Connect with us

Science & Technology

Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere

Science is always creativity. This is a search for new solutions and a game of imagination. Without all this, dry logic is useless. However, sometimes fantasy is capable of leading even the most brilliant, the most rigorous mind into unknown, cosmic distances.

Freeman Dyson is the famous scientist who came up with a truly fantastic scientific concept. This concept is known more than the creator, although it bears his name. This is one of the largest designs ever proposed by man. This is Dyson’s sphere.

Golden Boy

Freeman Dyson at the age of ten

Freeman John Dyson was born on December 15, 1923 in the small English town of Crowthorne (Berkshire). He was the second child of the famous composer George Dyson, who was knighted in 1941, and social worker Mildred.

The respectable family lived well, not needing money. Young Freeman showed a talent for mathematics and computing at an early age, and at the age of eight he was sent to boarding school in Twyford. There Freeman spent most of his time, appearing at home only on vacation. In fact, the boy was left to himself, but in those days this was the norm.

Unlike many outstanding scientists, Dyson did not experience any difficulties with his studies – the love of reading instilled in his mother affected. But the boy did not really get along with his peers. According to Dyson, the school was dominated by athletes who loved to rub everyone’s face with sandpaper. Therefore, he preferred to spend time alone, sitting somewhere in a tree and reading novels by Jules Verne and Frank Baum. But over time, he nevertheless made friends – the same children who were fond of fantastic stories and dreamed of bringing them to life. At the same time, Dyson decided to connect life with science, which since then has always been associated with him with freedom and friendship.

Composer Sir George Dyson. According to Freeman, his father’s works still make more money than all the writings of the scientist.

At the age of twelve, Dyson was lucky: his father was invited to teach music at the prestigious Winchester College, where he took his son. Paternal position, however, did not bring concessions to Freeman – he had to pass a difficult exam, which he passed with brilliance.

At Winchester, Dyson continued to study mathematics. He spent many hours in the extensive library, reading in the original French and German mathematical works, as well as the texts of Professor Vinogradov on the theory of numbers.

Fifteen-year-old Dyson met World War II with almost enthusiasm. The reason for this was youthful maximalism. “Hearing the sounds of explosions, I felt: this is the collapse of the British Empire of evil,” he said. In 1943, Dyson, barely out of college, went to work in the Royal Air Force. His job was specific – he figured out the most efficient and safest position of the pilots in the cockpits. True, all his works were in vain: the military almost did not use the results of his research, out of habit relying on outdated experience.

After the end of the war, Freeman worked at home for another two years. However, he doubted that he would be able to realize himself in depressed post-war England. And in 1947 Dyson moved to the USA – the country of Oppenheimer, Schrodinger and Einstein. In addition to the desire to participate in something truly progressive and large-scale, he, according to his sister, had another motive – Dyson longed to gain independence, to get out of the shadow of his famous father. Such adventures rarely end with something good … But exceptions do happen.

Brilliant mind

Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere
Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere
Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere
Some well known published Dyson’s books

Dyson loved listening to the BBC’s coverage of life in the United States. And, surprising as it may seem, America really turned out to be as described: a country of extraordinary rise, including scientific.

Upon arrival, Freeman took a Ph.D. job at Cornell University. There he came under the patronage of Hans Bethe, one of the most famous physicists of the time. Bethe quickly realized that he had a non-trivial mind as his student. Soon Hans recommended that Freeman go to the annual summer school for physicists in Ann Arbor – a five-week celebration of science, where young scientists could listen to lectures by legendary physicists and even argue with them. There, Dyson met Richard Feynman, one of the creators of the American atomic bomb.

Cover and snippet of an unpublished fantasy story Dyson wrote as a child
Cover and snippet of an unpublished fantasy story Dyson wrote as a child

Feynman, who was only five years older than Dyson, was already a celebrity in the world of quantum electrodynamics. In 1948, he proposed the method of the so-called Feynman diagrams, which described the interaction of fermions (matter quanta) and bosons (field quanta) in space-time coordinates. The diagrams allowed the creation of a modern model of quantum physics. But one of the patriarchs of the then physics, Robert Oppenheimer, rejected the Feynman diagrams. But Dyson was confident in their correctness and in 1949 published a work in which he was able to mathematically substantiate Feynman’s calculations, which for the first time earned serious recognition.

