Connect with us

Conspiracy Theories

The Set Up

There were Journeys and quests, sometimes only for the best kimchi – according to a Peace Corps Coordinator in a position to know – and sometimes for other things more Malaysian in flavor. Sabbatical is a loaded term. It is rarely about rest.

Lest a wizard be thought to shy from a challenge, it should be mentioned that I recently read a post over at Ghost Theory that took issue with some of my musings on the potential difficulties in finding Bigfoot. Good and vigorous debate elevates the mere discussion of faith to the level of philosophy, and by this, it enhances the species. The matter will be taken up in the next post, and I am glad that Paterson’s piece went up only a day after I returned to a part of the world where actual internet access was possible…

But first, I want to share with you some insights into Masonic Mysteries, Illuminati Agendas, and Global Power Conspiracies that inevitably seem to be invoked every time I go abroad. Also, I have to file my coded report for the Wizard High Council, so it seemed best to kill two birds with one stone.

Wink twice if you are receiving transmission…

Von Clausewitz tells us that war is little more than a duel on a grander scale, a kind of wrestling match between parties seeking to continue a policy by “other means.” What he has to do with the occult, I shall leave to the imagination and wit of the audience; no historical figure of significance can entirely escape being pulled into the ranks of secret orders and magical societies by some writer or another when it is convenient to do so.

But if Von Clausewitz knew his Plato – and he did – then we can at least conclude that some of the ancient mystery ideals and themes were barracked in his head. Pure war is also ideal war, and ideal war is inevitably total. Von Clausewitz did not create total war – it existed before him. But he did recognize that it was an absolute certainty, a natural result, an inevitability of the practice of organized and large-scale violence.


Play any real time strategy game and you will realize that people are a resource. Work in the corporate world and the same will occur to you: there is a department in virtually every operation of scale called – unashamedly – human resources. People are a form of chattel, a form of useful property, to those in the habit of wielding power. This is the essence of antisocial thinking, in the clinical sense. Total war, well-waged, seeks to destroy the enemy’s capacity and will to wage a fight. Strike at the people, and all else is threatened as well. Where there are no people, there can be no economic activity, no resource gathering, collection, and refining, and no supply of replacement workers and soldiers.

If you can read this, you’ve got a pretty good Eye.

A pattern that repeats is this: the person has a role. The role supports the state. Eliminate the state, and the role may perpetuate as an iteration taking a slightly different form. The person will at least continue, provided they are not destroyed in the general conflagration that destroys the state. Both person and role do not depend in their entirety upon the survival of the general society and culture. It is possible – though by no means desirable – for a person to self-define. But eliminate the person, and the role is eliminated. Eliminate all persons, and there is no longer a source for the procession. Plato’s great chain – and the Church’s too – is irrevocably broken.

The detonation of two nuclear bombs in succession is one way of saying to a nation, “We can exterminate your population.” This is also known as a default victory. It is a particularly persuasive form of communication when practiced by a people who have a history of genocidal behavior, on another people with a history of the same. Milton imagined well when he imagined that monsters can only truly know each other in the darkness.

Power has about it a certain quality of perpetuation and it is not at all surprising that those with power seek to retain and to extend it. We may class power into various realms. It is possible to understand that power is segregated into spiritual, mystical, physical, political, economic, social and cultural applications. It is equally possible to see power in aggregate, or to deduce from the variations in its exercise that there is one source with many iterations.

The Pentagram

Iteration in itself is a fascinating term. We speak here of the repetition of a function. The common usage anticipates that each application of the same process will have at least slightly varying results. This is simply a recognition of an ancient mystery principle. When a shape is repeated according to a pattern, a secret can be revealed; we decode the spiral shell in precisely this way. The secret is that through the use of the same process in different applications, similar results can be achieved. Thus, if the exact same mechanisms of power are applied in a new era as were applied before, they will provide the same level of control regardless of the trappings and shades that are used.


If the alternative media have impacted the cultural dialogue on a global scale, this can only mean that the hand that feeds them has allowed it to be so. There are forces and counterforces, but one of the most ancient mystery secrets concerns the unification of divergent dualities. When two things emerge from one and function as opposites, they may be unified into a more powerful whole. Thus, an iteration of the first form occurs. The process is followed, and the result appears different only because other iterations have simultaneously occurred: words have changed, languages have died and others have come to prominence, customs and cultures have evolved. The pattern is no different. Only the outcomes are different in their superficial components. The core remains unchanged, because the same process is occurring. The waves of the sea are opposites interacting to generate energy. The waves of time are opposites interacting to contain eternity. All things are a wave. Your DNA is a wave. From a certain point of view, this is just a question of alternating black and white shapes or forms.

