The Facts:Facebook is thinking about removing ‘anti-vaccination’ content from their newsfeed due to political pressures.
Reflect On:What exactly is ‘anti-vaccination’ content? Is questioning vaccine safety credibly a bad thing? Is providing factual information showing vaccines can be dangerous a bad thing? Who’s going to decide what’s ‘misinformation?’
The modern vaccine discussion is there for good reason: some feel they are necessary to prevent infectious disease, while others are witnessing the damage they are causing and asking questions about safety and effectiveness. That’s it in simple grounded terms – but good luck getting mainstream media or mainstream health professionals to talk about this subject in a grounded manner.
Due to the lack of honest reporting, groundedness, and truth around the subject, people have been galvanized into a battle filled with hatred and judgement for those who are choosing not to vaccinate. The same can be said for some who choose not to vaccinate and view those who do as silly, stupid or sheep. The bottom line is, we can’t get to the truth when we are in emotionally aggressive and judgemental states that crowd our common sense.
The rise of emotions has created backlash for Facebook who currently allows for the dissemination of vaccine research and content that questions their safety. This political backlash has prompted Facebook to consider reducing or removing the ‘false’ information from the platform, and they may also decide to demote ‘anti-vaccination’ content from Facebook search results too, according to a statement received by Bloomberg.
The challenge here is, we’re still playing in a divisive world of polarity whereby the assumption is there are pro-vax people and anti-vax people. When in reality, a more honest and nuanced observation would tell you there are pro-vax people based on faith, anti-vax people based on faith, pro-vax people based on choice and then people who simply choose to question vaccinations and do research, which leads them not to vaccinate. The latter are not ‘anti-vax,’ they simply chose to make a choice based on tireless hours of research. To call these people anti-vax, or even any content that questions vaccinations as ‘anti-vax’ is outright incorrect and irresponsible.
Is There A Misinformation Problem?
Now, is there a problem with misinformation on Facebook when it comes to vaccines? Certainly there is. Sometimes content appears on Facebook that is not factual, and yes, users can find that content and if they don’t do their research, may become misinformed. But then again, false and misleading content is found on the CDC website, the WHO website and from almost every mainstream media outlet – and it ends up on Facebook. And it’s not just vaccines, look at how MSM covers modern politics or events like the recent Jussie Smollet case. Shoot first, ask questions later. Retraction, after retraction, after retraction. Yet the damage is already done in most cases. This is why alternative media came about, because there was a need for perspectives that weren’t pushing just a single, corporate, controlled narrative.
But why is the average Facebook user, or ONLY alternative media, penalized when a false story comes out? Why no fair treatment within the many retractions mainstream media must give for their bad journalism and hoaxed reporting?
But back to the topic of vaccines, yes, some vaccine info on Facebook is false, and it comes both from the mainstream media and alternative media. If we are to state that only information from mainstream media, the CDC and WHO is true regarding vaccines, and only that information could be disseminated to people, we would likely have a lot more damaged or dead children from vaccinations. Which leads to an interesting thought, with the hundreds of thousands of children who are not being vaccinated at all, or as frequently, how many lives have actually been saved?
A Facebook spokesperson told Business Insider regarding their stance on vaccine content:
“We are committed to accurate and useful information throughout Facebook. We remove content that violates our Community Standards, down-rank articles that might be misleading, and show third-party fact-checker articles to provide people with more context. We have more to do, and will continue efforts to provide educational information on important topics like health.”
And Facebook has indeed taken a stance on certain subjects. It has recently deleted over 800 Facebook pages that stem from ‘alternative media.’ While some of these pages have disseminated false stories in the past, not all have, yet their deletion goes without explanation. Are vaccine pages and pages who disseminate vaccine content next?
Critics, like Rep. Adam Schiff, the Democrat from California, have been putting pressure on big tech giants like Facebook and Google to take action on stopping ‘anti-vaccine’ information. In a recent letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Google CEO Sundar Pichai he wrote:
“The algorithms which power these services are not designed to distinguish quality information from misinformation or misleading information, and the consequences of that are particularly troubling for public health issues,”
“Additionally, even parents and guardians who seek out accurate information about vaccines could unwittingly reach pages and videos with misinformation.”
