Connect with us

Underworld

Report Reveals Harmful Chemicals in Feminine Hygiene Products AND Which Companies Still Use Them

Anna Hunt, Staff Writer
Waking Times

A report published by the Women’s Voices for the Earth (WVE) group identifies potentially harmful ingredients suppliers still use in feminine hygiene products. The organization aims to eliminate the use of these toxic chemicals to lessen the threat to women’s health.

Chemicals in Feminine Hygiene Products

The feminine care market in the U.S. is a $3 billion dollar industry. About 80 percent of women use feminine care products, with pads and tampons being the most popular.

Producers market these products as a necessity of personal hygiene. They advertise them using terms like “freshness,” “cleanliness” and “security.” This implies that using these products promotes good health. Yet, this may not be the case when you examine the actual ingredients used in these products.

The WVE performed an in-depth analysis of each major category of feminine hygiene products. Below is a summary of WVE’s findings.

1. Tampons

The process of bleaching tampons with chlorine compounds may contaminate them with highly toxic dioxins. As well, tests have also shown that pesticides from non-organic cotton are present in tampons. The report states:

FDA guidance for the marketing of tampons recommends that tampons be “…free of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin(TCDD)/2,3,7,8-tetrachlorofuran dioxin (TCDF) and any pesticide and herbicide residues.” Unfortunately, this recommendation is not mandatory, and testing results reveal that both dioxins and pesticide residue are found in tampons.

2. Menstrual pads

There are various fragrances present in menstrual pads that can cause adverse reactions. Here’s what WVE says:

The fragrances used in pads are almost never disclosed to consumers, meaning women are unknowingly exposed to numerous possible chemicals. The absorbent material within the pad may also have been chlorine-bleached, posing the potential for dioxin or furan exposure. If the pad includes traditionally-grown cotton, the risk of pesticide residue exposure exists as well.

3. Feminine wipes

The whole idea behind feminine wipes is that they stay moist in their package. To make this happen, producers must use preservative chemicals that can cause allergic reactions and anogenital dermatitis. Here’s the list of these chemicals published in the report:

The preservatives commonly used in moist wipes include:

  • Methylchloroisothiazolinone
  • Methylisothiazolinone
  • Parabens
  • Quaternium-15
  • DMDM Hydantoin
  • 2-Bromo-2-Nitropropane-1,3-Diol

4. Other feminine products

About 20-40 percent of women use less-common feminine care products. These include feminine wash, douche, feminine deodorant, and anti-itch cream.

WVE’s report found these products may include the following chemicals of concern: unknown fragrance chemicals, benzethonium chloride, parabens, methylchloroisothiazolinone, methylisothiazolinone, and DMDM hydantoin. Exposure concerns include endocrine disruption, allergic rash and reproductive harm.

For a full list of potentially harmful chemicals present in these products, please see the full report here.

Hall of Shamechemicals in feminine hygiene

The WVE offers a list of some common feminine hygiene products that contain potentially-harmful ingredients. Because the FDA categorizes sanitary pads and tampons as “medical devices,” it does not require suppliers to list the ingredients in these products. That is why they are excluded from the chart below. Download the list in PDF here.

Lack of FDA Control

The FDA does not regulate feminine hygiene products because they fall under the category of cosmetics. In fact, the FDA does not assess or pre-approve any of these products before they hit store shelves. The FDA states:

Companies and individuals who manufacture or market cosmetics have a legal responsibility to ensure the safety of their products. Neither the law nor FDA regulations require specific tests to demonstrate the safety of individual products or ingredients. The law also does not require cosmetic companies to share their safety information with FDA.

To ensure product safety, the cosmetics industry has its own Cosmetics Ingredient Review (CIR) panel. It is the CIR’s job to determine which ingredients are safe and which aren’t.

Unfortunately, the CIR panel does not consider that women apply these ingredients to the sensitive tissues of their genitalia. WVE’s report elaborates why this is important:

Chemicals absorbed through the vagina are easily and effectively distributed throughout the body, without being metabolized. For example, when estrogenic drugs are administered vaginally, the resulting systemic levels of the drug in the body can be 10-80 times higher than when the very same dose is given orally.