Plato sought the Great Chain of Being because it has a source, a center. Know the center, and you know the source. Know the source and you know the process. Know the process and you may master it. Master the process and you master the world.

Attack an enemy from the front, at his strongest point, and he will concentrate his forces. Drive him back through raw force and pressure, and he will fall back upon his reserves, becoming stronger and more determined. This is a costly way to make war. Only fools enter into it, and institutions that have spent generations in the study of conflict and the ways to victory are unlikely to produce large numbers of thinkers who embrace this limited approach. There is a tendency to enshrine and emulate those regarded as the very best. The generally recognized military and combat masters of nearly every society share in their works and their endeavors evidence of a general disdain for this kind of war.

Attack an enemy where he does not anticipate, where he sees no threat, when he is distracted or unconcerned, and his whole defense may collapse. Indeed, his whole enterprise may desert and dissolve.

Attack an enemy by means that the enemy does not recognize as conventional, threaten his resources down to their very core – the people – and he will militarize and become more watchful. Perpetuate a process of constant unexpected attacks where the enemy had not perceived a target, and he will come to view every level and element of his enterprise as a potential target. This transforms the enemy: his state becomes ossified and in places petrified [bone may move; stone cannot, unless Merlin is near]. He becomes paranoid; paranoia passes for wisdom. Such an enemy has defeated himself.

Attack an enemy such that he believes he is the victor, he is triumphant, he has the field, and the enemy will never even know the nature of your endeavors until it is far too late. So long as he sees triumph in his arms and glories in his seizures of strong points, he will be distracted from the reality of the situation. Infiltrate his institutions and remain concealed among his ranks, and your arms [humans are also weapons] may rise to positions of power within the body politic of the enemy. Once this invasion is achieved, in silence and under cover of illusions, the enemy is undone. Not only has he been conquered, he has been transformed. Be a fractal, and no force may stand against you.

In essence: Go Viral.

An alternative view of the Black and White duality of opposites is to render them mathematically, as a system of on-off switches. We may conceptualize this as a procession of zeroes and ones.

Drawing an enemy into a fight by baiting is an ancient tactic. To bait effectively is to win the public interest war before the fight even begins. Keep the public from caring, and a government beholden by custom to the popular will may proceed as it wishes: no one is watching. Make the public believe that an enemy of the state is the personal enemy of each citizen, and the will of the people is with the government. Convince people that there are a class of armed, racist, prejudiced, zealots attempting to twist the true meaning of Christmas, and Christmas lovers everywhere will rally around the standard of any hero willing to challenge these bastards.

Be careful what you come to stand for. A cunning enemy can use many means to make villains where only clowns exist.

Alex Jones is Bill Hicks… And oddly enough, he is also Piers Morgan. How did they do this interview, you ask? Greenscreen.

The point? Power politics has always required the elite who own a society to cooperate with the majority who perform the varied labors and tasks of the society, besides those associated with leadership and rule. This has meant various things in various periods. For the ancient Egyptians, a good solution to population management – and an excellent opportunity to train thousands of skilled laborers, engineers and architects for use on other building projects – was the construction of the Pyramids. For the Spartans, this meant the enslavement of a quarter million people to support the militaristic lifestyle of an elite of no more than 10,000. For Medieval kings, the answer lay in bonding people to land, and establishing a cooperative relationship with a centralized faith that sanctioned any order that led to stability and security, including serfdom and domination by a military aristocracy. Modern nations have their own version of this solution, and their own alliances with non governmental entities that nevertheless manage to govern. The yoke of power takes forms that are tolerated – and even appreciated – in any time.

But what if the troublesome matter of “the people” could be completely resolved? What if something more effective, obedient, predictable and readily controlled could be developed? Because human beings have terrible faults as a labor production system. Humans have jealousies and petty desires, demands for liberty and dreams of achievement. To steal work power from an individual requires that these factors be worked around, co-opted, or eliminated. In the end, this may take more effort than the benefits merit.

Fortunately, for tomorrow’s aristocrat, a solution is evolving today. Yes, I’m trotting out this tired old trope, and re-hashing ideas of yesteryear. It’s my job, after all. It’s what Wizards do when we aren’t off chasing shadows and illusions.

