Connect with us

Fact or fiction

Shocking statements: “NASA is a lie and astronauts are paid actors”

In almost 60 years of NASA’s supposed space exploration, it has never been able to offer us a single genuine photograph of Earth from space. No real! Even though we have had good high resolution cameras for almost 100 years, NASA has never taken a true photograph of our planet, Earth.

NASA is a lie

By its own admission, all the images we see are composite materials, paintings or computer generated images. Why is this? It could be the answer, horror of horrors, that NASA has never been in space, or at least, not far enough from Earth to have the entire planet in the picture.

Houston, we have a problem…

Above, we have been able to see some pictures of rockets and launches from the NASA space shuttle, using extended exposures to allow us to follow the vehicle for much longer than we would see during normal TV coverage. Do you notice anything strange in the trajectories? Well, I’m not a genius, but according to my Flash Gordon comics the rockets are supposed to go up, not up and then immediately back down … or somewhere in the sea!

Houston, we have another problem …

Surrounding the Earth, beginning at an altitude of 1,000 miles (1,600 kilometers) and extending an additional 25,000 miles (40233 kilometers), are the deadly radiation bands called the Van Allen radiation belts, which could fry the instrumentation of a board and sicken any daredevil astronaut enough by going through them. So, how did the Apollo missions get through the Van Allen belts back in the 1960s, when NASA is currently struggling with ways to protect its astronauts on their (supposedly) next trip to Mars? In this video, NASA engineer Kelly Smith tries to explain it.

Three naughty schoolboys

Here is something for anyone who still believes that we went to the Moon. It is the convoluted convergence at the Apollo 11 Press Conference immediately after the return of the astronauts to Earth. Keep in mind that these three freemasons, sorry astronauts, sorry men supposedly just returned from the greatest adventure in the history of mankind. These guys are national heroes of the USA. They have fulfilled the dream of every child. We would expect them to be excited, excited and encouraged to have survived the trip, and to have walked on the moon! And yet, they are strangely muffled, nervously watching their teleprompters, and each other, responding to journalists’ questions. “Stars? What stars …? “

At minute 01:04:42, at the Apollo 11 Press Conference held after the return of the astronauts, Neil Armstrong was asked to remember having seen a star in the lunar sky, a subject that the crew was apparently asking to avoid since the correct astrological positions of the constellations were too difficult to simulate in the false lunar backgrounds. Armstrong then erroneously responds with “I do not remember”, to which Aldrin makes a face of annoyance in his mistake (as if one could forget an important detail that they witnessed first hand in his supposed universally unique experience). To help Armstrong recover from being shot by this difficult question, crew member Michael Collins offered assistance by interposing himself saying “I do not remember seeing any.” The problem is, he forgot he was not there! (It was Buzz Aldrin who supposedly stepped on the surface of the moon with Armstrong, not Collins!)

NASA has not been anywhere

What if it is not possible to send things into space, even put things in Earth’s orbit? There are three serious obstacles to putting things in space and getting them to stay there, and these must be accommodated within our “reality framework” so that we can determine what is real and the reality of NASA.

1. The Thermosphere

Forget about the lethal Van Allen radiation belts, which extend for thousands of kilometers around the Earth, the main reason why nothing has gone into space is the Thermosphere. This atmospheric layer begins about 50 miles (80 km.) High, where temperatures begin to rise to the Kármán line that reaches 62 miles (100 km.). Beyond this point, the heat increases drastically, rising rapidly to 125 miles (200 km.), Where temperatures can reach 2500 ° C.

For reference: the oven in your kitchen can reach 240 ° C maximum. A crematorium reaches 1000 ° C, and a blast furnace to melt iron can reach as high as 2300 ° C. NASA uses aluminum, magnesium, titanium and epoxy-graphite composite materials to build its spacecraft, all of which would melt at these high temperatures in the thermosphere. Both aluminum and magnesium melt at 660 ° C, titanium at 1668 ° C. While graphite has a high melting point (5500 ° C), it is also an excellent conductor of heat, although your spacecraft will most likely disintegrate long before astronauts are cooked to ashes! Humans can not survive exposures above 70 ° C.

