Connect with us

Conspiracy Theories

Henry Kissinger on the Assembly of a New World Order

By Henry Kissinger

The concept that has underpinned the modern geopolitical era is in crisis

Libya is in civil war, fundamentalist armies are building a self-declared caliphate across Syria and Iraq and Afghanistan’s young democracy is on the verge of paralysis. To these troubles are added a resurgence of tensions with Russia and a relationship with China divided between pledges of cooperation and public recrimination. The concept of order that has underpinned the modern era is in crisis.

The search for world order has long been defined almost exclusively by the concepts of Western societies. In the decades following World War II, the U.S.—strengthened in its economy and national confidence—began to take up the torch of international leadership and added a new dimension. A nation founded explicitly on an idea of free and representative governance, the U.S. identified its own rise with the spread of liberty and democracy and credited these forces with an ability to achieve just and lasting peace. The traditional European approach to order had viewed peoples and states as inherently competitive; to constrain the effects of their clashing ambitions, it relied on a balance of power and a concert of enlightened statesmen. The prevalent American view considered people inherently reasonable and inclined toward peaceful compromise and common sense; the spread of democracy was therefore the overarching goal for international order. Free markets would uplift individuals, enrich societies and substitute economic interdependence for traditional international rivalries.

In the Middle East, religious militias violate borders at will. Getty Images

This effort to establish world order has in many ways come to fruition. A plethora of independent sovereign states govern most of the world’s territory. The spread of democracy and participatory governance has become a shared aspiration if not a universal reality; global communications and financial networks operate in real time.

The years from perhaps 1948 to the turn of the century marked a brief moment in human history when one could speak of an incipient global world order composed of an amalgam of American idealism and traditional European concepts of statehood and balance of power. But vast regions of the world have never shared and only acquiesced in the Western concept of order. These reservations are now becoming explicit, for example, in the Ukraine crisis and the South China Sea. The order established and proclaimed by the West stands at a turning point.

First, the nature of the state itself—the basic formal unit of international life—has been subjected to a multitude of pressures. Europe has set out to transcend the state and craft a foreign policy based primarily on the principles of soft power. But it is doubtful that claims to legitimacy separated from a concept of strategy can sustain a world order. And Europe has not yet given itself attributes of statehood, tempting a vacuum of authority internally and an imbalance of power along its borders. At the same time, parts of the Middle East have dissolved into sectarian and ethnic components in conflict with each other; religious militias and the powers backing them violate borders and sovereignty at will, producing the phenomenon of failed states not controlling their own territory.

The challenge in Asia is the opposite of Europe’s: Balance-of-power principles prevail unrelated to an agreed concept of legitimacy, driving some disagreements to the edge of confrontation.

The clash between the international economy and the political institutions that ostensibly govern it also weakens the sense of common purpose necessary for world order. The economic system has become global, while the political structure of the world remains based on the nation-state. Economic globalization, in its essence, ignores national frontiers. Foreign policy affirms them, even as it seeks to reconcile conflicting national aims or ideals of world order.

This dynamic has produced decades of sustained economic growth punctuated by periodic financial crises of seemingly escalating intensity: in Latin America in the 1980s; in Asia in 1997; in Russia in 1998; in the U.S. in 2001 and again starting in 2007; in Europe after 2010. The winners have few reservations about the system. But the losers—such as those stuck in structural misdesigns, as has been the case with the European Union’s southern tier—seek their remedies by solutions that negate, or at least obstruct, the functioning of the global economic system.

The international order thus faces a paradox: Its prosperity is dependent on the success of globalization, but the process produces a political reaction that often works counter to its aspirations.

A third failing of the current world order, such as it exists, is the absence of an effective mechanism for the great powers to consult and possibly cooperate on the most consequential issues. This may seem an odd criticism in light of the many multilateral forums that exist—more by far than at any other time in history. Yet the nature and frequency of these meetings work against the elaboration of long-range strategy. This process permits little beyond, at best, a discussion of pending tactical issues and, at worst, a new form of summitry as “social media” event. A contemporary structure of international rules and norms, if it is to prove relevant, cannot merely be affirmed by joint declarations; it must be fostered as a matter of common conviction.

The penalty for failing will be not so much a major war between states (though in some regions this remains possible) as an evolution into spheres of influence identified with particular domestic structures and forms of governance. At its edges, each sphere would be tempted to test its strength against other entities deemed illegitimate. A struggle between regions could be even more debilitating than the struggle between nations has been.

The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another. These goals are not necessarily self-reconciling: The triumph of a radical movement might bring order to one region while setting the stage for turmoil in and with all others. The domination of a region by one country militarily, even if it brings the appearance of order, could produce a crisis for the rest of the world.