Robots aren’t just a looming nightmare vision used to galvanize gullible worker populations into forming unions, which in turn allows liberal leftists to edge good western capitalism ever closer to the socialist precipice. They are in fact the dream of ruling classes everywhere. With sophisticated automatons, human beings can be entirely replaced. The powerful will have no need of servile people when servile machines are more reliable and obedient and productive. This is the Thin Mechanical Line: a point at which it is more economical and more politically expedient to eliminate billions of people rather than to employ them.

The First Commandment on the Georgia Guidestones is to keep the human population under 500,000,000 people, “in perpetual balance with nature.”

Is this theoretical? Is it rhetorical? Is it causal or derivative? Somewhere, someone believes that 6.5 billion people need to die. Perhaps the person who believes this is alone. Perhaps there are a few others. Perhaps those who believe this have neither wealth nor power. Or perhaps they have both.

If people can be drawn into conflicts, and nations can be hornswoggled into suicidal deviations from policies of reason, then does it not stand to reason that a certain percentage of the human species would be able to do a little dark math, and come to a shocking conclusion: It is possible to engineer the end of humanity as a class-based social entity. Eliminate the proles, and the remainder live in a paradise. But who shall do the work?

Seriously people, get with it. We are running out of time. At the rate things are moving, you have maybe fifty years.

Symbol sets out of sacred geometry tell secrets. They convey metaphorical meanings to those who know the oral tradition. If you want to hide information, you develop a new technology to contain all other information. The shaman learned his tales in poetic form, with meter and rhyme as memory aides to the oral tradition. The invention of writing gave certain groups the opportunity to prevent their secrets from entering the general informational exchange. The invention of computers allowed for this again. The internet represents a new cleavage between the storage of information in the past and the modern repositories. If you want something to be unknown, don’t disseminate it at all.

Today, the best secrets are kept where there are no records at all.

Irony rules the universe, or more correctly, what we perceive as ironic seems somehow to be echoed in the character of all creation. Debate this point at length, if you wish; the irony is that you endeavor to debate it. Embrace irony in your doings, and you have power. Irony may both unmake and instruct. The Left Hand Path is comfortable with unmaking.

Millions work today in hundreds of different industries at all levels of valuation to develop the technologies that will one day – very soon – render those same millions [and billions of others] obsolete. When a wizard sees an irony, he knows wizardry is at work. A bad irony means bad magic – Black Magick. Of course, no such thing exists, but the people who practice it can still just be assholes who would rather have mindless slave robots than bother to open new frontiers for human exploration and endeavor. It is entirely possible that someone has done the Devil’s Arithmetic and discovered that creating a future that benefits the majority of humanity is far more expensive than creating one in which the majority of humanity is eliminated. Morality and spirituality are of no importance to materialists focused only upon ignoring the Sound of Time and listening instead to the clink of gold.

What will wake you?


Conspiracy Theories

Chatham House – The Open Conspiracy Organization Emerged 100 Years Ago

HG Wells  in “The Open Conspiracy. Blue Prints for a World Revolution”(1928) wrote that in the twentieth century the world entered a dangerous phase of development, which could end in catastrophe and even destruction of mankind. The only way to prevent a catastrophe, Wells instructed, is the elimination of sovereign states and the creation of a One World Government, headed by a small group of people – representatives of the intellectual elite and big business.

The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution

The idea of ​​world domination has been nurtured for centuries by various secret societies (Templars, Freemasons, Illuminati). However, their plans and activities were hidden from the eyes of the authorities and the people. In the twentieth century, there was an argument to open these plans. And it was necessary to hurry, because scientific and technological progress was accelerating, remaining uncontrollable. The arms race continued and accelerated in exactly the same way.

At the 1919 Paris Peace Conference, these issues were discussed openly. It was decided to create the League of Nations, through which the British and Americans expected to begin building a new world order. True, there were disagreements between the ruling circles of the United States and Great Britain. London believed that the ideal basis for a united world was the British Empire, over which“the sun never sets.” In Washington, it was believed that America became the No. 1 power after the First World War and that it was she who should lead the movement towards a new world order.

Colonel House
Colonel House

However, both in the USA and Great Britain there were politicians who considered these imperial ambitions to be “prejudices of nationalism”, considering themselves a single elite of the highest Anglo-Saxon race. Such was Edward Mandel House  (1858-1938) – diplomat, adviser to President  Woodrow Wilson  (Colonel House). Lord Alfred Milner  (1854-1925), one of the key figures in the cabinet of David Lloyd George, was also a consistent supporter of Anglo-Saxon mondialism.

