Connect with us

Underworld

Facebook Is Thinking About Removing “Anti-Vaccination” Content As Backlash Intensifies

  • The Facts:Facebook is thinking about removing ‘anti-vaccination’ content from their newsfeed due to political pressures.
  • Reflect On:What exactly is ‘anti-vaccination’ content? Is questioning vaccine safety credibly a bad thing? Is providing factual information showing vaccines can be dangerous a bad thing? Who’s going to decide what’s ‘misinformation?’

The modern vaccine discussion is there for good reason: some feel they are necessary to prevent infectious disease, while others are witnessing the damage they are causing and asking questions about safety and effectiveness. That’s it in simple grounded terms – but good luck getting mainstream media or mainstream health professionals to talk about this subject in a grounded manner.

Due to the lack of honest reporting, groundedness, and truth around the subject, people have been galvanized into a battle filled with hatred and judgement for those who are choosing not to vaccinate. The same can be said for some who choose not to vaccinate and view those who do as silly, stupid or sheep. The bottom line is, we can’t get to the truth when we are in emotionally aggressive and judgemental states that crowd our common sense.

The rise of emotions has created backlash for Facebook who currently allows for the dissemination of vaccine research and content that questions their safety. This political backlash has prompted Facebook to consider reducing or removing the ‘false’ information from the platform, and they may also decide to demote ‘anti-vaccination’ content from Facebook search results too, according to a statement received by Bloomberg.

The challenge here is, we’re still playing in a divisive world of polarity whereby the assumption is there are pro-vax people and anti-vax people. When in reality, a more honest and nuanced observation would tell you there are pro-vax people based on faith, anti-vax people based on faith, pro-vax people based on choice and then people who simply choose to question vaccinations and do research, which leads them not to vaccinate. The latter are not ‘anti-vax,’ they simply chose to make a choice based on tireless hours of research. To call these people anti-vax, or even any content that questions vaccinations as ‘anti-vax’ is outright incorrect and irresponsible.

Is There A Misinformation Problem?

Now, is there a problem with misinformation on Facebook when it comes to vaccines? Certainly there is. Sometimes content appears on Facebook that is not factual, and yes, users can find that content and if they don’t do their research, may become misinformed. But then again, false and misleading content is found on the CDC website, the WHO website and from almost every mainstream media outlet – and it ends up on Facebook. And it’s not just vaccines, look at how MSM covers modern politics or events like the recent Jussie Smollet case. Shoot first, ask questions later. Retraction, after retraction, after retraction. Yet the damage is already done in most cases. This is why alternative media came about, because there was a need for perspectives that weren’t pushing just a single, corporate, controlled narrative.

But why is the average Facebook user, or ONLY alternative media, penalized when a false story comes out? Why no fair treatment within the many retractions mainstream media must give for their bad journalism and hoaxed reporting?

But back to the topic of vaccines, yes, some vaccine info on Facebook is false, and it comes both from the mainstream media and alternative media. If we are to state that only information from mainstream media, the CDC and WHO is true regarding vaccines, and only that information could be disseminated to people, we would likely have a lot more damaged or dead children from vaccinations. Which leads to an interesting thought, with the hundreds of thousands of children who are not being vaccinated at all, or as frequently, how many lives have actually been saved?

A Facebook spokesperson told Business Insider regarding their stance on vaccine content:

“We are committed to accurate and useful information throughout Facebook. We remove content that violates our Community Standards, down-rank articles that might be misleading, and show third-party fact-checker articles to provide people with more context. We have more to do, and will continue efforts to provide educational information on important topics like health.”

And Facebook has indeed taken a stance on certain subjects. It has recently deleted over 800 Facebook pages that stem from ‘alternative media.’ While some of these pages have disseminated false stories in the past, not all have, yet their deletion goes without explanation. Are vaccine pages and pages who disseminate vaccine content next?

Critics, like Rep. Adam Schiff, the Democrat from California, have been putting pressure on big tech giants like Facebook and Google to take action on stopping ‘anti-vaccine’ information. In a recent letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Google CEO Sundar Pichai he wrote:

“The algorithms which power these services are not designed to distinguish quality information from misinformation or misleading information, and the consequences of that are particularly troubling for public health issues,”

“Additionally, even parents and guardians who seek out accurate information about vaccines could unwittingly reach pages and videos with misinformation.”