2. The Orbiting Mechanism

What things float in space when they are beyond 100 km from Earth? Does gravity magically stop affecting objects at this distance? The official answer is that above 100 kilometers the objects are essentially in free fall, but if something travels fast enough laterally, like the space shuttle at 28,000 km / h, then this velocity will cause the object to fall constantly along the convex curve of the Earth, in this way it never reaches the ground – hence the maintenance of itself “in orbit”.

This is known as the theory of gravity, the extrapolation of an idea originally conceived by Isaac Newton in the 17th century, and today increasingly rejected by people of clearer thoughts who have their feet firmly on the ground. In fact, Newton himself, after a certain contemplation, thought about the practical application of his ridiculous theory, as he explained in a letter to a friend, Richard Bentley in 1692:

“That gravity should be innate, inherent and essential to matter, so that one body can act on another at a distance through a vacuum without the mediation of anything else, through and through which its action and force can to be transmitted from one to another, is for me such an absurdity that I believe that no man, who has a competent faculty of thinking in philosophical matters, can never fall into it. ” – Isaac Newton

The idea that a body with enough mass can exert a force of attraction on another, as a planet is supposed to have on its moon (astronauts and spacecraft), has never been proven or proven. A growing number of physicists are questioning whether gravity exists at all.

3. The abundance of counterfeit

If NASA really put things into orbit, sent men to the Moon and launched the probes into outer space, then why is there so much secrecy, subterfuge and falsification of it? And the biggest condemnation of all, why can not NASA produce a simple genuine photograph of Earth from space?

The famous “Blue Marble”

NASA is a lie

Precious, no? Well, it’s false! This iconic image (above) was armed with presumed “satellite” data and then photoshopped so crudely that you will see it if you click on the image. The discovery of duplicate clouds has led to accusations that not only the 2002 image (blue marble II) is a fake, but the original image of Apollo 17 (blue blue marble I) was probably a fake too. That, in turn, has led some to wonder if everything NASA did and said was false.

NASA says: This spectacular image of the “blue marble” is the most detailed true-color image of the entire Earth to date. Using a set of observations based on satellites, scientists and visualizers together sewed months of observations of the Earth’s surface, oceans, sea ice, and clouds in a continuous mosaic of true color from each square kilometer of our planet.

It’s all about expectations, says the artist from NASA:

“The last time someone took an overhead photograph of low Earth orbit that showed a complete hemisphere (one side of a globe) was in 1972 during Apollo 17. The satellites of NASA’s Earth Observation System (EOS) ) were designed to perform a health check of the Earth. By the year 2002, we finally had enough data to make an instantaneous take of the entire Earth. That’s what we did. “

“The most difficult part was the creation of a flat map of the Earth’s surface with the four-month satellite data. Reto Stockli, now at the Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, did much of this work. Then we wrapped the map flat around a sphere. My part was to integrate the surface, clouds and oceans to match people’s expectations of how Earth looks from space. That ball became the famous Blue Marble. “  – Robert Simmon, artist at NASA.

All very fascinating, but would not it be easier to simply take a photograph – alone a photograph – from one of its more than 3000 satellites? Apparently not. The good people of NASA tell us that the only ‘photos’ of the entire Earth were taken during the Apollo 17 mission. The fact that this mission, along with all the other Apollo missions, never really left the earth, are going to Do the search for these problematic photos.

Yes, but NASA has satellites. It is not like this? I mean, NASA has been sending objects into space for years, is not it? True? How can we know? The problem is that this US government agency, with its multi-million dollar budget, has a monopoly on all space artifacts. The only way to know for sure would be to go there ourselves, independently of NASA, and take a look around. This is exactly what Sir Richard Branson tried in 2014.