Lord Alfred Milner
Lord Alfred Milner

Colonel House was very upset when, while at a conference in Paris, he learned that Washington had rejected US participation in the League of Nations, the provisions of which were laid down in the Versailles Peace Treaty. He very much hoped that the League of Nations would become an instrument for the creation of a United State. After that, in the same place, in Paris, Colonel House met with British partners. They agreed that two organizations would be created in the United States and Great Britain, closely interacting and implementing the Anglo-Saxon project of building a new world order.

The first of these organizations was established a hundred years ago, in the summer of 1920. It was the  British Institute of International Affairs (BIIA) , renamed toThe Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA)  in 1926  and still exists under that name. The Institute is also known as Chatham House, which is the name of the building in which it is located (next to Westminster Palace in central London). In 1961, the  RIIA  changed location, but the Chatham House name remained.

The preparatory work for the establishment of the  RIIA  was carried out by  Lionel Curtis , Lord Milner’s secretary. The status of the institute is a non-governmental non-profit organization that exists at the expense of voluntary donations. The first donation of £ 2,000 was made by Thomas Lamont  of J.P. Morgan Bank. John D. Rockefeller  has contributed  £ 8,000 annually to the RIIA since 1932. Later, the  RIIA  began to regularly receive large regular donations from American charitable foundations (the Rockefeller, Carnegie, and others).

The first head of the institute was  Robert Cecil  (1864-1958) – British lawyer, parliamentary, public and statesman, active employee and ideologist of the League of Nations, winner of the 1937 Nobel Peace Prize (for services to the League of Nations). Lionel Curtis was promoted to RIIA Honorary Secretary. The leadership of the institute also included former Foreign Minister  Edward Gray , former Prime Minister  Arthur Balfour , Lord Lothian, renowned English economist  John Maynard KeynesAlfred Zimmerman  (Oxford professor, author of The League of Nations and the Rule of Law). Zimmermann had a capable student, Arnold Toynbee (1889-1975). On Zimmerman’s recommendation, Toynbee became the institute’s first paid employee. Toynbee was later appointed director of the institute. At Chatham House,  Toynbee played the leading role for three decades (1925-1955). He directed scientific research and was at the same time a high-ranking officer of the British  MI6  (intelligence) service. Much of the RIIA research was done on behalf of MI6 .

Arnold Toynbee
Arnold Toynbee

RIIA did not arise out of nowhere. It became a superstructure over the rather secret organization “Round Table”. According to historians, this society arose as a secret in 1891 in South Africa at the initiative of Cecil John Rhodes (1853-1902), a famous figure of British imperialism, who linked his life with the British colonial expansion in South Africa. Rhodes, a gold and diamond miner in South Africa, was associated with the Rothschilds. In 1910, the Rothschilds established the Round Table in London; the main public figure for the Round Table was Lord Alfred Milner. During the Lord’s lifetime, the Round Table was often called the Milner Group. Many historians believe that at the beginning of the 20th century the composition of the Round Table and the composition of the Committee of 300 (the world elite).

As Nicholas Hagger notes  in The Syndicate, the history of the creation of a secret world government and the methods of its influence on world politics and economy ”, the activities of the Round Table had two contours – external (open activity) and internal (secret activity). The task of the Round Table, writes the famous American historian  Carroll Quigley (1910-1977) in the book Tragedy and Hope, was “no less than the creation of a world system of financial control, concentrated in private hands and capable of influencing the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system will be completely feudally governed by the central banks of the world, acting in accordance with secret agreements concluded at frequent personal meetings and conferences. Quigley was very fond of the Round Table, being the official historian of this society.

The Round Table set out the task of creating a world government governed by international bankers. Many researchers of the Round Table activities believe that the program of this organization as a whole coincides with the program of the Illuminati Order in the 18th century. The successors of the Illuminati, members of the Round Table, viewed England as an Atlantic force, not a European one, and counted on the creation of a federation of English-speaking countries. Milner has established Roundtable Groups in South Africa, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India and CIF. They were all run from England. They included the most famous politicians of the British government, and they were all devoted to the idea of ​​world government. The Roundtable has always wanted to transform the British Empire into a federal system that would eventually include both the United Kingdom and the United States.

