Connect with us

Conspiracy Theories

Project Blue Book | Unidentified Flying Objects

If you ever wondered if the show, “Project Blue Book”, premiering on the 8th of January 2019 is a work of fiction, let us quickly assure you that it is not. In fact, what this show is based on is a true story of a government project that was carefully swept under the project. The project, as you might well know, is the Project Blue Book.

What you may think you know about this project might not be completely true. However, we shall now try to delve into what really happened with this investigation, what its mission is, and why it had to be aborted and kept classified for a long time.

To go back to the beginning, we have to head as far back as 1947. This was just as the cold war was starting. There was suspicion in the air, and there were many reasons for this.

So, when a businessman and pilot known as Kenneth Arnold made a report on June 24, 1947, it quickly raised the fever.

Kenneth’s report was clear and direct: He had observed nine flat disc-like aircraft near Mt. Rainer, Washington. They were flying at incredibly high speed.

His description of them was so vivid and the press, who quickly dubbed those aircrafts as “flying saucers,” was the beginning of thousands of other similar reports.

Kenneth Arnold, shown in 1966 with a drawing of a flying saucer, reportedly spent “many long hours of fruitless flying with a camera, trying and failing to find anything like his saucers again.” (AP)

In fact, between that first incident in 1947 and when Project Blue Book was terminated in 1969, a total of 12, 618 sightings of strange things moving in the sky had been reported across the United States.

When the Project Blue Book was carefully shut down, the U.S. Air Force gave a number of grounds that have since been its official stand:

  • No UFO reported, investigated, and evaluated by the Air Force has ever given any indication of threat to our national security;
  • There has been no evidence submitted to or discovered by the Air Force that sightings categorized as “unidentified” represent technological developments or principles beyond the range of present-day scientific knowledge; and
  • There has been no evidence indicating that sightings categorized as “unidentified” are extraterrestrial vehicles.

This is part of the official statement, but a lot more was involved in the case of Project Blue Book. So, why would the U.S. Air Force do that?

Was Project Blue Book a failure or was it just a fluke? There are a number of things to note.

Keep in mind that the U.S Air Force is the agency in charge of the surety of the airspace all over the nation.

It was at the beginning of the cold war when reports started rolling in. The initial reaction was a bit frantic at first. There were suspicions about which country may be responsible.

Many suspected that these strange aircrafts could be from the Soviet Union. Others wondered if it was another country.

With the suspicion, The Air Force quickly launched what was then known as Project Sign. This would be followed by other investigations, Project Blue Book is one of them.

Project Sign

Project Sign was the initial response, but it only lasted for just over a year. At first, it appeared as if The U.S. Air Force were trying to actually discover what the unidentified flying objects were. Project Sign was actually taken somewhat seriously.

According to the report of a captain of the U.S Air Force, Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, the intelligence specialists at the Air Technical Intelligence Center (ATIC) were so confident of getting answers to the UFO problem within a year at most.

(By the way, you might want to keep the name of Captain Edward J. Ruppelt in mind, because he would later become a Project Blue Book director and the author of a book titled “The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects”).

Screenwriter Francis Martin with Albert M. Chop, and Captain Edward J. Ruppelt of the Air Force’s Project Blue Book

Back to Project Sign, the UFO problem that the intelligence specialists at ATIC were looking to solve had nothing to do with if these UFOs existed or not.

It was more about where it is from. Could it be the Russians at work or should we really gaze into space for answers? Could these UFOs have come from some other planet?

Their findings would cause an internal split inside the group. There were those who believed that the UFOs were indeed from outside the planet Earth, while there were others who maintained that it couldn’t be true.

By the time the Project Sign ended, the official results were inconclusive. In their report, the flying saucers were neither confirmed nor denied.

But that really wasn’t the end of it. A document was authored by the project in 1948, and the document was called “The Estimate of the Situation”.

This document was sent straight up the command chain of the U.S. Air Force. Ruppelt revealed that the majority of the specialists who worked on Project Sign were particularly impressed by one of the many reports of sightings.

This particular report was the Chiles-Whitted UFO Encounter on the 24th of July, 1948. This incident involved two pilots whose Douglas DC-3 airliner was almost hit by a torpedo-shaped UFO. Most of the investigators actually believed this incident was true.