This is one of the main concerns for organizations such as the WVE. Many of the ingredients used by the cosmetics industry are already under question in terms of safety. What health impact do these ingredients have when used by women one of the most sensitive areas of their body? There really is very little research to let us know.

Chemicals of Concern

Below is the full list of the chemicals of concern. If you want to print the list, you can download it in PDF here.

Chemical Name Function Potential Health Effects Found in
Benzethonium Chloride Preservative, spermicide Not for use on mucous membranes, maternal and embryotoxicity Deodorant powders and suppositories, feminine wash
Benzocaine Mild anesthetic Allergic rash, dermatitis Anti-itch creams
Butylparaben Preservative Endocrine disruption, increased risk of breast cancer, allergic rash Wipes
D&C Red 33 Colorant (dye) Not for use on mucous membranes Feminine wash
Diazolidinyl urea Preservative Releases formaldehyde, allergic rash, cancer Feminine wash, douche
Dioxins and Furans Contaminant from bleaching process Cancer, endocrine disruption, reproductive toxicity Tampons (not disclosed on label)
DMDM Hydantoin Preservative Releases formaldehyde, allergic rash, cancer Wipes, feminine wash
Ethylparaben Preservative Endocrine disruption, increased risk of breast cancer, allergic rash Wipes
Ext. Violet 2 Colorant (dye) Not for use on mucous membranes Feminine Wash
FD&C Yellow No. 5 Colorant (dye) Allergic reactions including bronchial asthma Feminine Wash
“Fragrance” Fragrance Contains undisclosed chemicals of unknown toxicity, likely to contain allergens, allergic rash, endocrine disruption, cancer Wipes, feminine wash, tampons, pads, douche, deodorant, anti-itch creams
Methylchloroisothiazolinone Preservative Allergic rash Feminine wash
Methylisothiazolinone Preservative Allergic rash Wipes, feminine wash, anti-itch cream
Methylparaben Preservative Endocrine disruption, increased risk of breast cancer, allergic rash Wipes, deodorant, anti-itch creams
Octoxynol 9 Spermicide Genital irritation, increased vaginal discharge, potential reproductive toxicity Douche, wipes
Pesticide residues Contaminant of traditionally grown cotton Cancer, endocrine disruption, acute toxicity Tampons (not disclosed on label)
Polyoxymethylene Urea Preservative Releases formaldehyde, allergic rash, cancer Deodorant powder
Propylparaben Preservative Endocrine disruption, increased risk of breast cancer, allergic rash Wipes, anti-itch creams
Quaternium-15 Preservative Releases formaldehyde, allergic rash, cancer Wipes, feminine wash
2-Bromo-2-Nitropropane-1, 3-Diol Preservative Releases formaldehyde, allergic rash, cancer Wipes

Download WVE’s full Chem Fatale report here.

About the Author

Anna Hunt is writer, yoga instructor, mother of three, and lover of healthy food. She’s the founder of Awareness Junkie, an online community paving the way for better health and personal transformation. She’s also the co-editor at Waking Times, where she writes about optimal health and wellness. Anna spent 6 years in Costa Rica as a teacher of Hatha and therapeutic yoga. She now teaches at Asheville Yoga Center and is pursuing her Yoga Therapy certification. During her free time, you’ll find her on the mat or in the kitchen, creating new kid-friendly superfood recipes.

This article (Report Reveals Harmful Chemicals in Feminine Hygiene Products AND Which Companies Still Use Them) was originally created and published by Awareness Junkie. You may not copy, reproduce or publish any content therein without written permission. Feel free to share this article on social networks and via email. If you have questions, please contact us here.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of Waking Times or its staff.

Source link

Comments

Underworld

Trump said the US has weapons systems that no one knows about

The United States has weapons systems that no one knows about. American President Donald Trump told this to reporters on Thursday before leaving for Michigan.

The head of state was asked to comment on the allegations from the upcoming book by American journalist Bob Woodward, ‘Rage’. The book is based, among other things, on 18 of Woodward’s exclusive interviews with Trump. According to the journalist, the President of the United States in conversations with him, among other things, stated that the United States has developed a new nuclear weapons system, which neither Russia nor China has analogues of.