The RIIA  was a continuation of the Round Table. After the death of Lord Milner in 1925, references to the Round Table became rare, and more often people began to speak of the Royal Institution. In 1931, Toynbee gave a speech in Copenhagen, in which he declared:  

“We are currently working with all who can make all the nation-states of our world forget about the mysterious power called sovereignty. And we constantly deny what we really do .

Nicholas Hagger believes that Toynbee was more American than British, as most of the funding came from overseas, from the Rockefellers:  

“For 40 years, Toynbee was actively involved in the RIIA’s efforts to create a world government. In his writings, Toynbee argues that nation states are withering away and will be supplanted by the “Rockefeller” world government. Although Toynbee’s work is fascinating, it is unfortunately completely unreliable .

Toynbee was a prominent member of the Fabian Society, ideologically close to the Labor Party. Toynbee and his associates Herbert Wells,  Bertrand RussellBernard Shaw, brothers Julian and Aldous Huxley did not rule out that the international socialist movement would become one of the possible ways to create the One State. In particular, Toynbee and his associates were very impressed by the Bolsheviks’ commitment to internationalism, although the Fabians and employees of the Royal Institute did not share communist views.

Among those who surrounded Toynbee, many understood that the building of the One State was a task for the distant future. It is necessary to move towards the cherished goal gradually. The creation of a united Europe, in which individual states would dissolve their sovereignty, was considered as a closer goal. Toynbee managed to live up to this time, when the Treaty of Rome was signed in 1957 by six European states (1957), and later the European Economic Community (EEC) began to be created.

A year after the establishment of the RIIA, a mirror institution was created on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean, called the  Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) . The origins of the organization were Colonel House and  Paul Warburg  (1868-1932) – one of the initiators of the creation of the US Federal Reserve System. CFR members   included Woodrow Wilson, Colonel House, and a number of other influential politicians, bankers and businessmen. Particularly noteworthy are members of the Council such as  John Foster Dulles  (served as Secretary of State under President  Eisenhower ) and his brother  Alain Dulles (future first head of the CIA). A close informal relationship was established between John Dulles and Arnold Toynbee. John Dulles, as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Rockefeller Foundation, has helped ensure that the Royal Institution receives regular financial support from the Foundation.

All publications on the Royal Institution usually refer to the  Chatham House Rule . It assumes that participants in closed meetings have no right to disclose the authorship of those other opinions outside the small circle of RIIA members  . Opinions can be published, but as impersonal. The rule is intended to encourage maximum openness and frankness in internal meetings. The official mouthpiece of the institute is International Affairs  and World Review .

Since 2005, the Royal Institution has established a prize – the  Chatham House Prize . It is awarded annually to “the statesman or organization that Chatham House members believe have made the most important contribution to improving international relations in the past year .” 

Continue Reading

Conspiracy Theories

Meteorite as a false flag? Shadow government prepares kinetic orbital strike

According to watchers, citing top NASA officials, on September 24, 2020 at 11:18 UTC, an asteroid designated as 2020 SW will approach the Earth.

The asteroid is small, about 10 meters, but the distance will also be quite small – 0.07 LD / 0.00019 AU / 28 423 km / 17 661 miles:

Meanwhile Express, again with reference to the nice guys from NASA reports that two more asteroid rocks are flying towards us – RH6 2020 and RQ3 2020, which will pass by the Earth in the next day. Both asteroids are about 50 meters in diameter, the distance to them will be crazy (about 10 LD), so the probability of something falling to Earth is excluded. However, the options may be somewhat different.

As the famous American conspiracy theorist Michael Salla recalls in his video for September 16, the Earth may collide not with an asteroid, but with a real orbital bombardment. Cleverly, this is called “kinetic orbital impact“:

As you can see from this explanatory video, a satellite placed in orbit can launch heavy and large tungsten rods on the Earth, the impact of which will be comparable in force to a meteorite impact. That is, practically an atomic bomb, but without undesirable damaging factors in the form of radioactive contamination.

Michael is a person known without any exaggeration and he has been studying the topic of orbital bombing for many years, suggesting that sooner or later the Deep State will use these weapons to organize one or another false flag. In particular, Michael posted another big article about this at the end of August.

When Michael Salla was just starting to raise awareness on this topic, they laughed at him, because people did not believe that certain intruders would shoot such things at their country. But much has changed since then, and the same fires in California leave no doubt about the deliberate arson. Therefore, if someone could encroach on California from orbit / from an airplane, then why not strike, for example, on New York?

