Connect with us


Facebook removes the “Assault on Area 51” event and then resets it

One of the organizers of the viral event revealed that Facebook temporarily removed the official event to storm Area 51 called as Assault on Area 51. Many suspects that the social network is sharing data from event attendees with a government agency.

area 51

A few weeks ago we spread the news about an event that, at the time, we found curious and clarified that it was a joke. Days later it went viral, with millions of people interested in attending a hypothetical assault on Area 51 in search of evidence of extraterrestrial visits kidnapped by the US government.

Now, one of the administrators of the event, Matty Roberts, has posted on his profile a capture of the notification he has received from the social media giant recently. There it can be read that the assault event in Area 51 “has been eliminated by going against the standards of the Facebook community “:

Assault on Area 51

In an interview for Cnet, Roberts points out that he is not happy with the movement. Since Facebook has not been clear with its motives and it could even be dangerous for those who took the idea of ​​the attack seriously: «I never had any reason for the event to be eliminated. I think it is quite imprudent on Facebook to eliminate the event, especially because I am trying to prevent people from assaulting the base.

Hours after the public complaint of censorship, Facebook mysteriously restored the event, again, and as usual, without giving explanations or details about its actions.

“So … who thinks there is an ongoing data sharing between a certain social network and the” Assault on Area 51 “event page that is now back online?” Speculated researcher John Greenewald of The Black site Vault specialized in obtaining documents from the CIA and the FBI through the Free Information Act (FOIA).

Greenewald’s comment was seconded by many users who think that something like this is possible, especially made known the scandal that involves Facebook and  Cambridge Analytica.

Party in Nevada

The creator of the viral event is now planning a festival in Nevada focused on the theme of Area 51, the same day where the imagined assault was going to take place (September 20). Of course, the latter will not take place in a high security military installation, nor is it a joke either!

Source: Cnet



The Nuremberg Code and the ethics against the upcoming forceful vaccinochipization

Vaccination / chipization is moving by leaps and bounds and people around the world are already starting to think about how to avoid this miraculous manipulation. Of course, no one knows the laws, but in different countries the laws are also different, however, there is a universal law. It is called the Nuremberg Code.

The Nuremberg Code is an international document regulating the principles of conducting medical experiments and procedures on people. The Code was developed and adopted after the Nuremberg trial of doctors in 1947, as a result of which many, many citizens were sent to the gallows, in particular for the forcible administration of different vaccines to people. The code has only ten points and it reads:

1. The absolutely necessary condition for conducting an experiment on a person is the voluntary consent of the latter.

2. The experiment should bring positive results to the society, unattainable by other methods or research methods; it should not be random, essentially non-binding in nature.

3. The experiment should be based on data obtained in laboratory studies on animals, knowledge of the history of the development of this disease or other studied problems. Its holding should be organized in such a way that the expected results justify the fact of its holding.

4. When conducting an experiment, it is necessary to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and damage.

5.None of the experiments should be carried out if there is reason to assume the possibility of death or a disabling injury to the subject; an exception, perhaps, may be cases when research physicians act as subjects in carrying out their experiments.

6. The degree of risk associated with the experiment should never exceed the humanitarian importance of the problem that the experiment is aimed at

7. The experiment should be preceded by appropriate training, and its implementation should be provided with the equipment necessary to protect the subject from the slightest possibility of injury, disability or death.

8. The experiment should be carried out only by persons with scientific qualifications. At all stages of the experiment, those who conduct it or are engaged in it require maximum attention and professionalism.

9. During the experiment, the subject should be able to stop him if, in his opinion, his physical or mental state makes it impossible to continue the experiment.

10. During the experiment, the researcher responsible for carrying out the experiment should be prepared to terminate it at any stage if professional considerations, conscientiousness and caution in the judgments required of it, give reason to believe that the continuation of the experiment may lead to injury, disability or death test subject.

As American lawyers write, the key points are 1 and 6 – that is, the person involved in the vaccination must be capable to give consent; a person should be able to exercise freedom of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, deception, coercion, direct or hidden; the person must possess sufficient knowledge and understanding of the elements of the subject in question. The next universal legal document is called Article 6 of the 2005 UNESCO statement on bioethics and human rights. It is written there:

Article 6, section 1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical interventions should be carried out only with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned on the basis of adequate information. If necessary, consent must be expressed and can be revoked by the person concerned at any time and for any reason.

Article 6, section 3: In no case shall the collective agreement of the community or the consent of the community leader or other authority be a substitute for the informed consent of individuals.

Thus, any orders of a particular Parliament or a celebrated supreme leader on compulsory vaccination will violate Article 6 of the UNESCO statement on human rights and bioethics. Along the way, they violate the Nuremberg Code, in particular Article 1 and Article 6. It is still unknown how the authorities of different countries will try to circumvent these fundamental ethical documents.

Continue Reading


Vaccination passports will be distributed soon, possibly in October

The Department of Defense announced on Tuesday it had a contract with ApiJect Systems America for $ 138 million to create a ready-made supply chain for pre-filled syringes: when the COVID-19 vaccine is available, syringes should be ready.

Under the contract, a subsidiary of ApiJect RAPID USA Inc. will act as part of the Project Jumpstart initiative to create a high-speed supply chain of pre-filled syringes using blown, filled and densified plastic technology, which will enable the production of medical-grade injection devices. The contract will be completed by October 2020.