Sure they can become misinformed, but they could also see the false and misleading information from the mainstream media and CDC regarding vaccines, and that information does not tell the full picture of the associated dangers with vaccinating children. Just read any vaccine insert and you’ll get an idea of what that looks like.
So the question becomes, who’s going to decide what is false or misleading information regarding vaccines? The very institutions that credible research is debunking?
Further to that, the challenge we still face is in a parent and child relationship. The public is the silly child, and government and Facebook is the parent. Instead of empowering the people with a culture of self-responsibility, we continue to push the idea that someone must always come in and tell us what’s right or wrong. This creates a dependence on government and institutions that continually take advantage of the population.
What You’re Not Being Told About Measles Outbreaks
The CDC has stated that there have been over 100 instances of measles since January – more than the entire year of 2016 when there were only 86. The World Health Organization has even gone on to say that vaccine hesitancy is one of the top 10 threats to global health for 2019. Yet neither the CDC or WHO have any reason to believe, nor evidence to support, that not vaccinating is causing these very minor outbreaks. More children die or are damaged by vaccines in a single year than these outbreaks, and yet we’re simply chalking up not vaccinating as a global health crisis?
The truth is, the CDC and WHO don’t have evidence for their claims because the research says the opposite of what they’re saying.
First off, the Measles are not a scary thing. In fact, in the past, when one kid got the measles, it was common for other kids in the neighborhood to come spend time with the ‘infected’ kid so they too could get the measles and boost their immune system. The hysteria around measles today is a product of the vaccine industry who profited over $1.4 billion off the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) and Varivax (chickenpox) vaccines.
Further, many of the outbreaks of measles we are seeing today are as a result of the vaccinated population.
The CDC consistently claims that the measles have been eradicated when in fact the image and websites below clearly show that measles outbreaks were not eradicated by year 2000 in the US. On top of that, every time a natural increase in cases occurs, action is taken to try and stop vaccine exemptions even though the vaccine itself has been shown to be ineffective even in areas that are 99% vaccinated.
” Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. See research in studies : 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.11.12 Adults have contracted polio from recently vaccinated infants. A father from Staten Island ended up in a wheel chair after contracting polio while changing his daughter’s diaper. He received a 22.5 million dollar award in 2009. 20,21 ” ETC.
2. This link contains pub med studies illustrating outbreaks that have occurred in 100% vaccinated populations and also covers lawsuits pending that indicate MERCK lied about efficacy rates of the MMR.
“An Examination of Scientific Data Re: Vaccine Failures and Failure of Investigative Media Coverage: “
Further to the above information, according to GreenMedInfo:
“Research reveals that a vaccinated individual not only can become infected with measles, but can also spread it to others who are also vaccinated against it – doubly disproving that the administration of multiple doses of MMR vaccine is “97% effective,” as widely claimed.”
“The moral of the story is that you can’t blame non-vaccinating parents for the morbidity and mortality of infectious diseases when vaccination does not result in immunity and does not keep those who are vaccinated from infecting others. In fact, outbreaks secondary to measles vaccine failure and shedding in up to 99% immunization compliant populations have happened for decades. Here are just a few examples reported in the medical literature:
1985, Texas, USA: According to an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987, “An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced.” They concluded: “We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.”1
1985, Montana, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Epidemiology titled, “A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures,” an outbreak of 137 cases of measles occurred in Montana. School records indicated that 98.7% of students were appropriately vaccinated, leading the researchers to conclude: “This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy.”2
1988, Colorado, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Public Health in 1991, “early 1988 an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity … due to an immunization requirement in effect since 1986. They concluded: “…measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations.”3
1989, Quebec, Canada: According to an article published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health in 1991, a 1989 measles outbreak was “largely attributed to an incomplete vaccination coverage,” but following an extensive review the researchers concluded “Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.4
1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: According to an article published in the journal Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, in a measles outbreak from March 1991 to April 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, 76.4% of those suspected to be infected had received measles vaccine before their first birthday.5
1992, Cape Town, South Africa: According to an article published in the South African Medical Journal in 1994, “[In] August 1992 an outbreak occurred, with cases reported at many schools in children presumably immunised.” Immunization coverage for measles was found to be 91%, and vaccine efficacy found to be only 79%, leading them to conclude that primary and secondary vaccine failure was a possible explanation for the outbreak.”6
The challenge here is clear, the blame is being cast upon those who are choosing not to vaccinate (not failing to vaccinate) simply because it goes along with the narrative. It’s as if media, government and the industry doesn’t care about WHY people are choosing not to vaccinate, the research that backs up their choices, and instead are simply working on behalf of the vaccine industry and political pressure.