The conclusion was that the level of technology that must have gone into such an aircraft could not have been realistic for either the U.S. or the U.S.S.R. The only logical explanation was that it was from another planet. This belief was stated clearly in the document.

July 24, 1948 – Chiles-Whitted Case
Drawings by Chiles and Whitted of their UFO encounter in July 1948
News article on report by C.S. Chiles and J.B. Whitted from Blue Book files. From 1951 through 1953 Captain Edward J. Ruppelt was chief of Project Blue Book — the official Air Force investigation into the UFO phenomenon.

But guess what, the document was rejected by the Air Force for lack of physical evidence. What’s more, all copies were ordered to be destroyed. The U.S. Air Force would later deny the existence of this document, even resisting any attempt to use the Freedom of Information Act in getting a hold of it.

However, Ruppelt and several other sources confirmed the existence of this document. One of these sources was Dr. Allen Hynek. Dr. Hynek was a scientific consultant and UFO skeptic brought in to work on both Project Sign and Project Blue Book. His role and shocking transformation would be discussed shortly.

But Project Sign wasn’t shut down to start Project Blue Book. There was another project in-between. This project is called Project Grudge.

Project Grudge

Project Grudge is a fine example of how to appear productive when, in reality, you are busy doing nothing. Project Grudge was a total fluke set up with one single aim: debunk all reports and find natural explanations for those you can’t.

Needless to say, many of those “explanations” were completely illogical. Investigations were rarely conducted since the conclusion is already known. Any little investigation done was tailored to lead right back to the preconceived answer.

This continued until the UFO sighting reported around Fort Monmouth in New Jersey in September of 1951. A number of pilots and radar operators observed these fast-moving and highly maneuverable aircraft that are shaped like discs. It took a direct order by the head of Air Force intelligence at the Pentagon, Major General Charles P. Cabell, to swing the investigators into action.

When a meeting was called, it became clear that the investigators at Project Grudge had been taking all reports as a huge joke. This realization made General Charles P. Cabell push for the dissolution of Project Grudge and its replacement by Project Blue Book, the project intended to take the sightings really seriously.

Project Blue Book

With huge determination, Captain Edward J. Ruppelt (Remember him from Project Sign?) was put in charge of Project Blue Book, and work commenced immediately. It was Ruppelt that created the name Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) to replace the press-publicized “flying saucer.” Data were gathered and placed under high scrutiny.

Air Force Captain Edward J. Ruppelt (1923-1960), a brilliant young officer who assumed an important leadership role in Projects Sign, Grudge and Blue Book.

When the results of the study were released, it shocked the skeptics. A clean 22% of the 3200 reports studied were labeled as unknown. That means they couldn’t be explained away. That is huge, and the report shook the beliefs of many.

One of such people is the Astronomer, Dr. Allen Hynek, who was hired as a scientific consultant during Project Sign and Also for Project Blue Book. He was a straight UFO skeptic who worked at the time in the Department of Physics and Astronomy at Ohio State.

He had treated the whole thing has an utterly ridiculous fad that would go away soon enough. He would try debunking any of the sightings, claiming that there was surely a natural explanation. Sometimes, he would even find a ridiculous explanation, like one of his declarations in 1966 that left many people laughing.

After observing and conducting research for years with no easy explanation for some of what he personally saw and heard, Dr. Allen Hynek would later conclude that, indeed, these were not fads. The sightings of UFO were real and they point to something outside this planet.

This led him to become a passionate believer in what we now know as UFOs. He founded the Center for UFO Studies, wrote several books and was a technical advisor for “Close Encounters of the Third Kind,” an iconic film about UFOs released in 1977.

J. Allen Hynek cameos in the movie ‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind’ – Directed by Steven Spielberg

So, you would expect the Project Blue Book to gain international interest, right?

Well, think again. What followed was as strange as the UFO sightings themselves.

In 1953, Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, the director that had worked hard since the previous year to get out the report suddenly left the project. What was left of Project Blue Book was a shadow of itself, a device used for public relations.

Earlier in 1952, a panel of scientists had been convened by the CIA. After meeting for 12 hours over a period of 4 days, the reports worked on by Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, Dr. Allen Hynek, and many others were brushed under the carpet.