Sure they can become misinformed, but they could also see the false and misleading information from the mainstream media and CDC regarding vaccines, and that information does not tell the full picture of the associated dangers with vaccinating children. Just read any vaccine insert and you’ll get an idea of what that looks like.

So the question becomes, who’s going to decide what is false or misleading information regarding vaccines? The very institutions that credible research is debunking?

Further to that, the challenge we still face is in a parent and child relationship. The public is the silly child, and government and Facebook is the parent. Instead of empowering the people with a culture of self-responsibility, we continue to push the idea that someone must always come in and tell us what’s right or wrong. This creates a dependence on government and institutions that continually take advantage of the population.

What You’re Not Being Told About Measles Outbreaks

The CDC has stated that there have been over 100 instances of measles since January – more than the entire year of 2016 when there were only 86. The World Health Organization has even gone on to say that vaccine hesitancy is one of the top 10 threats to global health for 2019. Yet neither the CDC or WHO have any reason to believe, nor evidence to support, that not vaccinating is causing these very minor outbreaks. More children die or are damaged by vaccines in a single year than these outbreaks, and yet we’re simply chalking up not vaccinating as a global health crisis?

The truth is, the CDC and WHO don’t have evidence for their claims because the research says the opposite of what they’re saying.

First off, the Measles are not a scary thing. In fact, in the past, when one kid got the measles, it was common for other kids in the neighborhood to come spend time with the ‘infected’ kid so they too could get the measles and boost their immune system. The hysteria around measles today is a product of the vaccine industry who profited over $1.4 billion off the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) and Varivax (chickenpox) vaccines.

Further, many of the outbreaks of measles we are seeing today are as a result of the vaccinated population.

The CDC consistently claims that the measles have been eradicated when in fact the image and websites below clearly show that measles outbreaks were not eradicated by year 2000 in the US. On top of that, every time a natural increase in cases occurs, action is taken to try and stop vaccine exemptions even though the vaccine itself has been shown to be ineffective even in areas that are 99% vaccinated.

1. “Public Health Officials Know: Recently Vaccinated Individuals Spread Disease”

” Scientific evidence demonstrates that individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as MMR (measles, mumps and rubella), rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles and influenza can shed the virus for many weeks or months afterwards and infect the vaccinated and unvaccinated alike. See research in studies : 3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10.11.12 Adults have contracted polio from recently vaccinated infants. A father from Staten Island ended up in a wheel chair after contracting polio while changing his daughter’s diaper. He received a 22.5 million dollar award in 2009. 20,21 ” ETC.

2. This link contains pub med studies illustrating outbreaks that have occurred in 100% vaccinated populations and also covers lawsuits pending that indicate MERCK lied about efficacy rates of the MMR.

“An Examination of Scientific Data Re: Vaccine Failures and Failure of Investigative Media Coverage: “

Further to the above information, according to GreenMedInfo:

“Research reveals that a vaccinated individual not only can become infected with measles, but can also spread it to others who are also vaccinated against it – doubly disproving that the administration of multiple doses of MMR vaccine is “97% effective,” as widely claimed.”

“The moral of the story is that you can’t blame non-vaccinating parents for the morbidity and mortality of infectious diseases when vaccination does not result in immunity and does not keep those who are vaccinated from infecting others. In fact, outbreaks secondary to measles vaccine failure and shedding in up to 99% immunization compliant populations have happened for decades. Here are just a few examples reported in the medical literature:

1985, Texas, USA: According to an article published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 1987, “An outbreak of measles occurred among adolescents in Corpus Christi, Texas, in the spring of 1985, even though vaccination requirements for school attendance had been thoroughly enforced.” They concluded: “We conclude that outbreaks of measles can occur in secondary schools, even when more than 99 percent of the students have been vaccinated and more than 95 percent are immune.”1

1985, Montana, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Epidemiology titled, “A persistent outbreak of measles despite appropriate prevention and control measures,” an outbreak of 137 cases of measles occurred in Montana. School records indicated that 98.7% of students were appropriately vaccinated, leading the researchers to conclude: “This outbreak suggests that measles transmission may persist in some settings despite appropriate implementation of the current measles elimination strategy.”2