In no way have we seen that vaccines are truly effective. Most infectious diseases were nearly eradicated prior to the introduction of vaccines due to the sanitation, and even with theories like herd immunity, there is simply no solid evidence that this actually works.
This isn’t to say we cannot have a discussion about vaccines, in fact, that’s precisely what this says. Instead of the emotional side vs. side arguments that are often had, we must begin to look at the vaccine conversation from less of a debate and more of a grounded discussion. It’s irresponsible to aggressively push to either side without calmly and factually looking at the evidence that’s there.
I also feel it’s important we begin to look past this need for governance, and instead start taking responsibility for our own lives. The parent should not always be there to tell us what is right and wrong, we must grow up and learn to stand on our own two feet.
These conversations are best had when we are in a grounded and calm state. If this is something you struggle with and you find yourself continually getting triggered or upset with friends and family, check out our CE Protocol, we got you covered!
UFO Investigator Claims US Navy Designs UFO-Like Craft in Secret
A notable UFO investigator who formerly worked for the British military noted that the design of the craft described in the patent looks similar to that of a suspected UFO allegedly encountered by US fighter pilots over the Pacific fifteen years ago.
A US Navy scientist named Salvatore Cezar Pais has filed a patent for an unusual flying craft that employs an “inertial mass reduction device” to attain “extreme speeds”, and which looks like something straight out of conspiracy theories about military testing UFO-style flying machines, Metro reports.
According to the newspaper, the patent describes methods of reducing an aircraft’s mass via methods which include the generation of gravity waves, and that the craft’s design would allow it to create a vacuum around itself and, thus allowing it to move at high speeds in air, water, or even in space.
“It is possible to envision a hybrid aerospace/undersea craft (HAUC), which due to the physical mechanisms enabled with the inertial mass reduction device, can function as a submersible craft capable of extreme underwater speeds… and enhanced stealth capabilities”, the patent states. “This hybrid craft would move with great ease through the air/space/water mediums, by being enclosed in a vacuum plasma bubble/sheath”.
Nick Pope, former UFO investigator at the British Ministry of Defence, also told the newspaper that the patented design bears a remarkable similarity to “what was reported in the USS Nimitz incident from 2004”, referring to an instance of US warplanes’ radar-visual encounter with an unidentified flying object over the Pacific Ocean.
“There was a similar incident of a UFO flying underwater in Puerto Rico in 2013. The possible connection between the USS Nimitz incident and this patent is intriguing, and it’s interesting that the US Navy seems to be the link here”, Pope observed. “It’s possible that the patent is inspired by the incident and is part of an attempt to work out the technology behind the objects that were chased by the Navy F-18s. This is known as ‘reverse-engineering’”.
He also pointed out that if the US military actually managed to build the technology described in the patent, such a programme would be highly classified, adding that “if any of this works, we’re in game-changing territory”.
Multiple Investigations Reveal Secrets About Where US Tax Dollars Are Really Going
The Facts: Multiple investigations and testimony from high ranking sources have discovered that trillions of dollars of our tax dollars are going towards programs that not even the highest ranking people within government know about.
Reflect On: Why are we made to believe our taxes dollars are going towards necessary services that favour the population? Why do we so easily trust our government and take their word for it when evidence says otherwise.