In light of this possibility, any reports about asteroids are already suggestive, especially if these asteroids are trumped at all angles. There are also conspiracy theorists, who could well have given information – tomorrow a large stone will fall on Earth, but just do not tell anyone, since we told you the information in secret. And when something falls from heaven, everyone will know, there will be no need to explain anything to anyone.

On the other hand, something really flies near the Sun: If we assume that it is Nibiru, which brought a cloud of asteroids with it and these asteroids begin to fall on their heads, then the authorities may try to hide even this. And in this situation, people such as Michael Salla, who are sometimes called by the term “useful fools” by the special services, will become especially useful. That is, a person, speaking from a pure heart and not in any cooperation with the FBI / CIA, brought to the people information about some kind of “orbital strike”, which could be blamed for everything and even then start a small retaliatory nuclear war.

In general, the options can be different and, as it were, mutually exclusive, nevertheless, with any of the options, something healthy falls on the city and the people living there will absolutely not care whether it flew in Nibiru, or is it an orbital strike, or even a nuclear war.

That is why the probability of a false flag with bombing from orbit must be borne in mind – especially when NASA publicly discovers something there or conducts exercises about meteorite fall. As Michael Salla reminds, according to the scenario of the last NASA / FEMA exercises, the meteorite arrived in 2020, on September 20

Continue Reading

Conspiracy Theories

The possibility of Planet X being a ship planet

On September 8-10, 2020, several new videos were posted online by different accounts, in which people captured, as it seemed to them, Nibiru:

Unfortunately, the authors of such videos do not always indicate the exact time of recordings, which makes them difficult to be verified, however, will base them on the date of September 8 and see what the telescopes showed on that day. 

The first service we will turn to for verification will be George Mason University, which kindly introduces the public to photographs of the Lasco C2 telescope:

 As you can see, to the right of the Sun (from the point of view of an observer on Earth), a coronal mass ejection slightly illuminated a round object. Perhaps, of course, we have seen this, so let’s turn to another source – the CACTus software, which was created to track solar flares:

Something round actually dangles near the Sun

Unfortunately, all telescopes are controlled by officials, and the officials, as we know, are tricky – this is clearly seen from the videos that they post to the public. The frame rate is one frame per hour or so – that is, the frames are carefully selected and filtered to those that can be shown to the masses, and those that should not be shown in any case. 

Fortunately, Mr. Planet X News, a nybirologist with twenty years of experience, has some kind of contacts with light adepts, and from time to time they leaked deleted frames to him. For example – frames for the same on September 8, time 12:24 or so:

Thus, it seems that there is now some kind of round object around the Sun, which makes a full revolution in aproximately 7 days. Therefore, one week it is seen to the right of the Sun, one week – to the left of the Sun. Therefore, everything seems to be clear. Nevertheless, both our readers and we, as honest researchers, have some questions. 

The first question is, why can’t we see Nibiru? Why is it not seen by billions of people? Why is it only seen occasionally? The answer to this question is obvious:

This is already a secondary question and is not the subject of this material, so we turn to the second question – Kepler’s laws. 

According to these laws, the planet under consideration, revolving around the star, moves not in a circle, but along an ellipse, in which two points are distinguished: perihelion is the point of the orbit closest to the Sun, and aphelion is the most distant point of the orbit.

 Nibiru, in theory, as if at perihelion

If we consider celestial mechanics, it is completely incomprehensible: how can Nibiru be in a circular orbit if it should rotate in an ellipse? The planets do not change their orbits – this is the law of astronomy. If Nibiru changed its orbit to a circular one and is now wandering somewhere between the Sun and Mercury, then it will not be able to return to an elliptical orbit and leave the solar system. Meanwhile, according to the legends, the mystery planet must leave us for five hundred years. It’s a direct, insoluble paradox. 

This kind of paradox can be resolved very simply if we assume that Nibiru is not just a planet, but a planet that has been turned into a spaceship. Once in a while, the Anunnaki visit the solar system – they slow down, descend from an elongated orbit to a circular one, fill their batteries from the sun, harvest on a farm, and then fly away on their own business – until the batteries are exhausted and the refrigerators run out of food. Then the cycle repeats. 

In the light of these considerations, a third question arises: when will the Anunnaki bask in the sun enough and begin to harvest? 

Continue Reading