Connect with us

Underworld

Experts Horrified by Leaked CRISPR Baby Study

Chinese scientist He Jiankui’s creation of the world’s first gene-edited human babies was undoubtedly one of the most impactful science stories of 2018.

But for as much attention as the experiment received, the paper detailing it was never actually published — until now.

On Tuesday, MIT Technology Review published excerpts from a copy of He’s manuscript, titled “Birth of Twins After Genome Editing for HIV Resistance,” which it obtained from a source earlier in 2019.

The outlet also shared the manuscript with a legal scholar, a doctor specializing in in vitro fertilization, an embryologist, and a gene-editing specialist — and the experts’ reactions to He’s CRISPR baby study confirm that it was an absolute ethical nightmare.

The MIT Tech Review story highlights 13 problems the experts found with the paper, not least of which is the fact that the researchers behind it never managed to actually prove their claims that the experiment was “successful.”

Additionally, the experts note that He and his co-authors seem to have made deliberate attempts to conceal some key information, such as by not naming the doctors involved in the experiment.

In other instances, He’s team appears to have outright lied, for example by noting in the manuscript that the twins were born in November 2018 when people familiar with the experiment have said the birth occurred in October.

The experts told MIT Tech Review that reading the manuscript not only left them concerned that the parents involved in the CRISPR baby study only participated to gain access to in vitro fertilization — and not to prevent their offspring from inheriting the father’s HIV — but also that the doctors involved in the experiment might not have even known what was happening.

“Approaching this document, I was hoping to see a reflective and mindful approach to gene editing in human embryos,” Rita Vassena, scientific director of assisted reproduction company Eugin Group, told MIT Tech Review.

“Unfortunately, it reads more like an experiment in search of a purpose,” she continued, “an attempt to find a defensible reason to use CRISPR/Cas9 technology in human embryos at all costs, rather than a conscientious, carefully thought through, stepwise approach to editing the human genome for generations to come.”

Source link

Comments

Underworld

This Story Behind Crocodile Louis Vuitton Bags Will Haunt You Forever!

WARNING: This article contains disturbing images and video not suitable for all viewers. Viewer discretion is advised.

Over the past several years, animal rights activists have been protesting against the world-famous fashion designer Louis Vuitton, for its use of crocodile skins in its products. Organizations like PETA have exposed the brutal conditions at the crocodile farms where the designer sources leather for many of its products. In 2017, PETA even purchased a significant stake in Louis Vuitton’s parent company, LVMH, which allowed them access to shareholder meetings where they were able to question executives about their business practices.After years of pressure from activists, both in the streets and in the board room, LVMH promised to implement new measures to ensure a “responsible supply” of crocodile skins.

However, PETA responded to the announcement with a statement that said, “LVMH’s assurances of “responsibly-supplied” crocodile skin are tosh, given that it will apparently take the company nearly two years to get around to ensuring pretty much nothing. Most importantly, the standard won’t prevent the worst of the cruel practices: the method of slaughter, which consists of cutting the back of the crocodile’s neck and thrusting a metal rod down the live animal’s spine, causing unimaginable agony.”

The PETA spokesperson also pointed to other fashion designers such as Chanel, Victoria Beckham, Vivienne Westwood, and Diane von Furstenberg, who have promised to stop turning “exotic animals into fashion accessories.”

Some of the fashion accessories on Louis Vuitton’s website can go for as much as £31,000.

LVMH has promised to ensure that the animals are being treated with compassion while they are killed, but they have been unclear about the specifics of how their process has changed.

The footage below shows the results of a PETA investigation that initially exposed what was taking place in the production of Louis Vuitton fashion accessories. In the footage, the animals have their necks cut open and then have rods shoved down their throat while they are still alive. They are then skinned while they are still bleeding and moving. Next, they are confined to small, barren enclosures and packed into concrete pits before their skin is cut and pulled off.

PETA and other animal rights organizations do not believe that the production methods employed by LVMH have changed since their promise to improve standards last year, and are still campaigning for them to stop using exotic animal skins altogether.

