Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Underworld

Evolution of the Quadrobics: Connection to animal “personas” or another aspect of Darwinism

Evolution of the Quadrobics: Connection to animal "personas" or another aspect of Darwinism 1

The “theory of evolution” suggests that humans are animals that became distinct within the primate order through “natural selection.” This perspective implies that human desires and aspirations are essentially evolved forms of basic animal instincts, such as dominance and consumption.

In the animal kingdom, it is often said that the fittest survive. Similarly, the evolution of humans, a species not best adapted to its natural environment, has progressed within its own societal constructs. However, in this context, “the fittest” has come to mean the most cunning, bold, and ruthless.

Evolution of the Quadrobics: Connection to animal "personas" or another aspect of Darwinism 2

The prevailing formula for raising children suggests that it is the most cunning and brazen individuals who will grow up to achieve the greatest success, rather than the smartest or kindest. This is evident as we witness, at the close of the 20th century, a “civilized” world where the pedestals of success are rarely occupied by GREAT thinkers, scientists, writers, poets, composers, or artists.

Conversely, since the inception of Forbes magazine in September 1917, the primary animalistic benchmark of success has been consumption. This raises the question: Who truly benefits from this? It appears that the producers of desires, the sellers of goods and services, are the ones who gain.

Simultaneously, there were practices that starkly revealed the tendency to view humans as mere animals. This is evident in the application of social Darwinism, which manifested in segregation, human zoos, forced sterilizations in the United States and Europe, racial hygiene, and fascist concentration camps, normalizing the dehumanization of individuals.

The influence of Darwinism in Germany was particularly dramatic, as ideologues of the Third Reich adopted the concept of “natural selection.” The fascination with Darwin’s ideas and the principle of survival and the triumph of the fittest, or “chosen,” permeates Hitler’s Mein Kampf. The following quote from his work demonstrates the link between the ideas of Mein Kampf and Darwin’s theory: “He who wishes to live must fight; those who do not wish to fight in this world, where perpetual struggle is the law of life, have no right to exist.”

For those unfamiliar with the complete understanding of Darwin’s work, it is titled “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life”. Additionally, it can be cited as “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Selected Races in the Struggle for Life”.

Social Darwinism in Germany is often linked to eugenics, which is the concept of human selection. As the National Socialists, under Hitler’s leadership, rose to power, they shifted from social-Darwinist theory to practical eugenics research. The Third Reich tasked scientists with distinguishing the “superior” Aryan race from other races, aiming to restore Aryan “purity” and create policies to exclude the latter.

Eugenics emerged roughly seven decades before Hitler’s rise to power, initially taking shape as a purportedly fundamental “academic” science. It was in England that the doctrine was born, with English psychologist Francis Galton (1822–1911), a cousin of Charles Darwin, being recognized as its progenitor. Galton laid down the basic tenets of eugenics in late 1863. In “The Origin of Species,” it was the chapter “Variability in Domesticated Animals” that particularly captured Francis’s interest.

In the United States, the precepts of negative eugenics were not only articulated but also put into practice. Indiana passed and implemented a sterilization law in 1904, targeting individuals deemed “inferior,” including alcoholics, the mentally ill, and habitual criminals, for compulsory sterilization. The method, deriving its name from the state, was termed “Indian” and gained considerable traction—within 26 years, it had been adopted by an additional 40 states.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The Carnegie Institution was instrumental in the inception of American eugenics, establishing a laboratory complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island. This hub became a focal point for eugenics proponents to influence American lawmakers, social services, and various associations. In the 1920s, eugenicists from the Carnegie Institution forged significant personal and professional ties with German fascist eugenicists. Hitler, in his 1924 publication “Mein Kampf,” alluded to the principles of American eugenics, evidencing an extensive understanding of the subject.

Evolution of the Quadrobics: Connection to animal "personas" or another aspect of Darwinism 3

Proponents of eugenics included notable figures such as Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Winston Churchill. U.S. Supreme Court Justices Oliver Wendell Holmes and Louis Brandeis endorsed it, with Holmes ruling in its favor. George Bernard Shaw proclaimed that eugenics was humanity’s only hope for salvation.

Eugenicists forcibly sterilized 60,000 Americans, prohibited thousands from marrying, and relocated thousands to “colonies,” committing numerous acts that remain under study. Eugenics transitioned from a racist ideology to national policy, influencing laws on forced sterilization, segregation, and marriage restrictions in 27 states.

Post-World War II, eugenics was recognized in academia as the ideological foundation for Nazi atrocities, including racial hygiene practices, human experimentation, and the annihilation of “undesirable” social groups.