A world order of states affirming individual dignity and participatory governance, and cooperating internationally in accordance with agreed-upon rules, can be our hope and should be our inspiration. But progress toward it will need to be sustained through a series of intermediary stages.

To play a responsible role in the evolution of a 21st-century world order, the U.S. must be prepared to answer a number of questions for itself: What do we seek to prevent, no matter how it happens, and if necessary alone? What do we seek to achieve, even if not supported by any multilateral effort? What do we seek to achieve, or prevent, only if supported by an alliance? What should we not engage in, even if urged on by a multilateral group or an alliance? What is the nature of the values that we seek to advance? And how much does the application of these values depend on circumstance?

For the U.S., this will require thinking on two seemingly contradictory levels. The celebration of universal principles needs to be paired with recognition of the reality of other regions’ histories, cultures and views of their security. Even as the lessons of challenging decades are examined, the affirmation of America’s exceptional nature must be sustained. History offers no respite to countries that set aside their sense of identity in favor of a seemingly less arduous course. But nor does it assure success for the most elevated convictions in the absence of a comprehensive geopolitical strategy.

Comments

Conspiracy Theories

The possibility of Planet X being a ship planet

On September 8-10, 2020, several new videos were posted online by different accounts, in which people captured, as it seemed to them, Nibiru:

https://twitter.com/haigracekem/status/1303351672656150528?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Unfortunately, the authors of such videos do not always indicate the exact time of recordings, which makes them difficult to be verified, however, will base them on the date of September 8 and see what the telescopes showed on that day. 

The first service we will turn to for verification will be George Mason University, which kindly introduces the public to photographs of the Lasco C2 telescope:

 As you can see, to the right of the Sun (from the point of view of an observer on Earth), a coronal mass ejection slightly illuminated a round object. Perhaps, of course, we have seen this, so let’s turn to another source – the CACTus software, which was created to track solar flares:

Something round actually dangles near the Sun

Unfortunately, all telescopes are controlled by officials, and the officials, as we know, are tricky – this is clearly seen from the videos that they post to the public. The frame rate is one frame per hour or so – that is, the frames are carefully selected and filtered to those that can be shown to the masses, and those that should not be shown in any case. 

Fortunately, Mr. Planet X News, a nybirologist with twenty years of experience, has some kind of contacts with light adepts, and from time to time they leaked deleted frames to him. For example – frames for the same on September 8, time 12:24 or so:

Thus, it seems that there is now some kind of round object around the Sun, which makes a full revolution in aproximately 7 days. Therefore, one week it is seen to the right of the Sun, one week – to the left of the Sun. Therefore, everything seems to be clear. Nevertheless, both our readers and we, as honest researchers, have some questions. 

The first question is, why can’t we see Nibiru? Why is it not seen by billions of people? Why is it only seen occasionally? The answer to this question is obvious:

This is already a secondary question and is not the subject of this material, so we turn to the second question – Kepler’s laws. 

According to these laws, the planet under consideration, revolving around the star, moves not in a circle, but along an ellipse, in which two points are distinguished: perihelion is the point of the orbit closest to the Sun, and aphelion is the most distant point of the orbit.

 Nibiru, in theory, as if at perihelion

If we consider celestial mechanics, it is completely incomprehensible: how can Nibiru be in a circular orbit if it should rotate in an ellipse? The planets do not change their orbits – this is the law of astronomy. If Nibiru changed its orbit to a circular one and is now wandering somewhere between the Sun and Mercury, then it will not be able to return to an elliptical orbit and leave the solar system. Meanwhile, according to the legends, the mystery planet must leave us for five hundred years. It’s a direct, insoluble paradox. 

This kind of paradox can be resolved very simply if we assume that Nibiru is not just a planet, but a planet that has been turned into a spaceship. Once in a while, the Anunnaki visit the solar system – they slow down, descend from an elongated orbit to a circular one, fill their batteries from the sun, harvest on a farm, and then fly away on their own business – until the batteries are exhausted and the refrigerators run out of food. Then the cycle repeats. 

In the light of these considerations, a third question arises: when will the Anunnaki bask in the sun enough and begin to harvest? 

Continue Reading

Conspiracy Theories

The twin-sun phenomenon is becoming a frequent occurence

One of the strangest and most inexplicable phenomena of recent times has become the phenomenon of “two suns” that people see today so often that special tags were even allocated for the topic on video hosting sites.