ApiJect announced Tuesday that it also plans to increase syringe production in 2021, producing 330 million pre-filled BFS syringes per month by the end of the year.

“RAPID USA is led by our diverse team of experienced engineers, pharmaceutical technology experts and management. Our team has made tremendous efforts to ensure that all Americans can receive critical injections when developing and testing drugs, ”says ApiJect Systems America CEO.

Concluding a contract for the early production of vaccine syringes is exceptionally good news, but two things confuse conspiracy theorists. First, what does the Pentagon have to do with vaccines? It is clear when this or that Ministry of Defense enters into a contract with a pharmaceutical company that supplies the military with disposable syringes with promedol or antibiotic there, but what does the Pentagon have to do with vaccines?

It is possible, of course, that the Pentagon wants to vaccinate the military first, but there we are talking about an order for almost one and a half hundred million dollars. It is unlikely that a disposable syringe costs 10 bucks, rather about a dollar, so it comes to vaccinating every US military ten times. It’s a bit much even for people who are very protective of their health.

The second thing that bothers everyone is the entry on the company’s official website:

Regardless of whether the health officials are conducting the planned vaccination program or the pandemic emergency response campaign, they can make better decisions if they know when and where each injection occurs. With an additional RFID / NFC tag on each syringe filled with BFS, ApiJect will make this possible.

Before making an injection, a healthcare professional will be able to launch a free mobile application and “touch” a pre-filled syringe with his phone, capturing a unique NFC tag serial number, GPS location, date / time. The application will then upload the data to a government-selected cloud database.

Here is such an interesting company, this ApiJect, which prepares not just vaccination syringes, but also RFID syringes. Judging by the description of the company, the chip with the identifier is located on the syringe itself, but who knows and who checks it? More likely, ApiJect received an order for syringes with a miracle vaccine from Bill Gates and in this case they will begin to distribute it around the month of October.

Continue Reading


Chinese IT giant used pandemic to develop 5G networks

The coronavirus pandemic not only brought down the global economy , but also stimulated some high-tech industries – 5G mobile networks , robotics , cloud data systems and artificial intelligence. Some data in this area was shared by the Chinese company Huawei.

During the pandemic, network traffic around the world increased sharply – only by 40% in the first week, which is not surprising – people began to hang on the Internet in self-isolation. The time schedule for loading networks has also changed. The usual peak at 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. was added at 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. and 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. , with the main peak in the morning hours – thanks to distance education. 

The second peak is in remote workers. For example, in China, 200 million students study and another 200 million work online. According to China Mobile, traffic in distance education has grown eight times. The epidemic also affected the geographical dynamics of traffic – in business districts it fell by 59%, but grew by 32% in residential areas compared to 2019.

With the abolition of quarantine, traffic will decrease, but it will not be the same, this can be seen from statistics from those areas of China that have returned to normal life. At the peak time of the closure of Chinese cities, traffic grew 1.8 times, but after the opening of cities it still remained 30% -40% higher than before the pandemic.


Until now, killer-application for 5G networks has not appeared in the world. The need to switch to a new format was associated with the spread of unmanned vehicles. But it turned out that in the context of the rapid construction of new infectious hospital buildings, only 5G networks can quickly provide the necessary speed and coverage. So, in two new hospitals in Wuhan, 5G networks were deployed in just 72 hours, and in just seven provinces, 1951 new base stations were installed at the same time.

During the pandemic, new technologies appeared in Chinese hospitals: intelligent robots that collected throat swabs; artificial intelligence-controlled systems for remote temperature measurement; interdepartmental cloud platforms for monitoring and managing the fight against the epidemic; diagnostic systems using artificial intelligence, providing a complete decryption of computed tomography of the lungs with visualization in seconds. All this required high-speed Internet access without delay, which only 5G networks could provide in new hospitals.

Robots in hospitalsRobots in hospitals

Other consumers of the gigantic data sets were transport and medical robots, which during the epidemic began to appear in large numbers in the hospitals of Hubei, Sih, and Jinting. For example, robots for conducting epidemiological control with the functions of remote temperature measurement, disinfection and spraying, which required an upstream channel bandwidth of 30 Mbit / s with a delay of not more than 200 ms. It is clear that in such a compact time it was not possible to develop them from scratch – alteration of patrol robots went into business. There are cheaper analogues with disinfection functions only.

There appeared in the corridors of hospitals and transport robots carrying drugs and food. In some cities, unmanned vehicles were allowed to deliver food to medical personnel. All these robots and drones could not function without 5G networks.

It is clear that these new robots did not play an important role in the fight against the pandemic (unlike powerful information networks with support for artificial intelligence), but investments in these technologies during the pandemic gave a powerful impetus to their development. 

Moreover, they are not going to curtail investments, but on the contrary: the New Infrastructure program adopted in China provides for seven main sectors for accelerated development with powerful support from the state: 5G networks, industrial Internet, high-speed intercity transportation, data processing centers, and artificial intelligence systems , high-voltage power and high-speed charging stations for electric vehicles. The total budget for these programs will be 17 trillion yuan ($ 2.4 trillion). 

“Investing in the future is never too early and will continue despite the pandemic dying out”

Continue Reading