Image Credit: Peta Asia

Source link

Continue Reading

Underworld

8 Things to Consider Before Panicking About the Coronavirus

Phillip Schneider, Staff Writer
Waking Times

If you read the news, you’ve likely heard about the “deadly” coronavirus in China. You’ve probably seen videos of sick people and heard about the impending doom that our great nation faces if we don’t do something about this grave threat coming from China.

But have you ever thought about why we’re hearing so much about this virus, despite it affecting only a relatively small number of people in another country? Who benefits from a mass media hype around the Coronavirus?

1. This Story is Getting Massive Hype

No one can deny the incredible hype that this story is getting. But, why?

Nearly every major news outlet is front-paging the news about the virus. NBC warns of the rising death toll, CNN frightens us with “diving” stocks due to coronavirus fears (the DOW dropped by 0.6% while other stocks like Bowing grew by 1.7%), the Drudge Report sounds the alarm on the spreading outbreak triggering the quarantine of 56 million people, but China’s state run communist newspaper, the People’s Daily, reports only 41 total deaths from coronavirus and 34 cured and released, with the total number of confirmed cases to date at 1287.

Yet, every new development is serious front page news. CNBC released an updating map of those affected by the virus. In China, it looks like they are absolutely swamped with illness, however, to say that the true number of cases is minuscule compared with China’s population of 1.4 billion would be the world’s greatest understatement of the century.

Is the media simply reporting justifiably on a virus that could potentially affect millions of people, or do they have ulterior motives?

2. Nobody Knows Where the Virus Came From

So, where did the virus come from anyway? Some speculate it originated in snakes, or previously from bats or contact with other animals in an open-air food market in Wuham, but if that’s true, is there no connection to the fact that the Chinese government opened up a new biolab in the same city, allegedly tasked with studying the “world’s most dangerous pathogens”? Even the science journal Nature was concerned with the facility prior to its operation in 2017.

So, did the Chinese government accidentally or intentionally release the virus? Did it end up in bats, then snakes, then humans? Why were they working on studying this virus in the first place, and who benefits from its release?

3. The Media Makes Top Dollar from Your Fear

Along with America’s other biggest go-nowhere news story of the week, Trump’s impeachment process, the media rakes in huge sums of money from reporting on medical fear stories. Media executives know that people will tune in to watch a deadly virus sweep the globe. The fear that you experience from thinking about the potential for mass quarantine and death, paralyzes and keeps most people locked into consuming more fear-inducing coverage. Hence, more moola for the fat cats at CNN, NBC, etc. Bad news is good for business, and while statistically speaking you should be far more concerned for your safety every time you get into an automobile, nothing gets clicks like fear and panic.

4. Governments Always Seek More Control from Virus Scares

What is the logical conclusion for a population of fearful and paralyzed individuals with no experience combatting a new and deadly virus? Giving the authorities more power, of course.. Let the government forcefully inoculate you and your family, allow the medical-industrial complex to take more of your hard-earned money, and watch silently with the fear that standing up for your rights might lead to the destruction of the human race.

5. This Happens Every Few Years and Pushes Important Issues to the Back Page

It isn’t hard to find examples of medical hysteria in the past, either. Think back to Ebola, the Swine flu, the regular flu, measles, SARS, or even the plague. Every few years, the media ramps up its coverage of a new virus that often harms a very insignificant number of people. The medical establishment calls for more control, governments call for more control, and important stories get vigorously back-paged. As a nation, we end up wasting valuable time on a non-issue that was never going to matter to begin with, the only net-result being a marked increase in fear and stress.

6. The Coronavirus Doesn’t Affect You

Chances are pretty solid that you won’t even meet someone who was affected in any way by the coronavirus. Statistically, it makes no sense to worry about the virus when you likely know someone personally who was or will be affected by poverty, the drug war, junk food-induced diabetes, opiate addiction, cancer, heart-disease, the looming national debt, war, a lack of clean food or water, stress, taxation, unconstitutional no-knock SWAT raids, pollution, depression, etc. Focusing all of your attention on this new fear is illogical when you consider that we live in a world of daily threats and dangers anyhow. And by the way, spoiler alert… none of us make it out of here alive.