It’s amazing how much money is scraped off of each paycheque, and how much money multiple small and big businesses pay. We are told that it’s necessary, that this is the money going towards various programs that are responsible for building our schools, employing people for necessary services and infrastructure, among many other things. It’s truly amazing how much money governments rake in from taxes.
It’s an astronomical amount that makes it hard to see how all of the money is allocated to services that are in the people’s favour, instead of the possibility of it going into the pockets of certain politicians and elitists, among other places. Yet we are heavily taxed, and reasons for taxation are constantly brought up and justified, almost as if to imply that there really is no other way of changing things and doing things differently here on planet Earth. Our potential is huge, yet we are convinced that money and taxation are our only ways to operate.
Sure, some of our taxes are going toward various needs and services we deem necessary, but how much off of our paycheques is really required for this? Judging by the amount of money that has been poured into black budget programs, it doesn’t seem like much is needed at all, and this is because trillions upon trillions of our tax dollars are actually going towards projects that the public has absolutely no idea about.
These projects are known as ‘black budget programs,’ which include Special Access Programs (SAPs). Within these we have unacknowledged and waived SAPs. These programs do not exist publicly, but they do indeed exist. They are better known as ‘deep black programs.’ A 1997 US Senate report described them as “so sensitive that they are exempt from standard reporting requirements to the Congress.”
Not many people have investigated the black budget world, but The Washington Post revealed that the “black-budget” documents indicate that a staggering 52.6 billion dollars was set aside for operations in fiscal year 2013.(source) More recent investigations, however, reveal a lot more than that. The topic was discussed in 2010 by Washington Post journalists Dana Priest and William Arkin. Their investigation lasted approximately two years and concluded that America’s classified world has:
Become so large, so unwieldy and so secretive that no one knows how much money it costs, how many people it employs, how many programs exist within it or exactly how many agencies do the same work. (source)
Recently, Arkin quite NBC/MSNBC and went public outing them as completely fake government run agencies. You can read more about that here. Here is another article we published that has links within it to documents showing the close relationship between mainstream media, academia, and the CIA.
The most recent investigation was conducted by economist and Michigan State professor Mark Skidmore, alongside some of his graduate students as well as Catherine Austin Fitts, former assistant secretary of Housing and Urban Development. They discovered trillions of unaccounted for dollars missing from the Department of Housing & Urban Development as well as the Department of Defense. For their research, the team used several government websites and made inquiries to multiple U.S. agencies. Much of the time they received no response and the Office of the Inspector General even disabled links to all key documents that revealed unsupported spending, according to the team.
Given the Army’s $122 billion budget, that meant unsupported adjustments were 54 times spending authorized by Congress. Typically, such adjustments in public budgets are only a small fraction of authorized spending… Skidmore thought Fitts had made a mistake. “Maybe she meant $6.5 billion and not $6.5 trillion,” he said. “So I found the report myself and sure enough it was $6.5 trillion.” – Michigan State News.
They went on to find documents indicating a total of $20 trillion worth of undocumented adjustments made from 1998 t0 2015. Our tax dollars are going directly into these black budget programs, which often cost far more than our roads and services. If this information was made transparent and public for discovery and use, it would leap all of humanity into the stars and into new discovery and exploration. The implications would be huge, and it would force us to ask more questions.
It is ironic that the U.S. would begin a devastating war, allegedly in search of weapons of mass destruction when the most worrisome developments in this field are occurring in your own backyard. It is ironic that the U.S. should be fighting monstrously expensive wars allegedly to bring democracy to those countries, when it itself can no longer claim to be called a democracy when trillions, and I mean thousands of billions of dollars have been spent on projects which both congress and the commander in chief know nothing about. (source)
What’s even more interesting is that Fitts has been quite outspoken about a secret space program and where this missing money is actually going. She explains how enormous amounts of resources were handed over to covert operations to develop a security system of finance. This then created the CIA and a select group of people who were in charge of UFO technology. “By the time JFK came into office ready to challenge this shadow government and make space program the centrepiece of his administration, the civil war between the Deep State and the public state was in full force.” (source)
Interesting to say the least.
