aware of the 59 deaths from an OxyContin overdose in Massachusetts, he did not attach much importance to this: “It’s not that bad. It could have been much worse, ”he wrote to his subordinates.

However, as Esquire notes, the Sacklers are very likely to get off the water: in the agreement to waiver of prosecution, which the company entered into in 2007, paying a huge fine, the new charges will mainly relate to the company’s activities after 2007. Neither Richard Sackler nor other family members have held senior management positions at Purdue Pharma since 2003.

The company claims that the number of prescriptions for OxyContin dropped by 33% from 2012 to 2016, but at the same time it is expanding into the international market.

Investigation by The Los Angeles Times says Purdue is promoting OxyContin in Mexico, Brazil and China using the same marketing strategies: organizing panels and discussions on chronic pain, paying speakers to talk about the drug as an effective pain reliever, citing horrific numbers about the millions of people suffering from “silent pain”.

Following an investigation by The Los Angeles Times in May 2017, a number of congressmen sent a letter to the World Health Organization stating that the Sackler-owned companies were preparing to flood foreign countries with legal drugs.


Raised by Wolves: Microsoft has been tasked with developing a global digital passport

Raised by Wolves: Microsoft has been tasked with developing a global digital passport 100
Photo: Raised by Wolves, directed by Ridley Scott and Aaron Guzikowski

According to the Hill, a coalition of medical and technology organizations is working to develop a digital COVID-19 vaccination passport that will allow businesses, airlines and countries to check whether people have received the vaccine. 

The vaccination initiative, announced Thursday, is developing technology to confirm vaccinations, with the likelihood that some governments will require people to provide proof of their vaccinations to enter the country.

The organization hopes the technology will enable people to “demonstrate their health to safely return to travel, work, school and life, while protecting the privacy of their data.”

The initiative, which includes members such as Microsoft, Oracle and the American non-profit Mayo Clinic, is using the results of the Commons Project’s international digital document confirming a negative COVID-19 test, according to the Financial Times.

The Commons Project technology, created in partnership with the Rockefeller Foundation , is already being used by three major airline alliances.

The coalition is reportedly in talks with several governments to create a program requiring either negative tests or proof of vaccination, Paul Meyer, executive director of The Commons Project, told the Times.

“The goal of the Vaccine Initiative is to give people digital access to their vaccination records so they can use tools like CommonPass to safely return to travel, work, school and life while protecting the privacy of their data ,” Meier said in a statement. …

People who have been vaccinated are currently receiving a sheet of paper confirming their vaccination, he said, but the coalition could develop a digital certificate using electronic health records.

The technology should allow patients to keep their data safe by being available in a digital wallet or physical QR code so that they can regulate who sees the information.

The Vaccine Initiative assumes that certain businesses, such as event organizers and universities, will require their consumers, students and employees to provide proof of vaccination , the Times reported.

Mike Sicily, executive vice president of Oracle Global Business Units, says in a statement that a passport “should be as simple as online banking.”

“We are committed to working together with the technology and medical communities, as well as with global governments, to ensure that people have safe access to this information, no matter where and when they may need it,” he added.

The project is also evolving as new strains of COVID-19 emerge around the world, including the spread of a more contagious variant that has been found in the United Kingdom.

It should be understood that only those travelers who received the RIGHT vaccine will receive permission to fly and cross borders.

Are people really vaccinated? Are we being raised by wolves?

The material is taken from the public website of this biotech giant, founded in 2010 to develop drugs and vaccines based on messenger RNA (mRNA) technologies. The company became known to our readers due to the launch of the eponymous vaccine against the Covid-19 virus on the market.


“Recognizing the wide potential of mRNA science, we decided to create a technological platform for mRNA that is very similar to the operating system on a computer. It is designed so that it can be connected and interchangeable with various programs. In our case, the “program” or “application” is our mRNA preparation – a unique mRNA sequence that encodes a protein.

“May 1, 2020 Moderna, Inc. and Lonza Ltd. today announced a 10-year strategic collaboration agreement to enable large-scale production of Moderna mRNA vaccine (mRNA-1273) against the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) .

The primary conclusion is that the so-called Moderna vaccine is not at all like traditional vaccines, which use live or dead, natural or engineered parts of the RNA of the virus, designed to induce an immune response and form antibodies in the body.