The idea was that, if given enough time, all those sightings could be explained away.

The motion of the meeting was switched to calming down the public. A public relations campaign was proposed to debunk and remove the “aura of mystery” from the UFOs, all in an attempt to take away the public’s attention.

Project Blue Book was stripped of most of its power and resources and was transformed into a debunking device. Of course, this frustrated Captain Edward J. Ruppelt, thus making him to leave.

When Major Robert J. Friend tried to resuscitate the project years later, he got little cooperation and even more limited budget.

Everything went downhill from there. In 1969, Project Blue Book was terminated and its file declassified.

But the damage has been done. Many reports have been debunked by the project after Rupelt left. Other documents related to UFO which were not held by the Project Blue Book still remain classified, despite pressures and lawsuits from private UFO groups.

And the public? Well, the public has moved on.

The later mission of Project Blue Book seemed to work more than the former.

While the U.S. Air Force would secretly continue their investigation, the public stance still remains.

Once again, the public is kept in the dark.

Comments

Conspiracy Theories

Moon Landing Conspiracy Theory Persists

The idea that the Moon landings were faked still remains one of the most enduring of all conspiracy theories.

Peter Knight – a professor of American Studies at the University of Manchester – explores the origins of the Moon landing conspiracy and why some people still believe that we never went to the Moon.

Bill Kaysing was a former US Navy officer who worked as a technical writer for one of the rocket manufacturers for NASA’s Apollo moon missions. He claimed that he had inside knowledge of a government conspiracy to fake the moon landings, and many conspiracy theories about the Apollo moon landings which persist to this day can be traced back to his 1976 book, We Never Went to the Moon: America’s Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle.

The basic template of the conspiracy theory is that NASA couldn’t manage to safely land a man on the moon by the end of the 1960s as President John F Kennedy had promised, so it only sent astronauts into Earth orbit. Conspiracy theorists then argue that NASA staged the moon landings in a film studio and that there are tell-tale signs on the footage and the photos that give the game away. They claim that NASA has covered up the elaborate hoax ever since.

Moon landing sceptics point to supposed clues such as photos that appear to show the astronauts in front of cross hairs that were etched on the camera glass, or a mysterious letter C visible on a moon rock. These and many other seeming anomalies have been debunked, but moon landing conspiracy theories have persisted in the popular imagination.

In the US, opinion polls indicate that between 5-10% of Americans distrust the official version of events. In the UK, a YouGov poll in 2012 found that 12% of Britons believed in the conspiracy theory. A recent survey found that 20% of Italians believe that the moon landings were a hoax, while a 2018 poll in Russia put the figure there as high as 57%, unsurprising given the popularity of anti-Western conspiracy theories there.

Ready to disbelieve

That Kaysing’s conspiracy theory took hold in mid-1970s America is in large part due to a wider crisis of trust in the country at the time. In 1971, citizens read the leaked Pentagon Papers, showing that the Johnson administration had been systematically lying about the Vietnam War. They tuned in nightly to the hearings about the Watergate break-in and subsequent cover-up.

A series of congressional reports detailed CIA malfeasance both at home and abroad, and in 1976, the House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded – in contrast to the Warren Commission more than a decade earlier – that there was a high probability that there had been a conspiracy to kill Kennedy. These revelations had helped fuel a wider shift in conspiracy thinking since the late 1960s, from a belief in external enemies, such as Communists, to the suspicion that the American state was itself conspiring against its citizens.

Moon landing conspiracy theories have proved particularly sticky ever since. To understand their popularity we need to consider their cultural context, as much as the psychological dispositions of believers.

As with the Kennedy assassination, they formed a new kind of conspiracy theorising. These theories reinterpret the publicly available evidence, finding inconsistencies in the official record, rather than uncovering suppressed information. Visual evidence is crucial: for all their scepticism, their starting point is that seeing is believing. In the realm of photo evidence, the assumption is that everyone can be a detective. In the conspiracy theory communities that emerged at the tail-end of the 1960s, the self-taught buff became central.