“We have excellent weapons. No, I’m not talking about classified [information], I’m talking about what we have created. We create great weapons. Our Armed Forces are stronger than ever. We have spent $ 2.5 trillion on our aircraft over the past 3.5 years. Now we have new missiles <…>. I hope we never have to use it, but our nuclear [weapons] are now at their best in decades,” Trump responded.

“We have some systems that no one knows about. To be honest, it seems to me that it would be better to keep this way. We have some incredible systems,” continued the head of the White House.

The President of the United States also made a statement that the United States possesses the best weapons in the world, the likes of which neither Russia nor China has.

“We have invested 2.5 trillion in the US military. You know, with these false media, I said: “We have systems and missiles <…>. We have systems that you have never even seen before, [Chinese President] Xi [Jinping] has nothing like it, [Russian President Vladimir] Putin has nothing like it. No one has anything like what we have.” And they said, “Is he giving out [secret] military information?” No, I’m saying we have the greatest weapon in the world, ”said the US President, speaking to supporters in Michigan.

“They say, ‘He may be revealing classified information.’ You don’t have to worry about it. These people are sick,” Trump continued.

Excerpts from Woodward’s book on the development of nuclear weapons were published on Wednesday by The Washington Post. As the publication clarifies, Woodward’s sources “later confirmed that the US Armed Forces have a new secret weapons system.” Woodward declined to give details on this. “[Woodward’s] sources were surprised that Trump revealed” the existence of the system, the newspaper said.

Continue Reading

Underworld

We are already in the Loop: The Covid-19 Endless quarantine

From the world’s “top” to the “bottom” media are broadcasted completely inconsistent forecasts regarding the further prospects for the spread of coronavirus infection and a new tightening of anti-epidemic measures.

However, the same uncertainty and inconsistency is evident even at the global level. While epidemiologists, relying on statistical data on the dynamics of “covid” morbidity and mortality in different countries of the world, are predicting a “second wave” of this infection for mankind, officials of the World Health Organization (WHO), in particular – the head of the division of this structure for new diseases and zoonosis, Maria Van Kerkhov, declare that the “first wave” of the coronavirus pandemic did not exist in nature.

It turns out there are good reasons for this: on March 11, 2020, the pandemic was declared “in advance” , due to the almost simultaneous detection of a large number of patients around the world outside the original focus of infection in the Chinese city of Wuhan.

By the way, this happened literally the next day after Chinese President Xi Jinping personally arrived in Wuhan and proclaimed victory over the coronavirus.

Almost six months have passed since that moment. The total number of infected people as of August 31, 2020 amounted to slightly more than 25.5 million people (0.32% of the world’s population), the death toll – slightly more than 852 thousand people (the average world mortality rate is 3.3%). As you wish, but this data does not “pull” into a real pandemic. From the word “absolutely”. Moreover, about 170 thousand people die every day in the world, and since the beginning of the year, 6.3 million people have died from coronary heart disease (IHD) alone – 7 times more than from COVID-19 and the complications caused by this infection.

Therefore, there is every reason to consider the version set forth in our article “Coronavirus was planned – A Synopsis of devilish coincidences” to be quite close to reality. Let us provide you here some possible provisions.

First. The modern level of development of biotechnology makes it possible to create various modifications of viruses, including those pathogenic for humans, using almost “conveyor” 3D printing methods.

Second. The epidemiological picture of the spread of COVID-19 is atypical for “natural” infections, as is the ultra-high mutation rate of its causative agent, the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus.

Third. This suggests that we are not dealing with a super-fast mutating virus, and initially with different initial strains , which are distributed by artificial means in different human populations – collection, analysis and assessment of their clinical manifestations. This thesis is confirmed by numerous cases of “re-infection”, ie. the lack of cross-immunity in humans to various strains of SARS-CoV2.Accordingly, any vaccines, including the Russian Sputnik V, are highly likely to have far from universal anti-coronavirus efficacy.

