Connect with us

Conspiracy Theories

Why are they Lying?

Why are they Lying?

All ‘Solutions’ Are Futile: US & UK Science Academies: Cutting all CO2 emissions would not stop global warming: ‘Essentially irreversible on human timescales’

by Anthony Bright-Paul

‘The U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the UK’s Royal Society:
‘The current CO2-induced warming of Earth is therefore essentially irreversible on human timescales.’   (Climate Depot)


Why are they lying? Why are they lying in their back teeth?

While the Niagara Falls is frozen, while Chicago is suffering the coldest spell for 30 years, while the snow disrupts the whole of the United States with airlines cancelling flights and businesses disrupted everywhere, these two august bodies come out with a declaration that is so ridiculous that it defies common sense.

January 2014 Extreme Deadly Cold Wave Sweeping Across All Midwest & East Coast U.S & Canada 

Niagara Falls Freezes OverONTARIO, CANADA – JANUARY 9: A view of the Niagara Falls frozen over due to the extreme cold weather, Ontario, Canada, January 9, 2014. The Polar Vortex brought record cold temperatures to United States and Canada. (Photo by Seyit Aydogan/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images)

Firstly, is there any Global Warming at all? The facts are quite simple. There is nowhere, there is no one place, that one can take the temperature of the Earth. So they have to keep on repeating a lie, that Global Warming is continuing. Why do they repeat this absolutely unscientific assertion?

Secondly they assert that this non-existent and unproven warming is caused by CO2 emissions.  Ask yourselves a simple question. What is supposed to be warming? Next ask your friends, particularly if they have bought this idea, ask them what is supposed to be warming?

It is a very simple question. Are the landmasses in the Northern hemisphere getting hotter? Or the land masses in the Southern Hemisphere?  Are the oceans getting hotter? And when you have gone through land and seas, then you can come to the atmosphere. Is the Atmosphere getting hotter?              

Only a simpleton, only someone with no knowledge at all could possibly declare that the atmosphere was getting hotter. Every weather bulletin in every country declares that the temperatures in their given locations are always changing, minute by minute. And that is only at ground level. Any Air pilot can tell you the temperature at altitude is always less than at ground level. And that is to talk of just the Troposphere and to leave the Stratosphere, the Mesosphere and the Thermosphere as if they did not exist.

It is simply idiotic to talk of a Global temperature, since no such animal exists. And to take an average of air temperatures is also an exercise in fatuity.  How can one take an average of something that is so vast and so diverse? These averages are subject to every sort of chicanery and manipulation and not to be relied on at all.

In hindsight only can we look back on major changes when ice has covered large portions of the Northern Hemisphere, and in hindsight can we see the intervening warm periods. To any normal observation the world appears to be getting colder. To argue that despite appearances the world on average is hotter is simply chicanery, duplicity and downright dishonesty.

It takes but a little thought to compare the hot with the cold. Can anyone seriously maintain that they would rather live in the frozen wastelands of the Arctic regions rather than the lush tropical paradises that abound, say in the Caribbean, say around the Mediterranean?

So why does this huge lie continue to exist?
The answer is simple. Once there has been a political con of this magnitude there is no going back. Once people have been persuaded that Global Warming has been ‘CO2 induced’ with all the ramifications, with the huge cost and the false profits, those who have profited, those who have masterminded this huge confidence trick just cannot turn back. They would have to admit that they were wrong on a truly massive mind-boggling scale. That would mean all the scientists, all the politicians and all the ragtag and bobtail of the hysterical hangers-on would have to confess: We were all wrong.  

Can you wonder that they hate the Skeptics who would expose them?  The Warmists like to suggest that the Skeptics are in bed with Big Business, or with Big Oil or with Big Carbon, Big Coal. The truth is that the Warmists hate any form of Capitalism, yet love its benefits. They hate any form of enterprise where individuals risk their capital on an enterprise for which they may make a profit – but also, let it not be forgotten, where they may also make a loss. In recent years many people invested in the Channel Tunnel. Was this a good investment? Only now after several years is this enterprise becoming profitable.