Furthermore, those who are dying from the virus are not actually dying from the virus, but rather from health complications resulting from having the virus and a compromised immune system, like pneumonia. If the national media genuinely wanted you to be safe, they would be running wall-to-wall coverage of how to naturally boost your immune system and get your body into a state of maximum health, but they rarely mention this fact.

7. The Institutions Who Benefit from Coronavirus Hype are Incompetent and Dangerous

The institutions, including the CDC, vaccine companies, and media who benefit from coronavirus hype, are incredibly incompetent and dangerous. One might even go so far as to call them diabolical. We all know about the infamous and highly-publicized syphilis experiments that began in the 1930’s, and CDC director Dr. Branda Fitzgerald who was forced to resign in early 2018 after she was caught buying shares of Merck, a major vaccine company that the CDC is supposed to oversee. There’s no shortage of medical corruption in the U.S., both historically and contemporarily, if you look hard enough. Already the pharmaceutical industry is ‘racing to develop a vaccine,’ which when coupled with government mandates equals insane revenue.

8. Grainy Videos of Dead and Sick-Looking People Are Being Used to Scare You

To top it all off, much of the evidence we’re getting from the media is sketchy at best. Earlier, the Daily Star ran a photograph of two men in lab coats, one of which was lying on the ground. The photo is extremely grainy and out of focus. Meanwhile, what are we supposed to make of it? There’s no context here or proof that the photo is really what they say it is. Yet, it was featured in all caps on the drudge report. “DOCTORS COLLAPSE”, it says along with a plethora of other headlines.

Experts fear too late for China
Everyone will get infected
Simulation Predicts 65 Million Could Die

Anyone who’s been paying attention could have predicted the rise of the coronavirus and know what the outcome will be. Mass hysteria and collective fear will be used to further erode individual liberties and stoke allegiance to the medical industrial complex. By simply being aware, however, that fearing all the news is illogical, while continuing to focus on your health and wellness, you automatically subvert this attempt at mass control.

About the Author

Phillip Schneider is a student as well as a staff writer and assistant editor for Waking Times. If you would like to see more of his work, you can visit his website, or follow him on the free speech social network Minds.

This article (8 Things to Consider Before Panicking About the Coronavirus) as originally created and published by Waking Times and is published here under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Phillip Schneider and WakingTimes.com. It may be re-posted freely with proper attribution, author bio, and this copyright statement.

Source link

Continue Reading

Underworld

FCC broke environmental law by approving SpaceX satellites

Astronomers and other reliable sources continue to warn of similar satellites and spacecraft, creating dangerous situations on Earth and in space.

FCC broke environmental law by approving SpaceX satellites
Illustration of the Starlink satellites.

Regardless, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) continues to approve tens of thousands of satellites being launched into orbit, anyway.

Now, a new article suggests that the agency may have violated the environmental law by approving the Starlink Mega Constellation from SpaceX (which includes up to 42,000 spaceships) and that if someone sues them, that person could win the case.

Published in Scientific American:

A battle for the sky is taking place, and the skies are losing. The next mega satellite constellations, designed to cover Earth’s orbit in spaceships that transmit high-speed Internet around the world, could fill the firmament with tens of thousands of moving light points, forever changing our view of the cosmos. .

Astronomers who depend on pristine skies for their profession and members of the general public who appreciate the natural beauty of what is above, may lose out. The launch of such a large number of satellites “has the potential to change our relationship and our connection with the universe,” says Ruskin Hartley, CEO of International Dark-Sky Association, non profit organization.

But without binding international laws or regulations in place to protect the night sky, anyone who opposes the advancing mega constellations is certainly fighting a losing battle. Right?

Wrong.

A new article to be published later this year in Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law argues that the Federal Communications Commission – the agency responsible for licensing the operation of these constellations in the United States – should consider the impact that these satellites would have on the night sky.

By ignoring an essential part of federal environmental legislation, the FCC could be prosecuted – and lose – potentially interrupting new releases of mega constellations until an appropriate review is carried out.

The FCC must protect the public by regulating the telecommunications sector. At the moment, they are facing many lawsuits for failing to do so in connection with the forced installation of unsafe 5G technology. Hopefully someone will sue them for approving those satellites too.

Source

Continue Reading
Advertisement

DO NOT MISS

Trending