The drug “mRNA-1273” is not a vaccine against a virus, but, in fact, is an artificial bioprogrammed virus.

Based on the author’s definition of the mRNA platform as an analogue of a computer operating system, if you adhere to the declared letter, it should be recognized: the drug is intended for (re) programming the human body by (re) coding its protein. In other words, the masks are off, the mRNA platform is the place where Big Pharma teams up with Big Tech, justifying the darkest predictions yesterday by science fiction writers, and today by realists.

If you take a good walk around the Moderna website, you will find very interesting things.

For example, the company clearly recognizes that a healthy immune system poses a threat to mRNA, since an intense immune response can destroy the platform before it even starts to act and which can lead to negative results, which can include molecular deficiency and hormonal defects, and cause seizures, allergic reactions, infertility and other side effects, but at the same time it does not form a targeted immune response to coronavirus proteins at all. 

In addition, the self (re) programming of cells is necessary in order for them to be open for the reception and delivery of various drugs, the effectiveness of which is often significantly reduced due to rejection by the body.

What this means: a healthy immune system after the introduction of the drug “mRNA-1273” is (re) programmed either unpredictably or predictably, but for the further purposes of the Moderna company, which is vitally interested in the fact that the human body is further open for access to pharmaceutical companies … The immune system actually breaks open, opening the door for any biotechnological experiments on the human body.

Due to the fact that such biotechnologies are at the beginning of the path, which is always associated with a great risk to life, the Moderna company at the legislative level is exempted by the US Congress from liability for the consequences of the use of its drugs. Also, by the way, like the Pfizer company.

Is this an explanation of the reason for the planned mass vaccination of all people in 2021, as well as the “sharp aggravation of the pandemic” in the world media?

Continue Reading


Freemasonry calendar for 2021 and the next 25 years: Earthlink & BrainTrust

Freemasonry calendar for 2021 and the next 25 years: Earthlink & BrainTrust 101

With the onset of the covid pandemic, vaccinations, immunization passports and other such miracles, conspiracy theorists were surprised to find that all this was written in plain text on the Internet many years ago. The people who determine the strategic course of the world have communicated their plans quite openly. Until a certain moment, no one paid attention to these plans.

However, now that everything that is happening has become more or less clear, many enthusiasts began to re-read the texts with great interest and revise the videos of 2010 and earlier years, trying to find in them both indications of the events taking place around the current events and the events that will follow. The next discovery of this kind was a video from 2008 from Casaleggio Associati – a small Masonic organization somehow connected with Gianroberto Casaleggio.

From the first visit, the conspiracy theorists did not manage to dig very deeply, but, according to the first impression, we are talking about regional masonry of a not very high level of management, so there is clearly not all the information there, especially information for showing the general public.

Nevertheless, some crumbs of knowledge are still better than its complete absence, so we will retell the video in general terms. The first five minutes there is an introductory one, which tells about the great thinkers of the Renaissance who opposed Genghis Khan and wanted to arrange the world correctly and justly. This desire lasted for centuries, until the baton passed to the US Democratic Party and the Bilderberg Club. Then, from the middle of the fifth minute of the video, the most interesting part begins.

In 2018, according to the forecast from 2008, the world will be divided into two blocks – the block of good guys who live in Europe, and the block of bad guys who live in China and its satellites: The war between the blocks begins in 2020 with the use of bacteriological weapons. The war will last 20 years. During the war, such cultural monuments as Reims Cathedral, St. Peter’s Square and the Sagrada Familia will be destroyed, which suggests that there will be no stone unturned from Italy, France and Spain.

Also, in addition to biological weapons, at the first stage of the war, climate weapons will be used, which will cause a rise in ocean level by 12 meters with all the ensuing consequences. There will also be a world famine and a rejection of fossil fuels – tanks by the end of the war will be some kind of electric. As a result of this, the West will win by 2040, but there will be no more than a billion people on the planet who will be offered a single electric passport and a networked democracy, which will be controlled by the World Government and Earthlink Artificial Intelligence.