In 1951, Dyson became professor of physics at Cornell. At the same time, the young scientist had not even received his doctorate at that time – an exceptional case. However, he taught there for only two years. In 1953, Robert Oppenheimer offered him a life appointment at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton – the place where Albert Einstein spent the last years of his life. Oppenheimer promised the young scientist complete freedom: he could pursue any field that interested him. 

Dyson accepted the offer – and taught there until 1994, and after that he remained an honorary professor. During this time, he managed to work on the theory of resonant paramagnetic absorption of radiation by metals and on the theories of magnetism and the energy distribution of nuclei. He has published numerous works on cosmology, philosophy and futurology, received many prizes – the Nobel Prize, however, still bypassed the great scientist. And, of course, he managed to get a family – he lives with his second wife Imme to this day, he has 6 children and already 16 grandchildren.


In recent years, Dyson has been actively involved in the popularization of science. Several years ago, despite his considerable age, he traveled half the world with a series of lectures in which he expounded his thoughts on some of the problems facing humanity. He himself proudly calls his theses “heresies”, and himself – a heretic from science.

Friends note that Dyson has a rather modest, even shy character.

The first heresy is  about long-suffering global warming. Dyson is not the first to argue that the scale of the problem is vastly overblown, as is the role of humanity in the “impending disaster.” However, he makes a reservation: of course, the warming will not pass without a trace for humanity. But it is much more important to solve, for example, the problems of overpopulation and poverty. And warming comes and goes – and the role of man in it is insignificant.

The second heresy  is climate cycles. Dyson draws attention to the Sahara, which contains numerous artifacts from the past – and of sufficient quality. The Heretic recalls that 6,000 years ago the Sahara was humid – and in general the climate was completely different. In fact, the heresy lies in the fact that Dyson believes that the old, warmer and more humid climate is better than the current one.

To make the world hotter, Dyson calls for an increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere – something that conservationists oppose. This would at least increase the size of potential agricultural land at the expense of the Sahara or Siberian tundra, which was a flourishing paradise.

The third heresy  is the rise of bioengineering. Dyson argues that people are full of stereotypes about genetic engineering, similar to long-standing stereotypes about computers – they say, it’s all expensive, cumbersome, incomprehensible and only needed by a handful of scientists. But this will not always be the case, and people should be ready for this. The industry is moving forward by leaps and bounds. Freeman even predicts the creation of bio games – they will be similar to modern video games, only with real seeds. While playing, the child will select and see the growth of the plant in real time. Ultimately, genetic engineering can lead to a change in a person as such … but this is the next heresy.

The fourth heresy  is about the essence of evolution and human biology. Dyson argues that humanity will soon return to the original evolutionary mechanisms of the “pre-Darwinian era.” Then there were no separate species and a kind of communism reigned at the cellular level – everyone exchanged data and did not differ from each other. But suddenly a certain cell stepped to a new level – and refused to share with others, forming the first species. So, according to the scientist, soon everything will change – humanity and all living things will again become one whole. And genetics and bioinformatics will help us with this.

Dyson draws an analogy with the computer industry. Like, once the industry was completely open until one company closed its sources. However, the very essence of software, according to the scientist, assumes open source. And something similar must happen with evolution.

The fifth heresy is  about nuclear weapons. Dyson is a well-known pacifist and proponent of general disarmament. The scientist insists that nuclear (as well as biological) weapons only increase tensions in the world, and do not lead to deterrence, as popular belief says.

Many have a condescending attitude at best to these “heresies”. Dyson is already over ninety, his last serious accomplishments were half a century ago – well, grandfather is out of his mind, let’s be tolerant. The accumulation of carbon dioxide will help us – well, he gave it out!

Фримен Дайсон и его исполинская сфера
Dyson’s son, George, is a renowned science historian. (Photo: Jacob Appelbaum / Flickr / CC BY-SA)

But Dyson did not come up with all these ideas by accident. This is definitely not the case when a person is trying to cling to fame and once again get into the news feed. Dyson wrote about the advent of biotechnology and nuclear weapons in the 1980s – for example, in the books “Infinite in all directions” and “Weapons and Hope”.

He himself admits that he cannot call himself an expert in all areas. “I am not suggesting that these heretical ideas are true,” says Dyson himself. “But pondering them is not at all harmful.” This, perhaps, is the secret of his longevity – both physical and mental: Freeman is interested in literally everything, he approaches any topic so responsibly, as if he is going to devote his whole life to it.