Will there be a conclusion to make? By conclusion we mean a judgment or determination on the reality of NASA of the so-called “space program”? Is that what we want, even if it runs the risk of being presented with the worst case where everything has been a big lie? Because if, as the facts seem to indicate, NASA has not even been in orbit (whatever it is), then we have to get used to a completely new reality, without moon landings, satellites, Hubble telescope, International Space Station, or missions to Mars. Yes, even worse, one of the reasons why there is nothing in orbit is because gravity does not exist, so what is preventing us from getting rid of Nasa’s Earth-Marble?

Advertisement
Comments

Fact or fiction

Independent Scientists Claim That We Are Living In 1722, Not In 2019

Today more and more independent scientists come to the conclusion that three centuries have been lost in the history of mankind. But how did it happen and why?

Experts based on the study of many historical documents came to the conclusion that in the period from the 8th to the 11th centuries, chronological events are inconsistent, vague, imprecise and very poor, as if they were simply made up.

There are irrefutable documents indicating the loss of three centuries. Thus, the grandiose construction in Constantinople of that period was for some reason abruptly suspended … for three centuries and then suddenly resumed.

Exactly the same absurdity can be traced when building the Aachen Cathedral in Germany. And there are too many inconsistencies.

This huge leap in history’s timeline may have been a result of some confusion when the Pope switched from the Julian calendar to the Gregorian calendar in 1582 A.D., where there was a discrepancy of at least 10 days.

Maybe there was a misinterpretation of documents somewhere along the line, as forged historical documents aren’t necessarily rare. But maybe it was no accident at all.

The phantom time hypothesis is a theory asserted by Heribert Illig and first published in 1991. It hypothesizes a conspiracy by the Holy Roman Emperor Otto III, Pope Sylvester II, and possibly the Byzantine Emperor Constantine VII, to fabricate the Anno Domini dating system retrospectively, in order to place them at the special year of AD 1000, and to rewrite history to legitimize Otto’s claim to the Holy Roman Empire.

Heribert Illig believed that this was achieved through the alteration, misrepresentation and forgery of documentary and physical evidence. According to this scenario, the entire Carolingian period, including the figure of Charlemagne, is a fabrication, with a “phantom time” of 297 years (AD 614–911) added to the Early Middle Ages.

So it is quite possible that we live in 1722, and not in 2019.

Source link

Continue Reading

Fact or fiction

RMS Titanic Urban Legends: Fraud on a Massive Scale?

In the early hours of April 15th 1912, RMS Titanic had her name permanently etched in the annals of maritime history. Over the years, a multitude of rumours have circulated surrounding her sinking ranging from evidential studies of her speed of descent and debris spread on the ocean floor all the way through to supernatural influences.

This three-part article delves into the more fanciful of those rumours.

Part 1: The ‘Olympic’ Switch

RMS Titanic was built alongside her sister RMS Olympic at the Harland and Wolff Shipyard in Belfast, Ireland between her initial laying down on 31st March 1909 until her pre-completion launch on 31st May 1911. The 3rd Olympic-Class sister, RMS Britannic, would be built later.

Titanic and Olympic were almost identical in size, profile, and detail with only very minor differences between the two Goliaths. While the majority of building works on the two vessels took place at the same time, Olympic was always to be the lead ship for White Star Line’s Olympic-Class fleet and as such she was started and completed earlier than Titanic; her pre-completion launch took place on 20th October 1910.

On 20th September 1911 off the coast of the Isle of Wight, the Olympic was struck – and severely damaged – by the British warship HMS Hawke. Despite the damage, Olympic managed to return to Southampton under her own power. As an interesting aside, the collision with HMS Hawke occurred while Olympic was under the command of Captain Edward Smith, who would be lost at sea less than a year later with Titanic.

Titanic olympic

The damage caused by the collision with HMS Hawke had dramatic implications for White Star Line; found culpable for the collision, the company’s insurance would not cover her repair costs and having the ship out of service while Titanic lay unfinished in the Belfast shipyard could have serious implications for the company. Getting Olympic repaired and operational again was pushed to the forefront of the White Star Line’s interest.