1988, Colorado, USA: According to an article published in the American Journal of Public Health in 1991, “early 1988 an outbreak of 84 measles cases occurred at a college in Colorado in which over 98 percent of students had documentation of adequate measles immunity … due to an immunization requirement in effect since 1986. They concluded: “…measles outbreaks can occur among highly vaccinated college populations.”3

1989, Quebec, Canada: According to an article published in the Canadian Journal of Public Health in 1991, a 1989 measles outbreak was “largely attributed to an incomplete vaccination coverage,” but following an extensive review the researchers concluded “Incomplete vaccination coverage is not a valid explanation for the Quebec City measles outbreak.4

1991-1992, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: According to an article published in the journal Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, in a measles outbreak from March 1991 to April 1992 in Rio de Janeiro, 76.4% of those suspected to be infected had received measles vaccine before their first birthday.5

1992, Cape Town, South Africa: According to an article published in the South African Medical Journal in 1994, “[In] August 1992 an outbreak occurred, with cases reported at many schools in children presumably immunised.” Immunization coverage for measles was found to be 91%, and vaccine efficacy found to be only 79%, leading them to conclude that primary and secondary vaccine failure was a possible explanation for the outbreak.”6

The challenge here is clear, the blame is being cast upon those who are choosing not to vaccinate (not failing to vaccinate) simply because it goes along with the narrative. It’s as if media, government and the industry doesn’t care about WHY people are choosing not to vaccinate, the research that backs up their choices, and instead are simply working on behalf of the vaccine industry and political pressure.

The Takeaway

In no way have we seen that vaccines are truly effective. Most infectious diseases were nearly eradicated prior to the introduction of vaccines due to the sanitation, and even with theories like herd immunity, there is simply no solid evidence that this actually works.

This isn’t to say we cannot have a discussion about vaccines, in fact, that’s precisely what this says. Instead of the emotional side vs. side arguments that are often had, we must begin to look at the vaccine conversation from less of a debate and more of a grounded discussion. It’s irresponsible to aggressively push to either side without calmly and factually looking at the evidence that’s there.

I also feel it’s important we begin to look past this need for governance, and instead start taking responsibility for our own lives. The parent should not always be there to tell us what is right and wrong, we must grow up and learn to stand on our own two feet.

These conversations are best had when we are in a grounded and calm state. If this is something you struggle with and you find yourself continually getting triggered or upset with friends and family, check out our CE Protocol, we got you covered!

Source link

Comments

Underworld

Are We Seeing The Power Elite Finally Come Down?

“The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.”–19th century clergyman Theodore Parker

Martin Luther King popularized the quotation above as it was emblematic of his fervent belief that in due time–and he recognized this time could be after he had passed away–true justice would prevail in the world. This notion also resonates with the world’s popular spiritual traditions, where many prophesy that a ‘day of judgment’ would eventually be upon us, a day that would signal the end of one human era and the beginning of another.

Within alternative media, much of this sentiment is currently focused on the high crimes and misdemeanors on the part of rich, powerful, highly-placed people that brave investigators and whistleblowers have revealed, sometimes at the expense of their lives. A growing number of awakening people in this space have suffered great frustration and sorrow from the ongoing immunity to prosecution that the perpetrators of some of the greatest criminal conspiracies in our history have enjoyed under the cover of deception, misinformation, threats,  bribery, and the very effective ridicule of the ‘conspiracy theory’.

When it is all said and done, we may come to realize that our whole lives have been lived amidst an institutionalized ‘Perversion of Justice,’ to quote the excellent Miami Herald investigative exposé on the crimes of billionaire Jeffrey Epstein, who is actually the focal point of this article. A newly unsealed indictment against Epstein may signal a ray of hope that the dawn of the fabled ‘day of judgment’ may have just arisen on our planet.

Epstein Arrested July 6th

If you haven’t heard about Jeffrey Epstein’s arrest, here is the information coming from a Miami Herald article entitled ‘Epstein’s Arrest Could Bring Down Many Other Powerful Individuals‘: 

Jeffrey Epstein, 66, was arrested at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey shortly before 4 p.m. Saturday, July 6th as he arrived on his private jet from Paris.