Physicist Marvin Goldberger said that for Dyson there seemed to be no problem that he could not solve. Marvin once worked on an incredibly convoluted integral equation. Dyson passed by and, of course, became interested in the problem. He honestly admitted that he had never seen anything like it, but he made a decision within twenty minutes. Later, this solution was derived by other scientists – and the equation bears their name. Freeman never chased fame or recognition – he just solved interesting problems.

“I still cannot imagine how you can think with such speed and such mathematical clarity. Against him, everyone else seemed inhibited. You can’t learn that. At least I just can’t do that, ”Goldberger said.

Orion Project

One of the famous but unrealized projects that Dyson was involved in was a spacecraft that would be propelled by nuclear explosions. In the United States, work on Orion began after the Soviet satellite was launched. The first Orions were planned to be launched already in 1968 – but in the end, as you know, NASA chose a less complex and dangerous version of chemical-powered rockets. Freeman’s son, science historian George Dyson, wrote a whole book about the history of the project.

Space colossus

All in all, the scientist Dyson is undoubtedly outstanding. But there are many outstanding scientists, but there are few scientists who have come up with a real Idea with a capital letter. And here we come to the idea for which Dyson became famous. This is definitely Dyson’s domain.

Dyson got the idea for this design in the fantastic book by Olaf Stapledon “The Creator of the Stars”. In it, the author describes a journey across the universe, many different races, societies and organizations. Among other things, Stapledon mentions a giant structure located around the star.

Dyson was inspired by this image and in 1960 proposed the idea of ​​such a sphere in his work “Search for artificial stellar sources of infrared radiation.” The scientist suggested that over time, the energy needs of any sufficiently developed civilization become so high that there is only one way to satisfy them. Namely, a colossal structure around the nearest star, which, with the help of batteries and photocells, could absorb and accumulate almost all the energy of the star.

Such a megastructure should become a noticeable source of infrared radiation that is fairly easy to detect. In the 1960s, there was much hope for the search for extraterrestrial life. The search for radio signals had already begun – Freeman proposed another method.

Dyson immediately said that his idea was hypothetical and in any case related to the distant future. He did not set the task of devising a way to build such a sphere. He, as always, was simply guided by the rule “thinking it over is not harmful at all.”

But many people immediately came up with a question: can humanity build such a sphere? And is it even possible to build it?

The radius of a hypothetical sphere around, for example, the Sun (far from the largest star) will be approximately equal to one astronomical unit (150 million kilometers). Not only the Sun would be inside the sphere, but also Mercury and Venus.

Of course, a lot of questions immediately arise. Where to get such a durable material? How long will it take to build?

And if you can answer the above with the vague “well, the technologies of the future, they will come up with something”, then other problems run into the laws of physics.

Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere

The main problem is gravity. Newton put an end to the idea of ​​a monolithic construction by proving the hollow sphere theorem. According to her, within a symmetric shell, the forces of gravity are mutually exclusive, so the body is in weightlessness.

As a result, the sphere will begin to drift and may simply “run over” the star, which will result in a complete disaster. Of course, the structure can be supported, say, with the help of motors – but imagine how much energy is required for constant maneuvers! Another problem is temperature. On the surface of a sphere, it can reach hundreds of degrees Celsius – too much for comfort. The earth is cooled by the atmosphere and rotation, the sphere will have neither one nor the other. There are two ways out: either spend a colossal amount of energy on cooling, or expand the radius of the structure.

Another challenge is the material. In 2012, the head of the board of directors of the American Institute of Ethics and New Technologies (IEET), George Dvorsky, said that humanity could well build a sphere in the next fifty years. He proposed to blow up Mercury, and the resulting material, in fact, and put on the construction site of the century.

Dvorsky’s theses were predictably criticized. There are a lot of questions – from “how, in fact, humanity will explode Mercury” to “how will you transfer the energy received from the Sun to the Earth.”

Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere

Ring with a diameter of 1 au – the simplest form of the Dyson structure

But the main thing is that the mass of Mercury is simply not enough to build a sphere with a radius of 1 astronomical unit. According to some estimates, there will not be enough material in the entire solar system to build a stable structure – the shell will literally be a few centimeters thick. Some crazy asteroid, and …

To solve these problems, Dyson introduced new concepts. He described several megastructures at once (the initial idea was called the “Dyson shell”), in which there is nothing openly impossible or contrary to the laws of physics.

The Roy, or Dyson Cluster,  is a system consisting of a huge number of independent satellites that tightly “stick around” the star, moving in orbit around it. The main difficulty lies in controlling the satellites – after all, you need to ensure that they do not collide, do not go out of orbit and keep a distance between themselves.

Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere

A Dyson bubble is  very similar to a swarm – with one difference: if the swarm is in continuous motion, then the bubble, on the contrary, is static. In the Bubble concept, the star is surrounded by many giant solar sails that remain in place due to the influence of the solar wind. The problem with movement control disappears, but another appears – the satellites should be extremely light and at the same time large.

Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere

Bubbleworld (literally – a bubble world)  is an unusual variation of a space colony, which is also built around a huge sphere filled with hydrogen (a gas giant is also suitable). Along its perimeter there is a vital shell heated by a ball – with soil, air and water.

Dyson’s network  is a huge array of cables and wires stretched from planet to star with photocells that absorb and transmit the energy of the luminary.

Be that as it may, many researchers around the world are still looking for the Dyson sphere – for example, within the SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) project, aimed at finding alien civilizations.

In 2015, astronomers recorded the strange behavior of the star KIC 8462852 – its luminosity over different periods of time (from 5 to 80 days) fell by up to 22%, as if something was blocking it. One of the hypotheses explained the phenomenon by the presence of an artificial structure around the star, like a Dyson swarm. However, there are other versions as well.

Dyson tree

Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere

The Dyson Tree is indeed a tree, but not quite ordinary. First, it must be created from scratch using bioengineering. Secondly, it will not grow in the forest at all. Such trees need to be planted on comets to create an atmosphere on them suitable for human life. Dyson believes that extraterrestrial life will first be discovered not on a planet or satellite, but on a comet or asteroid. And he even put $ 2,000 on it on, a site created to make open-ended bets.


Undoubtedly the most famous piece to show Dyson’s influence is Larry Niven’s The Ringworld. Niven described a giant ring (millions of kilometers in radius) that revolves around a star to create gravity and is surrounded by a thousand-kilometer wall at the edges to contain the atmosphere. Over time, the idea of ​​a ring-world took on a separate life, even eclipsing its progenitor.

Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere
Dyson fence from “Futurama” designed to protect the solar system from illegal immigrants

Peter Hamilton’s Pandora’s Star begins with the discovery of objects similar to Dyson spheres. The sphere is mentioned in “The Rising of Endymion” by Dan Simmons, it is found in “Life Space” by Russian science fiction writer Andrey Livadny. The complete list includes several dozen pieces!

Perhaps the greatest science fiction writer who has dealt with this topic is Stanislav Lem. True, he did not introduce it into his books, but went through it with a roller of criticism. In the collection of essays “The Sum of Technology”, the Polish science fiction writer blows the sphere to smithereens, calling it “a curiosity rather than a concept.” His criticism is fair in everything but one. Lem writes: “Dyson is so convinced of the inevitability of the creation of” near-solar spheres “that he suggests starting a search for them in space …” But, as we know, Dyson was not convinced of anything – he only offered food for thought.

Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere
Dyson sphere up close. Shot from the series “Star Trek: The New Generation”

The Dyson sphere has taken root well in the gaming industry. You can stumble upon it in the Freelancer game. The main character of the game Prey is taken into the sphere. In Sid Meier’s classic strategy Alpha Centauri, building a sphere is considered one of the winning options. In the later stages, it can be built in the games of the Space Empires series. It is built by the geth from Mass Effect, and you can visit it in one of the storylines of the Russian strategy “Star Wolves: Civil War”. And in the wonderful game Euphloria (which was called Dyson in the early stages), you can grow a Dyson tree. In the cinema, Dyson was not lucky – neither the sphere nor his other concepts are practically found there. You can only recall the 1992 series of “Star Trek”. This, however, is understandable – a structure of this scale is too difficult to show realistically.

Frog in a jar

Dyson said: “There are bird scientists, and there are frog scientists. Birds soar high above the vast expanses of mathematics. Frogs swarm in the mud and see only flowers growing nearby. They enjoy looking at specific objects. “Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere

Dyson’s cake opened on the scientist’s 90th birthday (Photo: Andrea Kane, Dan Komoda)

In this classification, Dyson refers to himself as a frog. This could be explained by the inherent modesty of the scientist, but this is not entirely true. Dyson never really explored something in its entirety – he took only a separate, interesting aspect for him, jumping like a frog from one problem to another. And he did not care at all that the project as a whole was impracticable, he did not bother with technical characteristics – for him, a pure idea was always in the first place. His contribution to quantum mechanics, random matrices and astrophysics is enormous – but he seems to have never realized himself to the maximum, preferring to discover more and more new facets of our world.