A Plan of Fraud on a Massive Scale

The popular urban legend kicks into place here, as instigated and investigated by Robin Gardiner in his book, “Titanic: The Ship that Never Sank?” (Ian Allen Publishing, 1998). To save time and money, says the legend, White Star Line merely patched up the damage to the Olympic; meanwhile, under cover of darkness, Titanic was readied as the new Olympic. Very little between the two ships was branded with the individual vessels’ name so, by changing the bell, lifeboats, and name plates along with minor amendments to navigational equipment, the two ships could easily be switched.

According to Gardiner, White Star Line’s plan was to run Titanic as the Olympic and scuttle the original Olympic during her maiden voyage disguised as the newer vessel thus allowing them to claim the insurance money for the Titanic while ridding themselves of a money trap in the original Olympic.

White Star Line planned for rescue ships to be posted in the vicinity of the planned sinking, hence there was no need for sufficient lifeboats on board to cope with the number of passengers as the boat would sink slowly and several runs could be carried out to the rescue boats. Of course this plan backfired spectacularly as we all know but Gardiner suggests that even this is not necessarily in the reported way.

Subsequent Investigation.

For a more balanced view on this argument, Bruce Beveridge and Steve Hall’s book “Olympic and Titanic: The Truth behind the Conspiracy” (Six Star Publishing, 2004) offers an unbiased and reasoned account of the fact and fiction of this theory and is a highly recommended starting point for further reading on this subject.

Subsequent studies and investigation of the wreck appear to have proved that it is indeed the original Titanic that lies on the sea bed and Olympic overcame the damage caused from the collision with HMS Hawke and continued to serve the White Star Line until her retirement and scrapping in 1935. Despite these conclusions, the tale remains a fascinating theory that continues to be debated today.

Part 2: What Sank the Titanic?

The commonly-held belief that the Titanic fatally struck an iceberg in the north Atlantic has been questioned a few times in the years since the event.

One theory is linked to Part 1 of this article and again comes from Robin Gardiner in his book “Titanic: The Ship That Never Sank?” (1998. Ian Allen Publishing). This theory suggests that, while en-route to the proposed location where the attempt to sabotage the ship – ostensibly by releasing the sea cocks to slowly flood the vessel – was to take place, Titanic and Olympic (henceforth referred to simply as Titanic) actually struck an un-lit International Mercantile Marine Company (IMM) vessel.

IMM had absorbed White Star Line in 1902 and the ship that was struck is said to have been one of the vessels positioned to rescue passengers from theTitanic once the controlled sinking had commenced. This would explain why the boat was drifting without any form of lighting and why it was not seen in sufficient time to prevent the collision.

Titanic

This theory, explains Gardiner, would also justify the actions of the nearby Californian, a ship that was castigated in the trials following the Titanic tragedy for not making her way to the stricken liner to assist in the rescue.

It is said that the Californian did not react to the distress signals that were sighted as it was waiting for the Titanic to reach it; IMM also owned the Leyland line, which operated the Californian and the ship was on duty to rescue passengers from the Titanic. It remains unclear within the remit of this rumour as to whether the distress flares that were seen from the Californian came from the Titanic or the IMM ship that she had struck.

Gardiner also surmises that the ice found on the deck of the liner did not come from the iceberg at all, but instead was shaken loose from the rigging of the IMM vessel and the Titanic itself by the impact.

An unnamed survivor of the sinking also noted seeing a half-submerged vessel in the water directly after the collision; Gardiner suggests that this was most likely a lifeboat which had been knocked from the IMM ship during the collision and other theories put forward that the IMM ship then limped away from the scene so as not to be found within the area of the Titanic although there remains the possibility that the sinking vessel sighted was in fact the IMM rescue boat itself.

Iceberg or Pack Ice?

