The subject of global catastrophes in history remains a somewhat “taboo” topic within mainstream science. However, a number of scientists acknowledge that such catastrophes have occurred on Earth in the distant past. Additionally, some independent researchers support this hypothesis.
Legends and myths from various cultures across the globe recount at least one immense catastrophe in Earth’s history. Despite their differences, shaped by geographical locations and cultural traditions, these stories share common elements that allow us to piece together the scenario of a once monumental cataclysm.
The precursor was the emergence of fiery entities that dimmed the Moon and Sun’s light. These entities crashed into the ocean and Earth amidst deafening noise. Their descent was marked by blinding flashes, “mountain fire,” and “flames reaching to heaven,” while thunderous roars and tremors reverberated worldwide.
After a period (approximately a month), a “great darkness” ensued. Concurrently, or nearly so (accounts vary), vast quantities of water deluged from the heavens, leading to a catastrophic sea level rise. The calamity culminated in severe frosts, causing the remaining survivors to perish from cold and starvation.
In 1978-1979 and 1983, American scientists C. Sagan and P. Crutzen, along with Soviet academician N.N. Moiseev, independently conducted computer simulations to calculate the potential aftermath of a medium-scale nuclear war. They concluded that such a conflict would not merely cause localized cooling and darkness beneath individual clouds but would lead to a global “nuclear night” or “nuclear winter” lasting approximately a year.
Their calculations indicated that Earth would be shrouded in darkness due to hundreds of millions of tons of soil, smoke from continental fires, and ash and soot from burning cities and forests blocking sunlight. This would result in a drastic cooling and a complete overhaul of atmospheric circulation, leading to massive floods on a continental scale within about six months.
The scientists’ description of the aftermath of a nuclear conflict strikingly echoes the scenarios of great catastrophes preserved in oral traditions. It is important to note that these predictions were based on data related to a medium-scale nuclear war of 5000 megatons. Concurrently, there are theories suggesting that the last such catastrophe occurred roughly 12 thousand years ago, caused by the impact of cosmic bodies, rather than an ancient nuclear war.
The descriptions of “harbingers” resembling “fiery bodies eclipsing the Moon and Sun” are akin to asteroid impacts or comet fragment collisions. It’s conceivable that such a catastrophe occurred around 12,000 years ago. However, we can disagree with the assertion that similar catastrophic events, albeit on a smaller scale like those described by N. Moiseev, C. Sagan, and P. Crutzen, did not happen in subsequent epochs. Moreover, there are suspicions that these disasters were “man-made,” likely resulting from the deployment of “cometary weapons” against humanity.
It is not by chance that following that ancient disaster, the Anunnaki, depicted in the Sumerian epics, and certain elohim from Jewish scriptures made their appearance on Earth. Incidentally, the biblical scholar M. Biyino, who spent several decades translating ancient Jewish texts for the Vatican and discovered accounts of these Elohim and their actions, posits that the Sumerian Anunnaki and the Jewish Elohim are identical entities, a theory he elaborates on in one of his publications.
Regarding the traces of “nuclear wars of the past,” it is not entirely implausible. There were indeed members of a covert scientific expedition, under the Soviet military’s auspices in Siberia, who purportedly discovered evidence of an ancient “nuclear war.” Furthermore, independent researchers have detailed an event recorded in the royal archives about a “fiery bolide” that fell on Tula in 1830, with aftermath resembling that of a nuclear strike.
Moreover, recent discoveries of unusual burials in Tula’s center during construction led independent researchers to analyze soil samples from the site, revealing signs of nuclear contamination. The recorded illnesses following the bolide’s fall bear a striking resemblance to symptoms of “radiation sickness.”
One should not jump to conclusions. Research conducted by a few scientists at the site of the Vitim explosion early in our century revealed that it was caused by a comet fragment’s fall. More importantly, researchers discovered traces of radioactivity at the explosion site, including weakly radioactive isotopes and other substances previously thought to be exclusive to artificial nuclear reactors.
This finding aligns well with the occurrence of “radiation sickness” among residents following the Tula bolide fall, where soil radioactivity was detected. Therefore, it is likely that a comet fragment’s fall was the cause. However, we harbor a strong suspicion that this disaster may have also been “man-made.”
Furthermore, it was during the mid-19th century that Biela’s Comet vanished, as noted by scientists. When last seen in 1846, it had already split into two significant pieces. Independent researchers have linked the mid-19th century catastrophe, which buried the lower levels of buildings globally, to the descent of this comet’s disintegrated fragments.
This disaster, like the comet’s disintegration, was not immediate. The fragments, drawn by Earth’s gravity, descended in a sequence. It is speculated that these fragments may have also ignited the mysterious fires that consumed stone cities worldwide in the latter half of the 19th century.
Incidentally, during the period of another catastrophe, which many indirect pieces of evidence suggest occurred between 1492 and 1502, there were not only accounts of numerous catastrophic events but also records of comet sightings and the descent of various “bolides.”
The exact nature of comets and the presence of weakly radioactive isotopes or other substances akin to those found in artificial nuclear reactors within them is not fully understood. However, scientists have observed that certain comets exhibit behaviors resembling controlled objects, capable of sudden changes in their movement trajectories. The hypothesis that an external force could be utilizing nuclear propulsion systems to direct these comets is intriguing.
Such a concept leads to the speculation about “cometary weapons” being used against humanity, potentially responsible for catastrophic events in history. These include the “Year Without a Summer” in the early 19th century, the “Little Ice Age” in Europe, and the “local Tatar flood” referenced in Athanasius Kircher’s works.
Certain individuals, often perceived as hired talkers, are zealous in persuading us that “past disasters did not occur,” which only fuels the suspicion of their artificial nature. Moreover, they seem to be linked to a force antagonistic to humanity, one that manipulates official science and history through clandestine ‘priestly structures’ that serve its interests. These structures, with their dogmatism and insistence on blind faith in their ‘official’ doctrines, are indistinguishable from the clergy of various religions.
While these are merely indirect indications of such a theory, the very presence of a ‘taboo’ surrounding this subject is telling. Consequently, some independent researchers and scholars prefer to sidestep discussions of historical catastrophes to evade the influence of these ‘priestly structures.’ However, to uncover the truth about our history, we must rely on our own intellect rather than the blind faith that is often presented as a substitute for authentic knowledge.