He has not achieved fame among the masses. The name “Freeman” is more associated with another physicist – a lover of cascade resonances from the Half-Life series. Few know Dyson – he is far from Stephen Hawking or Neil DeGrasse Tyson, he is hardly mentioned in the media. If you score “Dyson” in the search, you will be greeted by an advertisement for vacuum cleaners.

Freeman Dyson and his gigantic sphere

Even at an advanced age, Freeman Dyson does not lose interest in the world around him.

His most famous “invention” – the sphere – he never considered a subject of pride, emphasizing that this was not his idea. For many other scientists, it would even be humiliating – to be known about you only by a near-fantastic concept, which was not even invented by you!

But Freeman Dyson’s ideas inspired and inspire many science fiction writers, artists, game developers. His concepts make people think about something great and distant. Impossible. So, everything is going as it should.


Science & Technology

20 scientific predictions for the next 10 years

We are lucky to be born and live in an incredible time of development of science and technology. We know the approximate rate of development of both, but we have no idea what this rate will be by the end of our life. Things that have long been considered science fiction are becoming components of our lives every day. In the next ten years, the world may present us with gifts that cannot be refused.

The amazing thing about all these scientific discoveries is that they give rise to technologies that further accelerate technological progress. Our ability to innovate grows exponentially as the years go by. 

To give you an idea of ​​the significance of this progression, here are 20 scientific predictions that should occur by 2030.

1. Artificial intelligence (AI) will pass the Turing test, or in other words, the machine will prove that it can think independently.

2. Hyperloop (Elon Musk’s vacuum train project) will start passenger transportation.

3. Biosensors will go on sale, which will call an ambulance if the wearer suddenly becomes ill. In addition, they will remind you to take certain medications, assessing the current state of the body.

4. The level of air pollution will rise, but scientists will come closer to an effective solution to this global problem.

5. Self-driving car will remain a luxury.

6. The world average cost of solar panels will drop sharply, the transition to solar energy will be very rapid.

7. People will return to the moon and begin its consistent colonization.

8. Robots-killers (drones with weapons) will appear. Crime will reach a fundamentally new level. Investigations will come to a standstill.

9. In developed countries, life expectancy will rise sharply. Cancer will cease to be a fatal problem.

10. NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope will be launched, which will help discover hundreds of new earth-like planets and partially learn the chemical composition of their atmospheres.

11. Rapid development of the multi-billion dollar space tourism industry.

12. In the public domain there will be “sources” for printing clothes on a 3D printer. Tens of millions of workers from poor countries will be left without even this low-paying job.

13. If breast cancer is detected on time, the chance of cure will be 100%.

14. The United States will actively grow organs from stem cells from patients themselves. The donation will in fact be liquidated.

15. We will not find extraterrestrial life on Mars. We will probably find it on the moons of Jupiter or Saturn.

16. SpaceX regularly brings people into lunar orbit in preparation for a manned mission to Mars.

17. Global warming will release the oldest viruses. The Chinese coronavirus will seem like a childish joke.

18. The Internet will completely replace television and print media.

19. Tesla cars will become the world’s best-selling cars.

20. Mass DNA editing experiments will begin. Thanks to this, children will be born with “built-in” protection against a huge number of diseases.

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

Designer has created a concept for the electric bike of the future

Futuristic motorcycles have become part of popular culture, associated with the concepts of the near future. They appeared in the film ” Tron: Legacy”, the anime “Akira” and in many video games from the “cyberpunk” genre. Recently, Russian designer Roman Dolzhenko presented his version of the bike of the future.

Russian designer has created a concept for the electric bike of the

MIMIC eBike – the concept of an electric superbike – originally existed as a sketch on a paper napkin. Later, the designer made the idea more realistic by rendering in 3DS max.

Minimalism prevails in motorcycle design. It lacks straight lines and protrusions. The dashboard of the bike is completely digital, and consists of a solid display showing basic information (speed and battery charge status).


There are very few details about the superbike. Social network users are most often concerned about the question: how to turn the steering wheel with this design? The front wheel fairing and handlebar structure appear to be inactive. In an interview for InceptiveMind, Dolzhenko answered this question: the front of the motorcycle turns completely, but at a slight angle.


There is no information on the cost of transport, capacity and production, which is not surprising. MIMIC eBike is just an extremely realistic concept art of the motorcycle of the future. Perhaps in a couple of years, some Elon Musk will adapt the MIMIC design for a real electric superbike.