About an hour after they picked him up, federal agents arrived at his imposing Manhattan townhouse, breaking down the door to execute search warrants.

The fact that search warrants were issued shows that federal investigators have new evidence against Epstein beyond the sex cases he was given federal immunity for in Florida in 2008, legal experts told the Miami Herald.

The reason they know there is new evidence is because they couldn’t use evidence from a Florida court case to get a search warrant in the state of New York. So the warrant, at least, was based on sufficient evidence of criminality in New York. It also should be noted that the Department of Justice has said that it is not rescinding the plea deal Jeffrey Epstein got in his previous conviction even though it has been determined to have been illegal.

Although details of the case remain undisclosedthere are indications that others involved in his crimes could be charged or named as cooperating witnesses.

The fact that others involved in his crimes could be charged is quite significant, since it indicates that law enforcement and the judiciary are not shying away from proving a CONSPIRACY in this case. This is quite different from his earlier conviction in Florida in 2008, which was ‘soliciting an underage girl for prostitution.’

In a larger sense, it seems as though the days of our law enforcement and judiciary avoiding the conspiracies perpetrated by the rich and famous are ending. The NXIVM Sex Cult convictions was a recent indication. We are now getting a clearer picture that much of the ills in our known history are the result of the criminal conspiracy of powerful people, and no longer are we buying the ‘conspiracy theory’ slander.

Epstein Indictment Unsealed July 8th

Upon reading the indictment in full, the two counts being brought against Epstein are: Sex Trafficking Conspiracy (Count 1) and  Sex Trafficking (Count 2). These are taken directly from the indictment:

(Count 1, Sex Trafficking Conspiracy) From at least in or about 2002, up to and including in or about 2005, in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit an offence against the United States, to wit, sex trafficking of minors, in violation of title 18, United States Code, section 1591(a) and (b).

(Count 2, Sex Trafficking): From at least in or about 2002, up to and including in or about 2005, in the Southern District of New York, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, the defendant, willfully and knowingly, in and affecting interstate and foreign commerce, did recruit, entice, harbor, transport, provide, and obtain by any means a person, knowing that the person had not attained the age of 18 years and would be caused to engage in a commercial sex act, and did aid and abet the same, to wit, EPSTEIN recruited, enticed, harbored, transported, provided, and obtained numerous individuals who were less than 18 years old, including but not limited to Minor Victim-1, as described above, and who were then caused to engage in at least one commercial sex act in Manhattan, New York. (Title 18, United States Code, section 1591(a), (b)(2) and 2.).

In other words, he is not being charged with having sex with underage girls as such, although the fact that he did will be demonstrated in the trial in order to prove that he engaged in sex trafficking and sex trafficking conspiracy.

We will note here that there is no mention in the indictment about Epstein’s role in providing underage girls to other famous people, such as Bill Clinton, lawyer Alan Dershowitz, and Prince Andrew of England, among others, who allegedly were ‘clients’ of Epstein’s sex trafficking operation and were named in the flight logs to his private island of Little St. James, dubbed ‘Pedo Island.’

However, this indictment has been enough to motivate Bill Clinton to have a spokesperson put out a public denial of his involvement in any of Epstein’s crimes:

“President Clinton knows nothing about the terrible crimes Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty to in Florida some years ago, or those with which he has been recently charged in New York. In 2002 and 2003, President Clinton took a total of four trips on Jeffrey Epstein’s airplane: one to Europe, one to Asia, and two to Africa, which included stops in connection with the work of the Clinton Foundation.” (source)

“Staff, supporters of the foundation, and his Secret Service detail traveled on every leg of every trip. He had one meeting with Epstein in his Harlem office in 2002, and around the same time made one brief visit to Epstein’s New York apartment with a staff member and his security detail. He’s not spoken to Epstein in well over a decade, and he has never been to Little St. James IslandEpstein’s ranch in New Mexico, or his residence in Florida.” (source)

This despite a 2016 Fox report citing court documents that Clinton flew on Epstein’s “Lolita Express” to Little St. James island 26 times.