The takeaway here is to really question what’s going on with our tax dollars. Whose pockets is the majority of money going into, and for what purpose? What are we really paying for? Secret space programs? Deep underground and under ocean military bases? Have we just been made to believe that the way we are taxed is absolutely necessary? What is really going on here and how come nobody is questioning it?
27 Possible Human Graves Found at Florida Reform School for Boys, Where Children Were ‘Locked in Chains, Beaten and Raped’
Workers may have found 27 more human graves near a notorious Florida reform school shuttered in 2011, where children were said to have been locked in chains, beaten and sexually abused.
‘Anomalies consistent with possible graves’ were uncovered at the site of the former Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys in the Florida Panhandle city of Marianna.Department of Environmental Protection workers made the discovery as they were preparing to clean up fuel storage 500 feet adjacent to Boot Hill Cemetery, Miami Herald reports.The discovery would put the estimated number of bodies buried at the site at 82.The largest gravesite already known is on the northside of the campus, where African-American boys were buried when the school was segregated.
It is at this site where 31 graves are marked with white crosses, but researchers said they believed they do not correspond with actual burial sites.
State officials have for years insisted that 31 boys were interred in the tiny cemetery.
But using high-tech search equipment, forensic scientists have already found evidence of more bodies buried under the site.
The University of South Florida in Tampa said in 2012 they found evidence of at least 50 graves on the school’s property after using ground-penetrating radar and soil samples.
A 2009 investigation report by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), found that there were 81 school-related deaths of students from 1911 to 1973.
But another investigation in 2012, by the University of Florida tea, found as many as 98 deaths at the school from 1914-1973 – including two staff members who perished in the 1914 fire. Some of the bodies were thought to have been shipped home to families but many were buried around the area.
Florida Anthropologists from the University of South Florida removed the first remains from the cemetery at the Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys on September 2, 2013
However, overgrowth on the grounds has hindered researchers from full searches.
Dozier’s own records show that more than 50 children were buried on the grounds, while more than 30 other bodies were sent elsewhere to be buried.
But the school failed to record burial locations for 22 other children who researchers learned died on the site, the Miami Herald reported in 2012.
Six of the children – and two adults – died in the 2014 fire. Several more were killed in an influenza outbreak in the early 1900s.
Some boys died under unknown circumstances, according to relatives.
Governor Ron DeSantis wrote in a Wednesday letter to Jackson County Chairman Clint Pate that ‘during a ground pollution cleanup… anomalies consistent with possible graves have been discovered.’
He said his team ‘is dedicated to collaboratively determining the best course of action’ and shared the DEP, Department of Management Services, the Department of State and the Department of Economic Opportunity would ‘develop a path forward’.
‘Representatives of these agencies will be reaching out to meet with county officials as the first step to understanding and addressing these preliminary findings,’ he stated.
County Administrator Wilanne Daniels said in a statement: ‘We have received the report and are studying the information and findings. We will be working with our State Agency partners to determine the next steps.’
Former students spoke out several years ago with horror stories of sexual abuse and frequent beatings in the White House, at the school.
The school was legend among adolescents for about 100 years in Florida, as the state’s major reform school.
Boys at a Christmas event at the School for Boys in Marianna, Florida in the 1950s
Dozier School was closed in June 2011 by the Department of Juvenile Justice after a years-long controversy over widespread physical and sexual abuse.
Previous investigations and lawsuits have been brought by the ‘White House Boys’ – so called because of the name of the squat, whitewashed building where much of the abuse took place.
Dick Colon, right, and Mike McCarthy, left, recall their times in one of the white house rooms at the Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys during ceremonies dedicating a memorial to the suffering of the ‘White House Boys’ on October 21, 2008
A group of former students sued the state in 2010, but their case was dismissed as the statute of limitations had expired. Other students have written books about their experiences.
State Attorney Glenn Hess previously said only one or two employees from the era are known to be alive, and it’s unlikely a trial could prove how a boy died or who was responsible.