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

Genes work differently in men and women

All of our cells have the same genes. They can have mutations, however, both in the muscle cell and in the neuron there is a gene for the globin protein, an insulin gene, an acetylcholinesterase gene, etc. But is it worth reminding that a muscle cell is not like a nerve cell? The point is that genes work differently in different cells.

… although these differences should not be exaggerated – even the end sections of chromosomes, which determine biological age, look the same in men and women.

More than ten years ago, a large international team of researchers launched the GTEx (Genotype-Tissue Expression) project, the goal of which was to determine the activity of all genes in all human tissues and organs. Samples of 49 tissues were taken from 838 donors – dead healthy people, mostly elderly. First of all, the DNA was read from each of the donors. Second, the amount of different RNA was analyzed in each tissue. As you know, genetic information from genes in DNA is first read into the messenger RNA (mRNA) molecule, and then proteins are already synthesized on the mRNA molecule (for simplicity, we are not talking about a large class of RNAs that do not encode proteins and which themselves perform various important functions in the cell). The more active a gene is, the more mRNA is read from it. Therefore, by the level of different mRNAs, one can understand where which genes are more active,

The activity of a gene depends on special regulatory sequences, which are also recorded in the DNA – that is, some sections of DNA affect others. By comparing the genetic text in DNA with the amount of different RNAs in different people, one can understand which regulatory regions in DNA affect a particular gene. Such regions (or loci) in DNA are called eQTL, expression quantitative trait loci, which can be roughly translated as loci that determine the level of activity.

As a result of the work, a whole bundle of fifteen articles was recently published in Science , Science Advances , Cell and other journals. Now, using the map of tissue genetic activity for each gene, you can check how it should work in a particular organ or part of it (because several samples were taken from each organ). On the other hand, by looking for a regulatory region (eQTL) in a person’s genome, one can estimate how certain genes will work. It’s genes – because each regulatory eQTL affects more than two genes.

Another important result concerns telomeres, the ends of chromosomes that shorten with each cell division. Telomeres are often used to assess biological age: the shorter they are, the older the body is. But usually blood cells are taken to measure telomeres. What if different fabrics age differently?

The researchers estimated the length of the end sections of chromosomes in 23 tissues, and came to the conclusion that blood does indeed provide an indication of age in general: telomeres in blood cells shorten in proportion to telomeres in other tissues. At the same time, earlier studies were not confirmed, in which female telomeres were on average longer than male ones – that is, neither women nor men have telomere advantages. Which is curious in its own way, since it is believed that women generally live longer than men . This is probably because telomeres are a significant, but not the only indicator of age. In addition, it was not possible to see a strong shortening of telomeres in smokers (here it is worth noting that lung cancer can occur without telomere shortening).

By the way, about women and men. Gender differences are hard to ignore, and we all know that men and women have different sex chromosomes and that men and women have different hormones. Obviously, this should affect the work of genes. Indeed, researchers have found that 37% of our genes work differently in men and women in at least one tissue. Moreover, some genes, relatively speaking, “work” only in one sex. For example, men with different DPYSL4 gene variants will have different body fat percentages. But in women, the DPYSL4 gene does not affect body fat – this does not mean that the gene does not work, just the amount of adipose tissue depends on other genes. Similarly, in men with different variants of the CLDN7 genethere will be different birth weights. In women, birth weight is linked to another gene, HKDC1 .

Many genes, whose activity depends on sex, are associated with diseases, but their “sex” differences were still unknown. Obviously, this information is useful in personalized therapy, when the patient is being treated according to his individual genetic characteristics. However, the authors of the work note that although a lot of “sex-dependent” genes were found, their activity itself does not change very much. In general, the gender genetic differences between men and women are not very large. We emphasize that this is precisely if we take it as a whole – because the genes on which, say, primary and secondary sexual characteristics depend, work in men and women in very different ways.

What else affects gene activity? For example, age – but here there is a gap in the received data. Above we said that the samples were taken mostly from people in years; in addition, more material is needed to analyze age differences across the entire genome. (By the way, it is possible that sex differences are manifested in different ways at different ages.) Some experts, according to The Scientist portal , generally strongly doubt the reliability of the results, because samples were taken from the dead, and not from living people. On the other hand, where can we find healthy volunteers who would allow them to take a piece of tissue from the bowels of their own brain? Subsequent studies are likely to greatly adjust this map of tissue gene activity, but, one way or another, the new data will have something to compare with.

Continue Reading