The iceberg theory was once again called into question in 2003 when former Captain of the Ice Pilotage Service, L. M. Collins, published his book, “The Sinking of the Titanic: The Mystery Solved” (2003, Souvenir Press). In his study, Collins drew on his experience in ice navigation along with witness statements from the two post-incident enquiries that took place at the time.

Collins notes that reports relating to the height of the ice varied dependant on the position on the ship of the witness. These reports varied from being low in the water on the starboard side, through 60ft high in front of the ship to a massive 100ft (30m) high being reported by Quartermaster Rowe on the poop deck.

Collins suggests that this difference in heights can be attributed to an optical illusion common to navigators of ice plains whereby cold air and flat seas combine to make the ice appear to be as high as the vessel’s lights at that point.

The lights of the Titanic were positioned at approximately 60ft above the waterline at the bow and 100ft above the waterline along the superstructure of the ship. The report of ice being low in the water came from Fourth Officer Boxhall who was positioned on the darkened starboard side at the time of the collision.

Further to this Collins states that, as the Titanic turned through pivoting at a point located approximately a quarter of her length from the bow, reports of the ship being pulled hard to starboard would have actually resulted in the ship not catching a glancing blow from the iceberg but instead striking it square on the starboard side. Collins relates that a collision such as this would be more likely to crush the entire starboard hull and possibly even the superstructure resulting in the ship capsizing and sinking within minutes.

Part 3: Supernatural Influences

One of the more bizarre rumours surrounding the liner was the tale of sectarianism in her birthplace of Belfast leading to a curse on the ship. The rumour would have us believe that Titanic was given the yard number 390904 which, when read as a reflection via a mirror, resembles the statement ‘NOPOPE’.

This was deemed as an indication of the company’s alleged anti-Catholic beliefs, compounded by a shortage of Protestant employees. While it was true that Harland and Wolff employed very few Catholics, it is unproven as to whether this was as a result of employment policy or merely due to the location of the shipyard in an area of Belfast that was highly-populated with Protestants.

In fact, Titanic and her sister Olympic were granted the yard numbers 401 and 400 respectively. But of course, that doesn’t make for nearly as juicy a tale!

The Cursed Cargo.

A fascinating legend surrounding the sinking – and the one that initially sparked my interest in the myths surrounding the vessel – is the tale of her cursed cargo.

The tale tells of the discovery in the 1890’s of the mummified remains of an Egyptian Priestess, often thought to be that of the Priestess of Amen-Ra. Following the discovery, the person who purchased the mummy ran into a string of unfortunate incidents and illness, culminating in his eventual death.

Following the death of the initial purchaser, the mummy was donated to the British History Museum where the remains continued to cause concerns for staff and mysterious afflictions to affect those visitors that had dared to photograph her.

Titanic

Ongoing incidents and an elevated interest from the British press lead to the mummy being locked away in the Museum vault until journalist William Thomas Stead, discounting the previous events surrounding the remains as mere circumstance purchased the mummy and set in action plans to have her shipped to New York.

Reports at this point separate as some state that the mummy was in fact included on the cargo list of the Titanic (although this had been proved incorrect) while others report that the remains were actually hidden underneath Stead’s car as he feared that White Star would not accept her as cargo due to the reputation of the piece. Stead then reportedly revealed that he had stowed the mummy away to other passengers during merry-making the evening before the collision.

‘Futility’ – A Premonition of Disaster?

In 1898, Morgan Robertson published his novella “Futility”, otherwise known as “The Wreck of the Titan”. The story relates the fortunes of the hero, John Rowland, following the sinking of the World’s largest liner on her maiden voyage through striking an iceberg in the North Atlantic.

While the Titan was actually travelling in the opposite direction to the Titanic in the novel and she strikes the ice head-on as opposed to the glancing blow of the real ship, there remains some startling similarities between the 2 vessels.

