Connect with us

Conspiracy Theories

New studies: ‘Conspiracy theorists’ sane; government dupes crazy, hostile

Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites.

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority.

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.”

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.”

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it.

Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called “conspiracists” or “conspiracy theorists.”

Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people don’t like being called “conspiracy theorists”: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! “The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”

In other words, people who use the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations.

DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved “state crimes against democracy.” An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the “Kennedy assassinations” in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime.

Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed “conspiracy theory” label impedes cognitive function. She points out, in an article published in American Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief.

In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong “confirmation bias” – that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the “conspiracy theory” label) to avoid conflicting information.

The extreme irrationality of those who attack “conspiracy theories” has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled “Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion,” they wrote:

“If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid… By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.”

But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the “conspiracy theory” smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous – and more rational – than anti-conspiracy ones.

No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks.

Source: presstv.com

Conspiracy Theories

The possibility of Planet X being a ship planet

On September 8-10, 2020, several new videos were posted online by different accounts, in which people captured, as it seemed to them, Nibiru:

https://twitter.com/haigracekem/status/1303351672656150528?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Unfortunately, the authors of such videos do not always indicate the exact time of recordings, which makes them difficult to be verified, however, will base them on the date of September 8 and see what the telescopes showed on that day. 

The first service we will turn to for verification will be George Mason University, which kindly introduces the public to photographs of the Lasco C2 telescope:

 As you can see, to the right of the Sun (from the point of view of an observer on Earth), a coronal mass ejection slightly illuminated a round object. Perhaps, of course, we have seen this, so let’s turn to another source – the CACTus software, which was created to track solar flares:

Something round actually dangles near the Sun

Unfortunately, all telescopes are controlled by officials, and the officials, as we know, are tricky – this is clearly seen from the videos that they post to the public. The frame rate is one frame per hour or so – that is, the frames are carefully selected and filtered to those that can be shown to the masses, and those that should not be shown in any case. 

Fortunately, Mr. Planet X News, a nybirologist with twenty years of experience, has some kind of contacts with light adepts, and from time to time they leaked deleted frames to him. For example – frames for the same on September 8, time 12:24 or so:

Thus, it seems that there is now some kind of round object around the Sun, which makes a full revolution in aproximately 7 days. Therefore, one week it is seen to the right of the Sun, one week – to the left of the Sun. Therefore, everything seems to be clear. Nevertheless, both our readers and we, as honest researchers, have some questions. 

The first question is, why can’t we see Nibiru? Why is it not seen by billions of people? Why is it only seen occasionally? The answer to this question is obvious:

This is already a secondary question and is not the subject of this material, so we turn to the second question – Kepler’s laws. 

According to these laws, the planet under consideration, revolving around the star, moves not in a circle, but along an ellipse, in which two points are distinguished: perihelion is the point of the orbit closest to the Sun, and aphelion is the most distant point of the orbit.

 Nibiru, in theory, as if at perihelion

If we consider celestial mechanics, it is completely incomprehensible: how can Nibiru be in a circular orbit if it should rotate in an ellipse? The planets do not change their orbits – this is the law of astronomy. If Nibiru changed its orbit to a circular one and is now wandering somewhere between the Sun and Mercury, then it will not be able to return to an elliptical orbit and leave the solar system. Meanwhile, according to the legends, the mystery planet must leave us for five hundred years. It’s a direct, insoluble paradox. 

This kind of paradox can be resolved very simply if we assume that Nibiru is not just a planet, but a planet that has been turned into a spaceship. Once in a while, the Anunnaki visit the solar system – they slow down, descend from an elongated orbit to a circular one, fill their batteries from the sun, harvest on a farm, and then fly away on their own business – until the batteries are exhausted and the refrigerators run out of food. Then the cycle repeats. 

In the light of these considerations, a third question arises: when will the Anunnaki bask in the sun enough and begin to harvest? 

Continue Reading

Conspiracy Theories

The twin-sun phenomenon is becoming a frequent occurence

One of the strangest and most inexplicable phenomena of recent times has become the phenomenon of “two suns” that people see today so often that special tags were even allocated for the topic on video hosting sites.

One of the newest videos on this topic was a video shot in Colorado around August 23, 2020:

Another video shot on August 20 and deleted from YouTube for some reason, only screenshots remained:

You can have guesses whether it was a glare on the window, photoshop, Nibiru or something else, so we turn to the source where you don’t need to guess – to the NASA satellites, which show the following:

This photo baffles even the most famous Nybirologists, because the picture captures three hefty round objects at once, dangling around the Sun.