Earthlink will start operating in 2043, a single passport will be issued in 2047, and in 2050 there will be the so-called BrainTrust – collective social intelligence: When BrainTrust starts working, people will connect their brains into a network and collectively choose the World Government, which will lead them, proclaiming the coming of the Era of the New World Order. It will appear in 2054. Here is such an interesting Masonic tale of the 2008 model. Oddly enough, but so far the chronology is being observed and the prophecy is coming true.

Continue Reading


Covid-19: The Great Reset -Pandemic targets declared

Covid-19: The Great Reset -Pandemic targets declared 102

The working class of the United States is in despair. This was stated by Senator Bernie Sanders on his Twitter page. He also wrote that the US Congress should listen to the people and provide a one-time payment of $ 1,200 to each member of the working class.

“Maybe – just maybe – it’s time for Congress to listen to the American people and send out survival checks for $ 1,200 to working-class Americans who are now in such despair,” Sanders said.

On March 25, the U.S. Congress approved a one-time payment of $ 1,200 to every adult U.S. citizen. The purpose of the payment was to mitigate the social impact of quarantine measures and the coronavirus pandemic.

Sanders is in favor of re-payment, as the crisis caused by the quarantine and pandemics is not only not overcome, but is developing.

However, it is quite possible that not only American workers will receive benefits soon. 

The FGC website spoke about the book “Covid-19: The Great Reset”, published in the summer of 2020 in Europe. The authors of the book are Klaus Schwab, founder and permanent leader of the World Economic Forum (WEF) and Thierry Mallre, who is presented as a futurist.

By the end of 2020, the book should be published in German, French, Spanish, Japanese, Chinese and Korean.

The main ideas of the book about “great reset” are already diverging.

First , the COVID-19 pandemic is a “unique window of opportunity.” It is through this window that humanity must be introduced into the future. No return to the past! “Many people ask: when will we return to normal life? The short answer is never. Our story will be divided into two parts: before the coronavirus and after. “

Secondly , the “bright future” is a world where the distinctions between rich and poor countries will be erased, and over time state borders will be destroyed. A single planetary state with a single government will emerge: “The question of the World Government is at the center of all issues.” Further, Schwab writes: “With the introduction of lockdown, our attachment to loved ones increases, we value more those whom we love – family members and friends. But the downside here is that it causes a rise in patriotic and national feelings, along with dark religious beliefs and ethnic preferences. And this toxic mixture brings out the worst in us … “Schwab makes it clear that” dark religious beliefs and ethnic preferences “will be declared war.

Third , the economy of the Brave New World must be centrally run by giant monopolies. Private property will wither away, its place will be taken by the “economy of use”, “the economy of participation”. There will be no cash, digital currencies will be introduced everywhere.

Fourthly , there will be a transition to “green” energy, it will replace hydrocarbon energy. Limits will be imposed on the consumption of water, electricity, some “environmentally hazardous” types of products (eg meat) or industrial products (eg cars). And the most radical means of reducing the burden on the natural environment will be to reduce demographic growth or even to reduce the population: “The greater the demographic growth … the higher the risk of new pandemics.”

Fifth , robotization will be completed in all spheres of the economy and public life. The book “The Great Reset” says many times about the sharp job cuts: “Until 2035, up to 86% of jobs in restaurants, 75% of jobs in trade and 59% in the entertainment industries can be automated.” “Up to 75% of restaurants can go broke due to lockdowns and subsequent social distancing measures.” “Not a single industry, not a single enterprise will remain unaffected.” It is proposed to introduce an unconditional basic income (UBI) for people who will be replaced by robots, but only if the person confirms that he is vaccinated.

Sixth , digitalization of all spheres of the economy and society will continue. An effective system will be created to monitor the behavior and movement of people, including using face recognition technologies. Quote: “To end the pandemic, a worldwide digital surveillance network must be created.”

Seventh , the new health care model will provide for regular testing, compulsory vaccination, issuance of a sanitary passport, and the establishment of restrictions and punishments for persons who evade the rules of medical discipline.

Eighth , in the spirit of transhumanism, a person will be “improved”.

The goals of the “pandemic” have been declared. With the support that the “great reset” receives from the camp of globalism, there is no doubt that the notorious “pandemic” is the beginning of the operation of the transition to the “brave new world.” Will there be forces capable of resisting the reset-globalists? .. This is an open question.

Continue Reading