Consider the difference with Green Technologies like Wind Farms. These are intrinsically unreliable. Nobody with any sense would invest in a technology, which promised to produce intermittent electricity at 5 times the price of coal, oil or gas produced electricity. So these Technologies are inherently unprofitable and are subsidised by governments out of the Privy Purse. This means that a few rich landowners are paid by your and my money not to produce meaningful electricity. Do you wonder that some unscrupulous people are benefiting from what seems to be a freebie, a free handout from the State, when in reality the treasury is simply re-distributing our money to a few vassals in the form of monster bribes? Compared to that, Big Business is as white as the driven snow.

How can Carbon Dioxide, a gas, induce warming? Please note that weasel word ‘induce’. The Warmists know very well that CO2 cannot generate heat. Even by their own theory they only claim that:

This light is mainly absorbed by land, sea etc and converted to heat (vibration of molecules). When the energy is re-radiated it is emitted as much lower frequency infrared (below or lower frequency than red). It is this infrared radiation that is absorbed by the “greenhouse gases” (including water vapour), which warm the atmosphere. This is an oversimplification. 

Here is an excellent simplification of the Warmist position, by my Warmist colleague Max Potter.  Sunlight is converted to heat and the greenhouse gases absorb this lower frequency infrared. So what, even by their own theory, is doing the warming? It is the infrared, that is, the heat coming from the earth that is absorbed by the molecules of Carbon Dioxide.

Sun heats Earth and Earth heats Atmosphere. What happens to warmed gases? They rise up by convection and cool. Apart from which the so-called Greenhouse gases comprise a mere 1% of the atmosphere, while 99% is Oxygen and Nitrogen, both of which gases have a higher heat capacity than Carbon Dioxide. Not a lot of people seem to take that into account.

So what in reality warms the Lower Atmosphere? When the BBC gives a weather forecast and looks ahead at temperatures, do they say that the Carbon Dioxide will be 12 degrees today and the Oxygen and Nitrogen will be only 10 degrees!!! Don’t be daft. The temperature that is given is the temperature of the air, of the atmosphere at a given moment, of all the gases together. But even the BBC will show a rise and a fall in temperatures from dawn till dusk and from dusk till dawn. Have you ever seen a temperature outside in the open remain absolutely constant?

The reality is that there is constant heat exchange between the surfaces of the land and oceans with the atmosphere by conduction all over the world. This heat exchange is immensely complicated, by winds, by clouds, by rain, and by the Jetstream coursing through the Stratosphere. Do you think these savants do not know this? Do you think that our Meteorologists are not aware of the reality?

The whole business of heat exchange by conduction is immensely complicated as different substances have different heat capacities.

But does CO2 do any warming at all? How can it? It is a gas. By the very words of my colleague Max Potter we can see that the miniscule amount of atmospheric CO2 (0.04% of the atmosphere) is warmed by this lower frequency infrared. So what does the warming? The infrared. And where does the infrared come from? The infrared derives from the Sun’s radiation. Carbon Dioxide does not and cannot generate heat and it can no more trap heat than can Nitrogen and Oxygen, which both have a greater heat capacity.

What we are concerned with here is the right use of language, with logic. Let us look at this warmist assertion again.

It is this infrared radiation, which is absorbed by the “greenhouse gases” (including water vapour), which warm the atmosphere.

One needs to read this carefully. The Greenhouse Gases are part of the atmosphere. They are warmed by the infrared and being gases they quickly lose their heat by convection. These gases do not do any warming – none whatsoever. Nor can they trap anything, least of all heat. It is completely impossible. And as to ‘warming the atmosphere’ this surely is the most unscientific statement ever. By what possible means could the molecules of a gas, which take their temperature from the surrounding molecules, by what possible means could they heat the other molecules of Nitrogen and Oxygen? By what possible means could they warm the atmosphere? By re-radiating downwards? If that were possible it would have been clearly demonstrated long before now. But there is no such demonstration.

The Warmists love the phrase ‘making the Lower Atmosphere warmer than it would otherwise be’. That’s a scientific statement, if ever there was one.

What do we have from the witch doctors? Answer: An assertion that the Globe is warming.  Where is the evidence? What precisely is warming? Nothing is clearly defined, is it? The very word ‘Global’ is suitably vague.