– Both ships sank in a similar position (approximately 400 miles off Newfoundland) on an April night on their maiden voyage.
– The Titan was also the largest ship afloat and was deemed to be “unsinkable” / “indestructible”.
– The Titan also had as few lifeboats on board as was possible and nowhere near sufficient numbers to cope with the level of passengers on board.
– The casualties of both wrecks were considerable, taking the lives of in excess of half of the passengers on board.

Indeed, the similarities went even further with the fact that the Titan hit and sank a sailing ship, while the Titanic only narrowly avoided a collision the SS New York; when the Titanic left her berth on her maiden voyage, the New York was dragged from its moorings in the wake of the much larger ship and pulled towards the liner, missing her by around 4 feet before being towed away by a patrolling tugboat.

While, of course, Robertson could not have had any pre-cognition regarding the building of the Titanic – the Olympic-class liners had not even begun their design stages at the time of the novels’ release – the similarities between the story and actual events provide a quite astounding example of coincidence.

By Andy Hill

Source link

Continue Reading

Fact or fiction

Could an Alliance Between Land and Sea Stop an Alien Invasion?

Aquaman recently came out on home video. It was a critically praised film and a box office hit with the audience. People were happy to see Arthur Curry’s adventures in a solo mission. However, before this recent installment, Curry took on aliens in Justice League opposite his other heroic allies.

Since he is now king of Atlantis, the sea is no longer the enemy of the surface. If an alien invasion were to occur, as it did in Justice League, could an alliance between the land and sea be able to stop an alien invasion? This would be in a realistic scenario and not one that is seen on film.

Currently, there are no superheroes that we know of and just the armed forces remain in each country. They protect and guard against enemies foreign and domestic. We also have intelligence agencies that give us inside information on what our enemies are doing.

With this real-world standpoint in mind, we do not know what lies beneath us. It’s probably not a sonic bomb junior and it is something that has not been as explored as space. It remains interesting to think if there are humanoids living below us.

Humanoids that are below us would have different civilizations and technologies than our own. It would expose the surface world to new treasures that we have never found prior. It would change the face of our world if we had the opportunity to engage with them diplomatically and craft an alliance that would change the course of our history. They may have created technologies like the sonic bomb junior that we did within our time on this planet.

It’s fascinating to think about how we could work together to develop our worlds together. It could create not only diplomatic opportunities but economic opportunities for us to exchange ideas and develop new business ventures together.

Mostly, it would be like having another country out there. In Aquaman, each nation has its own armies and peoples, which would give us the chance to see all the diversity that is underneath our oceans. Nothing has been explored that much below us, so it would take our great explorers to find out more about the world around us.

Once we discovered these new nations below us and learned more about one another, the question comes down to it: would we be able to form an alliance against the aliens? It would totally depend on their levels of technology that are below us.

As Aquaman portrays, the Atlanteans and many other nations below us have had far more advanced technologies than we could ever dream. Mankind was always far behind the Atlantean nations and has been something they take great pride in it. As we see with mankind’s weapons in the film, they do not ever affect Arthur Curry. It’s only when David Kane/Black Manta gains access to Atlantean technology via Orm is when the tables turn.

This is where the earth could be a very powerful force indeed. If we were able to combine the technology of land and sea as well as the natural capabilities of the two species, it would be likely that we could put up a fight against the alien menace.

Another question remains though: what levels of technologies do the aliens have? If their technology is further along than mankind or our Atlantean brethren, it could mean the end for the earth as we know it. It all depends upon whether the world of man and the Atlantean nations are able to form an alliance.

That is the bottom line in all of this. If we are not able to form a partnership with our allies beneath us, there is no chance for us to survive. However, if we make such an alliance work and form bonds between ourselves and our brothers and sisters who can breathe both underwater, on land, and vice versa, we may have a chance in the end of defeating the aliens.

Only time will tell whether we can rise together from the waters of the earth to defeat those who wish us harm from the skies.

About author: Tommy Zimmer is a writer whose work has appeared online and in print. His work covers a variety of topics, including politics, economics, health and wellness, consumer electronics, and the entertainment industry.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending