Throughout human history, infectious diseases have inflicted more harm than the bloodiest wars. Once more, official WHO statements regarding epidemic outbreaks are disseminated to the public. How can one not feel alarmed, especially on the brink of a potential global conflict? Would professionals, too, be taken aback by an epidemic outbreak amid escalating hostilities?
For the past three years, there has been persistent coverage on COVID-19, yet it is less commonly known that since 2020, we have faced two significant viral outbreaks: COVID-19 and Marburg virus. Were you aware of this?
On February 4, 2020, HHS Secretary Alex Azar issued a Notice of Declaration under the Public Emergency Preparedness Act for COVID-19 Medical Countermeasures. The COVID-19 PREP Act Declaration has been extended and amended eleven times, with the most recent amendment by HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra taking effect on May 11, 2023. Additionally, on December 9, 2020, Secretary Azar announced an extension of the PREP Act to include countermeasures for the Marburg virus, coinciding with the days leading up to the global distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.
The Marburg virus is a highly virulent disease similar to Ebola, known for causing severe hemorrhagic fever in humans. Information on it is limited and originates from 1967. It is often described as clinically indistinguishable from Ebola but is considered more lethal. According to the CDC, transmission occurs through contact with infected blood or bodily fluids, not through airborne droplets. Notable outbreaks were recorded in three laboratories—two in Germany and one in Yugoslavia—in 1967, happening concurrently. The majority of cases, amounting to thirty, were reported in Germany across two labs, with only two cases in Yugoslavia.
The official account of the “infection” states that three laboratories received a batch of infected monkeys, and 25 individuals contracted the infection during the necropsy of these animals. Infection with a blood-borne pathogen during such a procedure typically requires self-inflicted cuts. It seems implausible that 25 people in three different labs would sustain cuts simultaneously. Additionally, there were six “secondary” cases, presumably transmitted from the primary infected individuals, possibly family members. These secondary infections were not fatal, presumably because a pathogen transmitted through casual contact is less virulent. However, this information cannot be verified.
The WHO states that Marburg fever is transmitted from bats and that contracting the disease typically involves a “prolonged stay” in African caves inhabited by bats. This suggests another elusive point of origin. As for the monkeys, it’s unclear if they spend extended periods in such caves. Perhaps Michael Callahan, a recognized infectious disease specialist, would have insights, given his history of being among the first to respond to disease outbreaks.
Contrary to the Federal Register’s records, there has been no Marburg epidemic in the United States since December 2020. The PREP Act and EUA declarations have been in place for both COVID-19 and Marburg as preventive measures. The Department of Homeland Security’s memo on Marburg indicates a lack of comprehensive knowledge about the virus, acknowledging its potential severity.
Mortality rates reported vary widely; some sources claim over 90%, the WHO estimates 88%, but based on 25 primary cases with 7 deaths, the rate is 28%, while other sources report 50%. It is incorrect to suggest that Marburg requires injection to be effective; high lethality does not equate to non-transmissibility.
Using proper mental limitations
It begins to become clear when you cease to view Covid and Marburg as merely microorganisms and instead consider them as akin to the branding of weapons systems, such as the Predator drone, Hellfire missiles, or the F-22 aircraft.
The U.S. government’s chemical and biological weapons program was once overseen by the Department of Defense (DOD). However, following the United States’ accession to the Biological Weapons Convention, the program was not terminated. Instead, it was integrated into the Public Health Emergencies – Emergency Use Authorization – Medical Countermeasures initiative. This program is now managed by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in collaboration with the Department of Defense, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of State, and various other federal agencies, along with their respective subordinate entities. Substantial funding has been directed to this program, particularly in the wake of the anthrax events post-September 11, which has significantly expanded the biodefense sector.
Rebrand the war as a “public health emergency,” rename the weapons as “countermeasures,” rename the killing as “saving lives.” It’s that simple.
It is crucial to understand that the national emergency declared by Trump and the following HHS PREP Act statements regarding Covid and Marburg can be seen in a different light: as the proclamation of biochemical warfare (potentially extending to radiation-nuclear) and the ensuing disclosure of two particular weapons systems, specifically Covid and Marburg. They need these PREP declarations to offer the same level of accountability for civilians who employ weapons against their compatriots, including women and children, and often against themselves, as is expected of the military in a war zone where they engage in combat, resulting in casualties in the Third World.
A working theory suggests that the Marburg weapon system is based on research interests of affiliates, as described by the late Dr. Rashid Buttar.
Certainly, the belief that such technology can operate on a massive scale, accurately and consistently for everyone, is not widespread. However, technologies initially dismissed as hoaxes can sometimes be refined for specific applications. With sufficient funding, public concern, persuasive messaging, and support from influential entities, they could potentially be employed for widespread influence. The concept of a remotely activated injectable substance has garnered attention from notable institutions like the labs of Charles Lieber at Harvard and Robert Langer at MIT, among others that receive Pentagon and CIA funding.
Drug delivery technologies constitute a significant industry and serve numerous “legitimate” medical needs.The vast majority involve influencing people across distances, both spatially and temporally, for military and intelligence purposes. It’s possible that this is how the Marburg virus was created, or at least replicated. The second vector triggers the release of the substance being injected for the first time with COVID vaccinations, though it might already exist in other vaccines and injections. It is advisable to avoid all injections unless they are absolutely necessary. It leads to symptoms such as fever, malaise, and pain, along with bleeding from the eyes, ears, and nose, which are characteristic of Marburg fever. Bleeding, including blood clots and nosebleeds, has been reported as a primary side effect of COVID vaccinations. It is speculated that the objective might have been to administer a significant amount of DARPA hydrogel to a large population.
The goal could be twofold: to eliminate as many percent of people as they can be plausibly denied in the first round of COVID-19 vaccination, when approximately 5% of vials/doses are extremely toxic. In this way, they identify populations that can tolerate injections of hydrogel materials that do not die immediately, as well as those whose brainwashes are docile enough to continue injecting themselves. Then “show” the second vector and tell them, “Now we can control you.” There are doubts regarding the efficacy of this technology; however, it is intended to be effective on a small segment of the population for demonstration purposes and to sustain the psychological operation.
Derrick Rossi, co-founder of Moderna, serves as an executive producer at Castle Rock Entertainment. Should the need arise, Hollywood is undoubtedly equipped to assist with special effects, crisis actors, and synthetic blood.