This is just one sign that it is not business as usual for the rich and powerful people for whom there are rampant allegations of criminal behavior but who have not been indicted for them. Again, while the criminal charges against Jeffrey Epstein do not directly involve any of his rich and powerful friends, there is always the possibility that testimony implicating such people could be made public during this trial, and perhaps that is what people like Bill Clinton are now afraid of.

Prosecutor’s News Conference July 8th

The news conference that announced the unsealing of Epstein’s indictment was very clear and forthright about the crimes Epstein committed and the repugnant nature of these crimes. Rather than operating in a veil of secrecy, like we are so used to in the past, there was an openness and explicitness about these crimes, something that I feel has been happening regarding sex trafficking crimes since early in the Trump presidency, with former Attorney General Jeff Sessions and others. If you watch the video of the news conference below, you might agree that U. S. Attorney Geoff Berman seems to be sincere in offering victims the support of the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and asking victims to come forward to have their day in court and help bring perpetrators to justice:

While the charged conduct is from a number of years ago, it is still profoundly important to the many alleged victims, now young women. They deserve their day in court, and we are proud to be standing up for them by bringing this indictment. Combating sex trafficking and exploitation of children is a priority for this office, and for the Department of Justice, as the sexual abuse of a minor can have devastating effects on victims, often lasting for years. That is why my office will not rest, until perpetrators of these types of crimes are brought to justice. Victims’ voices, including the many voices of Epstein’s alleged victims, must be heard. To that end, I want to say to anyone who is watching this, or hearing about our prosecution, if you believe you are a victim of this man, Jeffrey Epstein (pointing at Epstein’s picture), or you have evidence or information relating to the conduct alleged in the indictment unsealed today, we want to hear from you. Please call 1-800-CALL-FBI. That’s 1-800-CALL-FBI.

If there are victims out there who have heard this message and are afraid to speak up, it is quite understandable. The entire culture we have been living in has up to now consistently failed victims again and again, not just for not having been protected in the first place, but then for having their testimony ignored and not acted upon when they go to law enforcement, and again to be unprotected from threats and otherwise improperly treated during the judicial process.

Having said that, victims who have not spoken in the past still may consider this as an opportunity to have their day in court. Although I can’t be certain, I am seeing many indications that things are different right now, and that there is an earnest desire not only to prosecute these crimes to the full extent of the law, but to protect and honor the victims.

If we go back to his Epstein’s earlier conviction, it seems as though such an earnest desire was not there. Epstein was shown to have attempted to intimidate many of the would-be accusers, or pay them off in exchange for non-disclosure. From the government side, then-prosecutor and current Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta let Epstein walk away with a sentence that some have called ‘the most lenient plea deal in history.’ However, according to Vicki Ward, who has written extensively on Epstein, when Acosta interviewed for the Secretary of Labor position, he told the Trump transition that

‘He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone.” ‘

Like Clinton, who has been out trying to deny allegations connecting him with the crimes of Jeffrey Epstein, Acosta is out there defending his plea deal as justified and even noble, and certainly is giving no indication that he had been bullied by intelligence agencies. (Update July 12th: Alex Acosta has just resigned from his position as Secretary of Labor)

This is another little clue that adds to the notion that the rich and powerful are starting to get concerned, and are trying to get out in front of the story they see unfolding in the public arena. It seems less likely that U. S. Attorney Geoff Berman will cave in to threats from ‘above’, and as mentioned before, may be inviting witness to come forward in order to implicate more high-profile people in these activities.

Epstein Detention Hearing July 15th

I believe what happens at Epstein’s detention hearing on July 15th will reveal a lot. This is when it will be determined if Epstein will have to remain in detention prior to the trial. Prosecutors have argued strenuously that Epstein should be detained without bail pending trial.

Defense lawyers have proposed a bail package on Thursday that would allow Epstein to remain out of jail pending trial and live instead in ‘home detention’ at his Upper East Side mansion, one of the largest residences in Manhattan and valued at $77 million, according to court documents. The arrangement also would put Epstein under electronic monitoring by GPS, require him to post a “substantial” personal recognizance bond secured by his Manhattan home, and deregister and ground his private jet.

These are greater lengths than rich and powerful people are used to having to offer in order to be free pending trial. Indeed, the defense appears to be on the defensive more than in the past when representing someone as high-profile as Epstein. If the court decides to keep Epstein in detention pending trial, this will be another clue that the power has shifted significantly. If Epstein is let out on bail, then we may still have reason for concern.