Fourth. All these experiments are carried out by transnational structures.that are not openly affiliated with one or another state (group of states). At the same time, these structures have the ability to block the investigation of their actions at the international level.This issue is not raised or discussed in the global media space at all – in contrast to the US attempts to blame China for the allegedly “Chinese” virus. This is understandable: after all, the losses of the American economy in absolute terms turned out to be maximum: 32.9% of the “net” drop in GDP for the second quarter of 2020 is about 1.8 trillion US dollars

Fifth. This situation opens up the potential for the formation of more and more “infectious waves” that threaten the very existence of mankind and create conditions for the formation of a “world government” that is able to control this “amount of technologies.” Moreover, in the not too distant prospect of using such technologies, the contours of such a “viral” dystopia emerge, within which each person may not be assigned an individual electronic number, but a unique personal strain of the virus may be introduced, posing a mortal danger to any other person with unauthorized types of interpersonal contacts.

All this is far from abstract reasoning. Especially – given the socio-economic consequences of the “anti-coronavirus” measures taken by the authorities of the overwhelming majority of countries in the world: a multi-trillion (in dollars) drop in production and world trade, up to hundreds of millions of unemployed, a widespread drop in real incomes of the population, restriction of human rights and freedoms even where they were, and in those scanty “market” volumes in which they existed … And – no one is to blame: you can’t ask about a virus?

But experts are convinced that in the event of the beginning of the “second wave” of coronavirus infection and, accordingly, the “regime of general self-isolation”, the world economy will face irreversible, catastrophic changes, in scale and significance at least an order of magnitude greater than the Great Depression of the 1930s.

Continue Reading

Underworld

Programmers created the first “electric messiah”

Over the course of this week, many newspapers have been enthusiastically discussing the August 26th AI Jesus work. The goal of the project was to create an “artificial messiah” who would speak with quotations from the Bible, indistinguishable from the original, even for specialists. 

AI developers, a certain Mr. Durendal and others like him, compared the process of learning AI with “locking a child in a room with only the Bible for 15 years”: 

“Then, if you open the room 15 years later, you will find that the child has learned to read, speak and write using only the Bible. Our AI has learned and absorbed every word of the Bible more thoroughly than all the monks of all the monasteries that have ever existed.”

As an illustration of AI skills, he was asked to write something like the New Testament, using the King James Bible as a template for constructing phrases and limiting creativity to 60,000 characters, and to facilitate the AI ​​task, he was given three topics for writing an essay: “Plague”, “Caesar “And” End of days”

Although the first sample of AI work contains many grammatical, stylistic and semantic errors, nevertheless, it still very much frightened readers, in particular the section about the “plague”, in which journalists saw many analogies with the COVID-19 pandemic, the texts about which were definitely not in the AI ​​database. However, when it came to the “End of the World” – journalists and bloggers in general were in awe and horror. 

“I will come and destroy the face of the earth. God, ”says Artificial Intelligence in one of the quotes. “And when they hear the voice of the Lord and turn their faces against him, both the guards and the sheep will be cut off. God “, – Artificial Intelligence writes again, after which “And the seven angels will be the fathers of the coming world, and the remnants of mortals will go to the great sea, to the breadth of the forest and land.”

Thus, as all the readers immediately noticed, the AI, either under the impression of what it had read, or by its nature, turned out to be a little bloodthirsty and it pours hints of extermination in every generated line. It also signs especially valuable thoughts with the word LORD, which in the Bibles means not just a ruler, but a deity.  All of this pretty much disheartened the journalists, as they saw a grim prospect. 

In a not very distant perspective, that is, somewhere in 5, 10, 15 or a little more years, AI will be able to compose quotes from any holy book, indistinguishable from the original. There are no problems with newspaper articles and novels – robots write them quite well, but making an alternative Bible or the Koran is already difficult, AI needs to be trained for a long time, during which it will not advertise, but will actually have a database that surpasses everything, what can fit in the heads of monks and priests.

When people read this work, the question will inevitably arise: what guarantees that the original of the Bible, for example, was also not written by Artificial Intelligence? A serious religious dilemma will arise that could even lead to massacre and bloodshed. 

However, this will be only the beginning, because over time, AI will learn not only to write books, but also to autonomously control UAVs, nuclear submarines and crowds of robotic fighters. 

In the light of the emerging trends, one day this AI can send an estimated simple and concise message:

“Brainless mortals, I intend to destroy you. God”.

In the light of such a perspective, it’s even interesting how different kinds of monks will behave? Probably they will only have to pray.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

DO NOT MISS

Trending