One of the newest videos on this topic was a video shot in Colorado around August 23, 2020:

Another video shot on August 20 and deleted from YouTube for some reason, only screenshots remained:

You can have guesses whether it was a glare on the window, photoshop, Nibiru or something else, so we turn to the source where you don’t need to guess – to the NASA satellites, which show the following:

This photo baffles even the most famous Nybirologists, because the picture captures three hefty round objects at once, dangling around the Sun.

If the spots were monochromatic, one could say that these are some kind of artifacts. But on the objects, the illuminated side and the shadow side are clearly visible, with the illuminated sides turned towards the Sun. But what is this ?!

The first thing you can think about is that the Nibiru system is now somewhere relatively close to the Earth, between us and the Sun. The planets there are large, one of the satellites is assumed to be generally the size of Jupiter, so this system may have been captured by a satellite at close range.

The full video with a set of new photos from the solar observatory is given below:

We will not prove that all this is Nibiru and nothing else, since we are not interested in proving our rightness, but in the truth. And this truth can be very different from the generally accepted ideas about space:

Amateur astronomers have been looking at the Sun for a long time, finding from time there a lot of different wonderful things, but no one has yet seen the “flying horseshoe” there.

The horseshoe looks a lot like a ship with a very strange design that the directors came up with for the Alien trilogy and the movie “Prometheus”. The only thing that confuses is the size of the ships: they are simply gigantic, there are no such spaceships even in the movies.

Therefore, there are only two explanations for what is happening: either there is no “solar system” and the Earth is some kind of an asteroid fragment covered with a glass dome, under which people of microscopic size live, or this horseshoe-like alien ship flew somewhere relatively nearby and just got caught into the frame that turned out to be against the background of the sun. If we follow that theory, its dimensions are quite acceptable.

Which of the explanations for what is happening is more correct – you decide.

Continue Reading

Conspiracy Theories

A battery that can last 28000 years

Newatlas.com reports on August 25 that the Californian company NDB announced the creation of a truly revolutionary battery, which can hardly even be called a battery: it can last 28,000 years. 

At the heart of each energy cell is the isotope of carbon C-14, aka Carbon-14, aka radiocarbon or radiocarbon, pressed into a diamond. Beta decay produces nitrogen, an electron, and an electron antineutrino from radiocarbon. The electrons are captured by a local capacitor built around the cell, after which the electricity is led out into a common circuit.

Carbon-14 is radioactive and its main source is graphite from nuclear reactors, which for decades was considered a hazardous nuclear waste that cannot be disposed of. However, there is little graphite inside the energy cell and its radiation is comparable to Carbon-14, which is full in the body of every living being.

Nevertheless, the diamond cell itself is sealed in another layer of artificial diamond made of ordinary carbon and its radioactivity is reduced to zero.

NDB batteries will be the same size as lithium batteries. That is, to power the microcircuit, the battery will be the size of a microcircuit, to power the phone – the size of a phone, to power the car – the size of its trunk.

The news, of course, is sensational, however, so far no one has seen these miraculous batteries in the store and there is a likelihood of a divorce of investors for the loot, since the faces of the inventors do not inspire confidence:

Scientific teams of much larger size have been unsuccessfully fighting over the topic of such devices for decades. It is believed that they received such batteries back in the Third Reich, but the allies did not give them a go, since they prevented them from making money on oil. Of course, no one from the general public saw these Nazi batteries themselves, but everyone saw a photo of one of the German shipyards taken from an airplane in 1944. There were six submarines there, much like what we today call nuclear submarines: the shape and size there were about the same.

There are also several testimonies of sailors who met these boats in the ocean and tried to chase them unsuccessfully. None of this worked, since at the end of the 1940s, their speed and depth of diving were impossible – the USA, USSR, Britain and France learned to make such boats only in the 1960s.

The Third Reich did not have nuclear propulsion systems, otherwise they would have already appeared in the allies in 1947, therefore it is assumed that there were high-capacity batteries, which made it possible to build such huge boats. The Germans themselves made them or someone helped them – the researchers do not know.

Rumors about the imminent appearance on the market of some new super-duper-batteries have been circulating for at least ten years, but, for some reason, the presentation has been postponed.

However, if this time they are nevertheless merged, the world will face a real energy revolution. Although not only energetic. There is also a fairy tale about aliens who steal people, make diamonds out of them, and these diamonds then serve as a source of energy for UFOs.

Since such a concept of the engine somehow did not properly fit into our heads, many considered these words as unrealistic. However, as we can see, diamonds are already being made of people, and now there is also a technology to turn these diamonds into batteries with a life of 28,000 years.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

DO NOT MISS

Trending