Historically, the comparison of humans to apes was highlighted by Swedish naturalist and physician Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778), who, despite not questioning the divine creation of humans, boldly conducted a comparative anatomical and physiological analysis of the two species during a time when Christianity was dominant, leading to the Vatican’s long-term ban on his work.

Charles Darwin’s grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, as well as his father, were both Freemasons. The narrative of how Erasmus drafted the initial concept of evolution is detailed in Russell Grigg’s work, “Darwinism – It All Began in the Family.” Erasmus Darwin articulated his evolutionary ideas in his publication “Zoonomia.” He initially posited the hypothesis of evolution in 1770. The Darwin family coat of arms bore three shells and the Latin motto “E Conchis omnia” (“everything from mollusks”), which Erasmus had inscribed on his carriage as a subtle endorsement of his theory.

Evolution of the Quadrobics: Connection to animal "personas" or another aspect of Darwinism 4

In the poem “The Botanic Garden,” Erasmus Darwin posited that life began in the ocean and evolved progressively. His principal work, “Zoonomia, or the Laws of Organic Life” (volumes one and two, published in 1794 and 1796), is an extensive medical prose treatise that includes a thorough classification of diseases and their treatments. Within the following decade, this book was published four times in England and twice in America, and it was translated into German, French, and Italian. It has been described as “the first coherent comprehensive hypothesis of evolution,” appearing approximately 65 years before Charles Darwin’s “On the Origin of Species” in 1859, which detailed his theory of evolution.

To enhance his reputation as a scientist and promote a new scientific brand, Darwin was attributed with various scientific discoveries. Subsequently, for empirical validation of his significant research, Charles embarked on an extensive global voyage aboard the HMS Beagle. While Darwin’s work could have been composed in London, the journey lent considerable scientific credibility to his findings. Prior to the publication of his work, influential supporters were secured, including both members of the Illuminati and their protégés, as well as impartial scientists.

Initially, Charles was reticent and avoided public attention, reluctant to label his (or his grandfather’s) ideas as a “theory,” preferring the term “hypothesis.” However, he gradually assumed the role designated to him. In essence, the figure we discuss is not merely the scientist Charles Darwin, but rather the conceptual entity – the “Charles Darwin” brand.

And if we turn to earlier events in the history of mankind, we will find that according to the teaching of Talmudic Judaism (which grossly distorts Old Testament Judaism), the only people on earth are only its followers, and the rest, the goyim, are subhuman, semi-animals, having a human appearance so that the Jews would not be disgusted with looking at them.

Consequently, alongside the Darwin brand, the “Karl Marx” brand was promoted. Marx, who was the grandson of two rabbis and also known as Mordechai Levy, translated the ancient Jewish aspiration for the terrestrial prosperity of a specific people into the concept of communism. This ideology ultimately promised “from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs,” thus placing the principle of consumption as a primary driving force in the animal kingdom once more at the center stage.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

Consequently, the attendants of the extremely wealthy may appear more refined than their employers, with billionaires donning plastic watches and plain attire, while their chauffeurs and cooks are adorned with branded apparel, timepieces, and jewelry, resembling decorated Christmas trees. The distinction between the upper and lower echelons is not marked by the amount or quality of consumption, but by the nature of their aspirations. The objectives of the elite transcend the material world, while the desires of the less privileged remain grounded in tangible possessions. Their perspective is bound to the earthly realm, unable to elevate towards the divine, as if by a peculiar design of the neck.

Such a structure of society was advocated by the Talmudists. They divided everyone into goyim (animals in human form) and, in fact, people. The distinguishing feature was the goal. People served God. By nature, such a goal is inaccessible to the goyim (just as it is inaccessible to a monkey to think about the meaning of life). The term ‘goy’ was differentiated from ‘man’ by the role it fulfilled. The vision was to structure the world as a pyramid, with human priests at the apex and all the nations positioned beneath them.

The rise of the so-called “quadrobics” phenomenon, where individuals are indoctrinated to embrace their “natural” animal essence, represents another facet of “Darwinism.” This trend is seen as contributing to the development of a class of “service people,” whose sole purpose is to serve those in power. For many modern teenagers, a person is merely one among numerous animal “personas”.

When such comparisons are evaluated without bias, an individual who has delved into history not just chronologically but also in terms of meaning and spirituality, can independently arrive at conclusions that resonate with them on an intuitive level.

Comments

You May Also Like

Conspiracies

Do you believe in a GRAND CONSPIRACY ? Do you believe Oswald acted alone ? Do you believe that government is corrupt ? If...

Advertisement