So now we have another assertion, namely, that this supposed warming is induced by Carbon Dioxide and, woe is me, cannot be stopped. Is this science? Or is this legerdemain?

There is only one source of heat for this Planet Earth and that is the Sun. Everybody in their hearts knows this for a fact. Everybody knows that there are seasons, which are governed by our journey round the Sun. Everybody knows than the weather changes from hour to hour and that the best meteorologists in the world cannot forecast more than a few hours ahead.   The idea that mankind is somehow controlling the weather, and by inference the climate; or the climate and by inference the weather, is not only ludicrous but is delusional.

So these Academies and academics keep repeating their mantras, keep repeating that the Globe is warming, keep repeating that that Carbon Dioxide is the culprit, keep repeating that mankind is changing the climate, all of which assertions have no scientific basis whatsoever. We are not dealing with scientists, but with magicians who have invoked a kind of mass suggestion, akin to hypnosis in order to lull the masses to sleep.

Millions of dollars and millions of pounds sterling have already been spent on an undefined and non-existent problem. Can you wonder that one lie has to be compounded with another? If they did not keep lying they would have to admit that they have been pouring away millions to no avail at all. Now they are trying to justify the waste they have created, a waste to no avail.

Anthony Bright-Paul
March 2014

Subject Related >>

PS  Quotes about “A Big Lie”

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”  – Joseph Goebbels, Hitler’s Minister of Propaganda

Several other famous indiviuals have quoted similar statements long before HItler and Goebbels.

“A lie told often enough becomes truth”  — Vladimir Lenin.

“There’s nothing so absurd that if you repeat it often enough, people will believe it.”  — William James (1842-1910) The father of modern Psychology


Conspiracy Theories

TR-3B’s are absolutely real but who ‘owns’ them?

In early October, on many UFO channels, two very unusual UFO videos were discussed. Their unusualness is that, in contrast to many similar clips, their reliability is beyond doubt and the “discs” can be seen very well there – you can even see some details. 

The first video was filmed from the International Space Station. For readers who, due to the remoteness from the city, have too expensive traffic, we present an enlarged program image of the “plate”

Well, this is the video itself:

A lot of incomprehensible video material comes from the ISS, but most often there are either just luminous objects in the frame, or some vague shadows, which skeptics later call pieces of foil, but here it is definitely not foil, and in general terms you can understand how these “saucer plates” look. 

The second very unusual video was filmed the day before over the state of New York:

Direct link to the original mufon.

This is not a computer graphics, nor a secret drone. This is a TR-3B, which, as we can see, exists and can be viewed in detail. In the center there is some kind of basic, apparently, an engine, three engines (nozzles?) in the corners and they obviously work on some other principle – their color is different.

What are the three small lights along one of the edges of the triangle is not clear. Either it is some kind of device for taxiing the apparatus, or signal lights. And this thing bears little resemblance to some kind of “extraterrestrial device”, which causes more and more concern among people. Why? 

If the Pentagon has had such aircrafts for a long time (triangles have been observed in the sky for at least 30 years), then why all this circus with F-35 and other airplanes? To keep people busy in their production and rip off money from buyers? Or are the squadrons with these strange vehicles not under the control of the Pentagon? But who do they obey then? 

Conspiracy theorists are now offering two main explanations for the situation – good and bad.

A good explanation suggests that Trump and his Space Forces are behind these secret ‘ashtrays’. That is, either these TR-3Bs report directly to him, or Trump was promoted to the White House by the people who are behind the development of these devices. And now, visually flying over some cities of the United States, some secret military from Area-51 made it clear to the Deep State who is in charge in America and in the world in general:

 The second possible explanation for the flashes of TR-3B is already very pessimistic and suggests that the military behind these technologies is precisely the same Deep State. In this case, the collapse of America is a foregone conclusion and no Trump can do anything there. 

In any outcome of the elections, first unrest will begin in America, then China, the UN and other “peacekeepers” will climb there to restore order, during which the Chinese MiG-21s will bring down F-35 packs, since an invisible UFO will fly in front of them and do all the work … And the whole world will be surprised by the “great Chinese power”. 