If the spots were monochromatic, one could say that these are some kind of artifacts. But on the objects, the illuminated side and the shadow side are clearly visible, with the illuminated sides turned towards the Sun. But what is this ?!

The first thing you can think about is that the Nibiru system is now somewhere relatively close to the Earth, between us and the Sun. The planets there are large, one of the satellites is assumed to be generally the size of Jupiter, so this system may have been captured by a satellite at close range.

The full video with a set of new photos from the solar observatory is given below:

We will not prove that all this is Nibiru and nothing else, since we are not interested in proving our rightness, but in the truth. And this truth can be very different from the generally accepted ideas about space:

Amateur astronomers have been looking at the Sun for a long time, finding from time there a lot of different wonderful things, but no one has yet seen the “flying horseshoe” there.

The horseshoe looks a lot like a ship with a very strange design that the directors came up with for the Alien trilogy and the movie “Prometheus”. The only thing that confuses is the size of the ships: they are simply gigantic, there are no such spaceships even in the movies.

Therefore, there are only two explanations for what is happening: either there is no “solar system” and the Earth is some kind of an asteroid fragment covered with a glass dome, under which people of microscopic size live, or this horseshoe-like alien ship flew somewhere relatively nearby and just got caught into the frame that turned out to be against the background of the sun. If we follow that theory, its dimensions are quite acceptable.

Which of the explanations for what is happening is more correct – you decide.

Continue Reading

Conspiracy Theories

A battery that can last 28000 years

Newatlas.com reports on August 25 that the Californian company NDB announced the creation of a truly revolutionary battery, which can hardly even be called a battery: it can last 28,000 years. 

At the heart of each energy cell is the isotope of carbon C-14, aka Carbon-14, aka radiocarbon or radiocarbon, pressed into a diamond. Beta decay produces nitrogen, an electron, and an electron antineutrino from radiocarbon. The electrons are captured by a local capacitor built around the cell, after which the electricity is led out into a common circuit.

Carbon-14 is radioactive and its main source is graphite from nuclear reactors, which for decades was considered a hazardous nuclear waste that cannot be disposed of. However, there is little graphite inside the energy cell and its radiation is comparable to Carbon-14, which is full in the body of every living being.

Nevertheless, the diamond cell itself is sealed in another layer of artificial diamond made of ordinary carbon and its radioactivity is reduced to zero.

NDB batteries will be the same size as lithium batteries. That is, to power the microcircuit, the battery will be the size of a microcircuit, to power the phone – the size of a phone, to power the car – the size of its trunk.

The news, of course, is sensational, however, so far no one has seen these miraculous batteries in the store and there is a likelihood of a divorce of investors for the loot, since the faces of the inventors do not inspire confidence:

Scientific teams of much larger size have been unsuccessfully fighting over the topic of such devices for decades. It is believed that they received such batteries back in the Third Reich, but the allies did not give them a go, since they prevented them from making money on oil. Of course, no one from the general public saw these Nazi batteries themselves, but everyone saw a photo of one of the German shipyards taken from an airplane in 1944. There were six submarines there, much like what we today call nuclear submarines: the shape and size there were about the same.

There are also several testimonies of sailors who met these boats in the ocean and tried to chase them unsuccessfully. None of this worked, since at the end of the 1940s, their speed and depth of diving were impossible – the USA, USSR, Britain and France learned to make such boats only in the 1960s.

The Third Reich did not have nuclear propulsion systems, otherwise they would have already appeared in the allies in 1947, therefore it is assumed that there were high-capacity batteries, which made it possible to build such huge boats. The Germans themselves made them or someone helped them – the researchers do not know.

Rumors about the imminent appearance on the market of some new super-duper-batteries have been circulating for at least ten years, but, for some reason, the presentation has been postponed.

However, if this time they are nevertheless merged, the world will face a real energy revolution. Although not only energetic. There is also a fairy tale about aliens who steal people, make diamonds out of them, and these diamonds then serve as a source of energy for UFOs.

Since such a concept of the engine somehow did not properly fit into our heads, many considered these words as unrealistic. However, as we can see, diamonds are already being made of people, and now there is also a technology to turn these diamonds into batteries with a life of 28,000 years.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

DO NOT MISS

Trending