The Takeaway

I have noted here that there is some indication, based on the recent arrest and indictment of Jeffrey Epstein, that the rich and powerful elite who have perpetrated horrendous crimes against humanity are no longer immune to being brought to justice.

Now, if we can piece together Jeffrey Epstein’s past activities and connections with other high-profile people in a way that starts to give us the big picture, we may have even more compelling reasons to believe that a cavalcade of justice is going to be served on a global elite that has ruled the planet since time immemorial. For this reason, I will soon be working on a companion article to this one, exploring information about how Epstein actually became a billionaire, his connection to the ruling class, and speculations about the real activities that have gone on at Little St. James island.

As always, awareness is the key. Know the truth, and it shall set you free. For the sake of the victims, for the sake of humanity, I invite you to continue exploring with me the difficult and painful revelations about the past treatment of human beings by the global elite. That will help us come to understand the patterns of deceit and control that have been used against us, in order to empower ourselves to walk away from this entire system and free humanity in the process.

Source link

Continue Reading

Underworld

The 5G Dragnet

James Corbett, Corbett Report
Waking Times

Telecom companies are currently scrambling to implement fifth-generation cellular network technology. But the world of 5G is a world where all objects are wired and constantly communicating data to one another. The dark truth is that the development of 5G networks and the various networked products that they will give rise to in the global smart city infrastructure, represent the greatest threat to freedom in the history of humanity.

For those with limited bandwidth, CLICK HERE to download a smaller, lower file size version of this episode.

Source link

Continue Reading

Underworld

Elon Musk warns A.I. could create an ‘immortal dictator from which we can never escape’

  • Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk said that artificial intelligence “doesn’t have to be evil to destroy humanity.”
  • In a new documentary, “Do You Trust This Computer?”, Musk warned the creation of superintelligence could lead to an “immortal dictator.”
  • Musk believes that humans should merge with AI to avoid the risk of becoming irrelevant.

Superintelligence — a form of artificial intelligence (AI) smarter than humans — could create an “immortal dictator,” billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk warned.

In a documentary by American filmmaker Chris Paine, Musk said that the development of superintelligence by a company or other organization of people could result in a form of AI that governs the world.

“The least scary future I can think of is one where we have at least democratized AI because if one company or small group of people manages to develop godlike digital superintelligence, they could take over the world,” Musk said.

“At least when there’s an evil dictator, that human is going to die. But for an AI, there would be no death. It would live forever. And then you’d have an immortal dictator from which we can never escape.”

The documentary by Paine examines a number of examples of AI, including autonomous weapons, Wall Street technology and algorithms driving fake news. It also draws from cultural examples of AI, such as the 1999 film “The Matrix” and 2016 film “Ex Machina.”

Musk cited Google’s DeepMind as an example of a company looking to develop superintelligence. In 2016, AlphaGo, a program developed by the company, beat champion Lee Se-dol at the board game Go. It was seen a major achievement in the development of AI, after IBM’s Deep Blue computer defeated chess champion Garry Kasparov in 1997.

Musk said: “The DeepMind system can win at any game. It can already beat all the original Atari games. It is super human; it plays all the games at super speed in less than a minute.”

The Tesla and SpaceX CEO said that artificial intelligence “doesn’t have to be evil to destroy humanity.”

“If AI has a goal and humanity just happens to be in the way, it will destroy humanity as a matter of course without even thinking about it. No hard feelings,” Musk said.

“It’s just like, if we’re building a road and an anthill just happens to be in the way, we don’t hate ants, we’re just building a road, and so, goodbye anthill.”

Last year, Musk warned that the global race toward AI could result in a third world war. The entrepreneur has also suggested that the emerging technology could pose a greater risk to the world than a nuclear conflict with North Korea.

Musk believes that humans should merge with AI to avoid the risk of becoming irrelevant. He is the co-founder of Neuralink, a start-up that reportedly wants to link the human brain with a computer interface.

He quit the board of OpenAI, a non-profit organization aimed at promoting and developing AI safely, in February.

Source www.cnbc.com

Continue Reading

Trending