Then China will begin to establish its own order, spreading hegemony throughout the world. Someone will fall under it voluntarily, but someone will not agree with such a new order and a hefty war will begin that will cover the entire planet. The last battle will obviously be somewhere in the Syrian desert, where the Chinese, according to prophecies, will bring 200 million people. And at that moment, TR-3B will appear from the clouds and burn all the army – both from one side and the other.

Further landing ramps will fall, some cyborgs or genomutants will be dumped from the miracle-ships in formation and will report that so they say and so – from now on we will all live without wars, according to new rules, in a new global and friendly world. This will be followed by a general command to chip. 

We do not know which of the options is correct. We hope for the first, but the second is also not excluded. Everything will become more or less clear only after the US elections…   

Continue Reading

Conspiracy Theories

Chatham House – The Open Conspiracy Organization Emerged 100 Years Ago

HG Wells  in “The Open Conspiracy. Blue Prints for a World Revolution”(1928) wrote that in the twentieth century the world entered a dangerous phase of development, which could end in catastrophe and even destruction of mankind. The only way to prevent a catastrophe, Wells instructed, is the elimination of sovereign states and the creation of a One World Government, headed by a small group of people – representatives of the intellectual elite and big business.

The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution

The idea of ​​world domination has been nurtured for centuries by various secret societies (Templars, Freemasons, Illuminati). However, their plans and activities were hidden from the eyes of the authorities and the people. In the twentieth century, there was an argument to open these plans. And it was necessary to hurry, because scientific and technological progress was accelerating, remaining uncontrollable. The arms race continued and accelerated in exactly the same way.

At the 1919 Paris Peace Conference, these issues were discussed openly. It was decided to create the League of Nations, through which the British and Americans expected to begin building a new world order. True, there were disagreements between the ruling circles of the United States and Great Britain. London believed that the ideal basis for a united world was the British Empire, over which“the sun never sets.” In Washington, it was believed that America became the No. 1 power after the First World War and that it was she who should lead the movement towards a new world order.

Colonel House
Colonel House

However, both in the USA and Great Britain there were politicians who considered these imperial ambitions to be “prejudices of nationalism”, considering themselves a single elite of the highest Anglo-Saxon race. Such was Edward Mandel House  (1858-1938) – diplomat, adviser to President  Woodrow Wilson  (Colonel House). Lord Alfred Milner  (1854-1925), one of the key figures in the cabinet of David Lloyd George, was also a consistent supporter of Anglo-Saxon mondialism.

Lord Alfred Milner
Lord Alfred Milner

Colonel House was very upset when, while at a conference in Paris, he learned that Washington had rejected US participation in the League of Nations, the provisions of which were laid down in the Versailles Peace Treaty. He very much hoped that the League of Nations would become an instrument for the creation of a United State. After that, in the same place, in Paris, Colonel House met with British partners. They agreed that two organizations would be created in the United States and Great Britain, closely interacting and implementing the Anglo-Saxon project of building a new world order.

The first of these organizations was established a hundred years ago, in the summer of 1920. It was the  British Institute of International Affairs (BIIA) , renamed toThe Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA)  in 1926  and still exists under that name. The Institute is also known as Chatham House, which is the name of the building in which it is located (next to Westminster Palace in central London). In 1961, the  RIIA  changed location, but the Chatham House name remained.

The preparatory work for the establishment of the  RIIA  was carried out by  Lionel Curtis , Lord Milner’s secretary. The status of the institute is a non-governmental non-profit organization that exists at the expense of voluntary donations. The first donation of £ 2,000 was made by Thomas Lamont  of J.P. Morgan Bank. John D. Rockefeller  has contributed  £ 8,000 annually to the RIIA since 1932. Later, the  RIIA  began to regularly receive large regular donations from American charitable foundations (the Rockefeller, Carnegie, and others).

The first head of the institute was  Robert Cecil  (1864-1958) – British lawyer, parliamentary, public and statesman, active employee and ideologist of the League of Nations, winner of the 1937 Nobel Peace Prize (for services to the League of Nations). Lionel Curtis was promoted to RIIA Honorary Secretary. The leadership of the institute also included former Foreign Minister  Edward Gray , former Prime Minister  Arthur Balfour , Lord Lothian, renowned English economist  John Maynard KeynesAlfred Zimmerman  (Oxford professor, author of The League of Nations and the Rule of Law). Zimmermann had a capable student, Arnold Toynbee (1889-1975). On Zimmerman’s recommendation, Toynbee became the institute’s first paid employee. Toynbee was later appointed director of the institute. At Chatham House,  Toynbee played the leading role for three decades (1925-1955). He directed scientific research and was at the same time a high-ranking officer of the British  MI6  (intelligence) service. Much of the RIIA research was done on behalf of MI6 .

Arnold Toynbee
Arnold Toynbee

RIIA did not arise out of nowhere. It became a superstructure over the rather secret organization “Round Table”. According to historians, this society arose as a secret in 1891 in South Africa at the initiative of Cecil John Rhodes (1853-1902), a famous figure of British imperialism, who linked his life with the British colonial expansion in South Africa. Rhodes, a gold and diamond miner in South Africa, was associated with the Rothschilds. In 1910, the Rothschilds established the Round Table in London; the main public figure for the Round Table was Lord Alfred Milner. During the Lord’s lifetime, the Round Table was often called the Milner Group. Many historians believe that at the beginning of the 20th century the composition of the Round Table and the composition of the Committee of 300 (the world elite).

As Nicholas Hagger notes  in The Syndicate, the history of the creation of a secret world government and the methods of its influence on world politics and economy ”, the activities of the Round Table had two contours – external (open activity) and internal (secret activity). The task of the Round Table, writes the famous American historian  Carroll Quigley (1910-1977) in the book Tragedy and Hope, was “no less than the creation of a world system of financial control, concentrated in private hands and capable of influencing the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system will be completely feudally governed by the central banks of the world, acting in accordance with secret agreements concluded at frequent personal meetings and conferences. Quigley was very fond of the Round Table, being the official historian of this society.

The Round Table set out the task of creating a world government governed by international bankers. Many researchers of the Round Table activities believe that the program of this organization as a whole coincides with the program of the Illuminati Order in the 18th century. The successors of the Illuminati, members of the Round Table, viewed England as an Atlantic force, not a European one, and counted on the creation of a federation of English-speaking countries. Milner has established Roundtable Groups in South Africa, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India and CIF. They were all run from England. They included the most famous politicians of the British government, and they were all devoted to the idea of ​​world government. The Roundtable has always wanted to transform the British Empire into a federal system that would eventually include both the United Kingdom and the United States.

The RIIA  was a continuation of the Round Table. After the death of Lord Milner in 1925, references to the Round Table became rare, and more often people began to speak of the Royal Institution. In 1931, Toynbee gave a speech in Copenhagen, in which he declared:  

“We are currently working with all who can make all the nation-states of our world forget about the mysterious power called sovereignty. And we constantly deny what we really do .

Nicholas Hagger believes that Toynbee was more American than British, as most of the funding came from overseas, from the Rockefellers:  

“For 40 years, Toynbee was actively involved in the RIIA’s efforts to create a world government. In his writings, Toynbee argues that nation states are withering away and will be supplanted by the “Rockefeller” world government. Although Toynbee’s work is fascinating, it is unfortunately completely unreliable .

Toynbee was a prominent member of the Fabian Society, ideologically close to the Labor Party. Toynbee and his associates Herbert Wells,  Bertrand RussellBernard Shaw, brothers Julian and Aldous Huxley did not rule out that the international socialist movement would become one of the possible ways to create the One State. In particular, Toynbee and his associates were very impressed by the Bolsheviks’ commitment to internationalism, although the Fabians and employees of the Royal Institute did not share communist views.

Among those who surrounded Toynbee, many understood that the building of the One State was a task for the distant future. It is necessary to move towards the cherished goal gradually. The creation of a united Europe, in which individual states would dissolve their sovereignty, was considered as a closer goal. Toynbee managed to live up to this time, when the Treaty of Rome was signed in 1957 by six European states (1957), and later the European Economic Community (EEC) began to be created.

A year after the establishment of the RIIA, a mirror institution was created on the other side of the Atlantic Ocean, called the  Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) . The origins of the organization were Colonel House and  Paul Warburg  (1868-1932) – one of the initiators of the creation of the US Federal Reserve System. CFR members   included Woodrow Wilson, Colonel House, and a number of other influential politicians, bankers and businessmen. Particularly noteworthy are members of the Council such as  John Foster Dulles  (served as Secretary of State under President  Eisenhower ) and his brother  Alain Dulles (future first head of the CIA). A close informal relationship was established between John Dulles and Arnold Toynbee. John Dulles, as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Rockefeller Foundation, has helped ensure that the Royal Institution receives regular financial support from the Foundation.

All publications on the Royal Institution usually refer to the  Chatham House Rule . It assumes that participants in closed meetings have no right to disclose the authorship of those other opinions outside the small circle of RIIA members  . Opinions can be published, but as impersonal. The rule is intended to encourage maximum openness and frankness in internal meetings. The official mouthpiece of the institute is International Affairs  and World Review .

Since 2005, the Royal Institution has established a prize – the  Chatham House Prize . It is awarded annually to “the statesman or organization that Chatham House members believe have made the most important contribution to improving international relations in the past year .” 

Continue Reading

Conspiracy Theories

Meteorite as a false flag? Shadow government prepares kinetic orbital strike

According to watchers, citing top NASA officials, on September 24, 2020 at 11:18 UTC, an asteroid designated as 2020 SW will approach the Earth.

The asteroid is small, about 10 meters, but the distance will also be quite small – 0.07 LD / 0.00019 AU / 28 423 km / 17 661 miles:

Meanwhile Express, again with reference to the nice guys from NASA reports that two more asteroid rocks are flying towards us – RH6 2020 and RQ3 2020, which will pass by the Earth in the next day. Both asteroids are about 50 meters in diameter, the distance to them will be crazy (about 10 LD), so the probability of something falling to Earth is excluded. However, the options may be somewhat different.

As the famous American conspiracy theorist Michael Salla recalls in his video for September 16, the Earth may collide not with an asteroid, but with a real orbital bombardment. Cleverly, this is called “kinetic orbital impact“:

As you can see from this explanatory video, a satellite placed in orbit can launch heavy and large tungsten rods on the Earth, the impact of which will be comparable in force to a meteorite impact. That is, practically an atomic bomb, but without undesirable damaging factors in the form of radioactive contamination.

Michael is a person known without any exaggeration and he has been studying the topic of orbital bombing for many years, suggesting that sooner or later the Deep State will use these weapons to organize one or another false flag. In particular, Michael posted another big article about this at the end of August.

When Michael Salla was just starting to raise awareness on this topic, they laughed at him, because people did not believe that certain intruders would shoot such things at their country. But much has changed since then, and the same fires in California leave no doubt about the deliberate arson. Therefore, if someone could encroach on California from orbit / from an airplane, then why not strike, for example, on New York?

In light of this possibility, any reports about asteroids are already suggestive, especially if these asteroids are trumped at all angles. There are also conspiracy theorists, who could well have given information – tomorrow a large stone will fall on Earth, but just do not tell anyone, since we told you the information in secret. And when something falls from heaven, everyone will know, there will be no need to explain anything to anyone.

On the other hand, something really flies near the Sun: If we assume that it is Nibiru, which brought a cloud of asteroids with it and these asteroids begin to fall on their heads, then the authorities may try to hide even this. And in this situation, people such as Michael Salla, who are sometimes called by the term “useful fools” by the special services, will become especially useful. That is, a person, speaking from a pure heart and not in any cooperation with the FBI / CIA, brought to the people information about some kind of “orbital strike”, which could be blamed for everything and even then start a small retaliatory nuclear war.

In general, the options can be different and, as it were, mutually exclusive, nevertheless, with any of the options, something healthy falls on the city and the people living there will absolutely not care whether it flew in Nibiru, or is it an orbital strike, or even a nuclear war.

That is why the probability of a false flag with bombing from orbit must be borne in mind – especially when NASA publicly discovers something there or conducts exercises about meteorite fall. As Michael Salla reminds, according to the scenario of the last NASA / FEMA exercises, the meteorite arrived in 2020, on September 20

Continue Reading