Constructed reality

The moon landing conspiracy theories also brought to the mainstream the notion that significant events are not what they seem: they have been staged, part of an official disinformation campaign. The idea that tragic events are created by “crisis actors” employed by the government has become the default explanation for many events today, from 9/11 to mass shootings. This type of conspiracy theory is particularly harmful – for example, parents of children killed in the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting have been relentlessly hounded by internet trolls claiming they are merely paid stooges.

However, the story that the lunar landings were staged also resonates with the more plausible notion that the space race itself was as much a Cold War spectacle as a triumph of the human spirit.

The 1978 Hollywood film Capricorn One did much to popularise moon landing conspiracy theories. Based on Kaysing’s book, it imagined that a Mars landing was faked in a film studio, tapping into conspiracy rumours that the moon landings themselves had been directed by Stanley Kubrick. This suggestive myth is based in part on the idea that special effects had become much more sophisticated with Kubrick’s 1968 film 2001 A Space Odyssey, although still far from the capabilities that the conspiracy theories suppose.

Even if they are far-fetched in factual terms, moon landing conspiracy theories nevertheless call up the more plausible possibility that in our media-saturated age reality itself is constructed, if not actually faked.

Peter Knight, Professor of American Studies, University of Manchester

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Continue Reading

Conspiracy Theories

Theorists Claim Glowing Orb Over Rome May Be Alien Technology

UFO conspiracy theories were unleashed as a clear daylight video showed a yellowish orb spiraling upward into the sky above the Italian capital.

A possible tad of alien activity was noted on Italian soil, as an unsuspecting family looked out of the window of their Roman villa to spot a bright, perfectly circular light hovering on the horizon. In a video posted online, people in the background can be heard asking in Italian: “What are they?”

Picked up by several media outlets, the video finally found it’s way to alien hunters, as conspiracy theorists theorize wildly over the object’s extraordinarily bright light.

“A luminous sphere was spotted and recorded with a mobile phone by a family living in the area of Villa Chigi in Rome,” according to popular YouTube channel UFOMania, while commenters shared whacky theories as to where the technology behind its construction could have originated from.

“It is a plasma drone. It’s got to be alien technology or something else, just understand that they are taking pictures of our landscape and maybe compared them to the old times,” one wrote, as another chimed in suggesting that it could be an alien abduction in progress.

“This is exactly how the several spheres we saw over a busy interstate outside Albany NY took off. This looks real to me,” they posted, intriguing the rest.

Skeptical observers ditched the extra-terrestrial mumbo-jumbo, however, arguing that in such a densely populated location there would have been many more sightings of the purported event.

Last week, prominent UFOlogist Scott C. Waring commented on a body that resembled a four-pronged alien spaceship right above the orbiting International Space Station, taking note of its unusual shape: “like nothing I’ve seen before,” he posted.

In a video first singled out of NASA’s livestream archives by YouTube channel Streetcap 1, a massive unidentified object can be seen whizzing swiftly past the space laboratory before taking a turn and moving back to its initial location in the background.

Sputniknews

Continue Reading

Conspiracy Theories

Residents of Brooklyn complain about a strange sound that makes you sick

In the Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn neighborhood, New York, for the past few months, people have been complaining about a strange annoying noise. They hear this noise both outside and in their apartments and at the same time it causes medical problems.

Some conspirologists find that the symptoms are very similar to those described by American diplomats. In the past two years, diplomats from the American embassies in Cuba and in China have heard strange noises from which they had unpleasant consequences.

Only last week, 15 Brooklyn residents appealed to the authorities with unpleasant sounds. However, no action was taken, because even the authorities could not figure out the source of the noise.

This high-pitched noise is much more annoying than the usual New York hum and at the same time affects the brain. Some people had the effects of this noise like a hangover, others felt a throbbing headache.

Another part of the inhabitants reported mental stress and pressure on the nasal sinuses. Even closing the windows did not help from the noise; it easily penetrated through the walls.

“I can not run away from it and this noise is felt anywhere in our block,” – says Drew Robbie.

Robbie tried to record the noise and posted on Twitter. The sound in the video is really depressing and it is unbearably long to listen.

Both local police and officials unsuccessfully seek the source of this sound.

A similar “sound attack” was conducted in March 2019 in Michigan. Conspiracy theorists believe that someone is testing the sonic weapon in public.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending