Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Metaphysics & Psychology

Hotter Weather Actually Makes Us Want to Kill Each Other

Hotter Weather Actually Makes Us Want to Kill Each Other 1

Farmers in Brazil are more likely to invade each others’ land in years that are particularly wet or unusually dry. Americans honk their horns more at other cars when it’s hot outside. Countries in the tropics are more likely to have civil wars in years that are especially hot or dry.

They may seem random, but actually, these events are all connected. New research from Princeton University and UC Berkeley published today in Science reveals a link between big shifts in climate and precipitation and a rise in interpersonal violence, institutional breakdown, and especially inter-group violence, such as war. Not only does the paper shed light on past bouts of global conflict, it also offers a warning about the future. The world is expected to warm by at least 2 degrees Celsius over the next few decades, unless governments do something drastic, and the researchers say that increased bloodshed could be a serious side-effect of that trend.

For this study, the researchers performed a meta-analysis of 60 studies, some of which contained data going back to 10,000 B.C. They found that as temperature increases one standard deviation from the mean — roughly equivalent to warming a U.S. county by 5 degrees Fahrenheit in a given month — the likelihood of interpersonal violence rises by 4 percent and that of intergroup conflict rises by 14 percent.

Screen Shot 2013-08-01 at 1.23.33 PM.png

The results touch on nearly every world region and hold true for both periods of extreme warming and cooling. Even the collapse of the Mayan civilization and major dynastic transitions in ancient China were preceded by drought and extreme weather. During the Little Ice Age, which started at around 1550, European countries were much more likely to go to war with each other.

Screen Shot 2013-08-01 at 1.22.00 PM.png

Solomon Hsiang, a public policy professor at Princeton and one of the study’s lead authors, told me that while his team did discover that conflict and climate change are related, they still don’t know why it is that temperature change makes us so belligerent. And, more importantly, they aren’t saying climate change is the only or even primary cause of violence.

“We’re in the position medical researchers were in in the 1930s,” he told me. “Smoking was the clear proximate cause of lung cancer, but it wasn’t until decades later that we understood how that was linked.”

They do offer a few theories, though. Climate change causes migration, and as big populations move, they might confront existing residents in a battle for resources and land. It can also alter physical environments in a way that predisposes people to confrontation, or — particularly in earlier eras — might have caused people to wrongly attribute environmental conditions to the actions of their enemies. Other studies have shown that hot temperatures make us more hostile psychologically.

Changes in the environment can also cause labor productivity to decline, which is what happened with our earlier example of civil war in the tropics: There’s less farm work during a drought, so there are more unemployed people. So if you’re looking to build an army and overthrow a government, it’s easier to do it when there are a lot of idle, would-be farm workers around, complete with pitchforks.

Some unrelated studies have shown that armed conflict has globally declined over the past 50 years or so, even though the world has been warming the entire time. Hsiang pointed out that it’s important to remember that he’s looking at what would have happened had there been no climate change during those decades — and the answer, he says, is that rates of conflict would have fallen even faster.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

“By focusing only on one country at a time, all we are doing is comparing a country to itself as the population is responding to changes in its environment,” he said.

So what does this say about the present day? This is one of the few studies that points to climate change’s likely impact on human society, as opposed to things like melting ice caps and rising sea levels, but it also helps us think about how much we want to spend to mitigate global warming. If we add “less peace” to all of global warming’s already horrific environmental impacts, it might change our calculus significantly.



You May Also Like

Apocalypse & Armageddon

Many of us think that the apocalypse is the end of the world, the death of the world in general. Many die, but not all. Apocalypse...


by Lexie The Spirit Science I was so happy to finally see a study done on the psychology of conspiracy beliefs. It goes through the...


Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear...

Science & Technology

by Heidi Stevenson Ultrasound has become routine during pregnancy over the last 3 decades. It is assumed to be safe, though safety was never...

Metaphysics & Psychology

by Christina Sarich A recent brain imaging study conducted by Jordan Grafman of the National Institute of Health has revealed that the pleasure centers in our...

Ghosts & Hauntings

A recent study conducted in the UK has reported a steadily increasing trend in paranormal belief. The results suggested that up to 52% of...

Science & Technology

Rich people’s bodies are filled with mercury, poor people’s with lead and plastics, Gizmodo reports: New research from the University of Exeter looks at...


Luis Miranda The Real Agenda Global geo-engineering programs are literally ripping the atmosphere/climate, and Earths life support systems apart. The lethally toxic fallout from...