Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Underworld

Countries have collaborated to develop a credit card that tracks your carbon footprint

Countries have collaborated to develop a credit card that tracks your carbon footprint 1

While we engage in nearly comprehensible absurdities, the planet gradually stalls, indifferent to the protests and dissatisfaction of the “useless cattle.” How will your carbon footprint and carbon wallet function in the world envisioned by the WEF?

Allow us to introduce Barbara Baarsma, the CEO of Rabo Carbon Bank—not to be confused with Rabo Bank. In a video interview, she promotes the concept of a “personal carbon wallet.” While it might appear trivial, her statements are quite alarming and warrant serious concern.

“Let’s make sure that every family or every citizen of the Netherlands gets a certain amount of carbon rights. In this way, we can ensure that emissions do not exceed our annual limit. Your emissions rights will be stored in a carbon wallet. So, if I want to fly, I’ll buy the carbon rights from someone who can’t afford to fly. For example, this poor person can earn extra money in this way.

Or if someone lives in a small house, they can sell their emission rights to someone who lives in a big house. In this way, poor people can benefit from a green economy.”

Indeed, it’s quite the topic. Let’s dissect it gradually and consider the likely implementation methods.

One might view this as merely an additional layer of taxation that will be embraced by globalists. However, we believe it’s more profound. When bankers begin to speak of rights, the impoverished, and the green economy, it’s evident they’re crafting a world tailored for the elite, with little regard for the rest.

In essence, it could mean a future where personal entertainment and travel are luxuries beyond reach. But rest assured, the elite will likely indulge on behalf of all.

Countries have collaborated to develop a credit card that tracks your carbon footprint 2
Carbon Labels on Products.

This is nothing but totalitarianism. We forgot to mention that Rabobank and Baarsma both participate in the World Economic Forum.

When many people consider carbon emissions and carbon footprints, they often associate them solely with travel, fuel, gas, and electricity, viewing these as the primary sources of emissions. However, the reality is far more complex.

Allow us to introduce you to a company you might not be familiar with, called Doconomy.

Doconomy is a credit card endorsed by the World Economic Forum of Klaus Schwab. In May 2019, an article was published on the WEF website with the title: “This credit card has a carbon spending limit.”

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The article says

“Swedish fintech company Doconomy has launched a new credit card that tracks the carbon footprint of its customers and reduces their costs when they reach their carbon maximum.”

Indeed, it reduces their expenses and further:

“The DO card tracks the CO2 emissions associated with purchases to calculate the carbon impact of each transaction. The goal is to encourage people to actively reduce their carbon footprint and demonstrate how small changes can affect the environment.

The map uses the Aland index as a basis for calculating the carbon footprint of each product purchased. Users can set a maximum value for their carbon spend and learn how to offset their carbon footprint by contributing to schemes to reduce or eliminate greenhouse gas emissions.”

We are now approaching a deeper understanding of its functionality. It’s not limited to travel; it will encompass all aspects of life.

In February 2019, Mastercard published an article titled “Mastercard and Doconomy Launch the Future of Green Payments.” The article discusses:

“Doconomy and Mastercard are announcing their joint efforts to combat climate change by creating DO, a free and easy-to-use mobile banking service that allows users to track, understand and reduce their CO2 footprint through carbon offsetting.”

It’s remarkable that they highlight the capability for users to monitor everything. This, they assure, will not be exploited for malicious intents, such as banks and governments tracking all activities. Certainly not. Additionally, Mastercard is a partner with the WEF.

In May 2019, the United Nations engaged in climate action by publishing an article titled “Innovative Climate Action – New Credit Card Limits Users’ Climate Impact.”

Patricia Espinosa, the UN Executive Secretary for Climate Change, was highly impressed with this concept and lauded it extensively. Indeed, Espinosa and the UN are partners with the WEF, which seems to indicate a recurring pattern.

Large banks also perceive this as a significant opportunity. In 2021, Barclays partnered with MasterCard and Doconomy. This collaboration is viewed by some as akin to surveillance and socialism. Additionally, it is well-known that Barclays is a member of the World Economic Forum (WEF).

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

This doesn’t fully capture the scope of what the WEF, Mastercard, the UN, and similar global organizations are orchestrating. You’ve only been exposed to a fraction of the narrative.

Imagine this scenario: In Ireland, Marc Ó Cathasaigh, a Green Party member, visited Brew Dog pub in Dublin earlier this March. He presented a menu image where each item had a CO2 label, prompting the question: Will this influence your choice?

The menu displayed traditional options like chicken, beef, and lamb on one side, and “plant-based” alternatives, including Beyond Meat’s lab-processed options, on the other. Notably, Bill Gates has invested in Beyond Meat.

The disparity in Dublin’s exorbitant prices for these two product types is minimal, yet there is a significant difference in CO2 emissions.

It’s also worth noting that there’s a notion being seeded in the public consciousness regarding varying CO2 levels. Efforts are being made to nudge people towards plant-based foods and Beyond Meat products, clearly indicating an underlying agenda.

The criteria for measuring CO2 emissions are unclear as yet, but restaurants have begun implementing tests. I’ve perused all the comments on this subject; some view it as positive, others disagree. However, the issue is that none of the respondents seem to grasp the core issue.

What’s likely to unfold is this: your carbon footprint may dictate your dining choices at a restaurant. Depending on your remaining points for the month, you might be restricted to either ‘right food’ or ‘lab food.’

It does sound quite peculiar, doesn’t it? The number of points you have could decide whether you’re permitted to consume ‘proper food’ or ‘synthetic food.’

If you were a courageous child, you would be permitted only to consume lab-grown plant-based foods to avoid exceeding your carbon quota. Attempting to order beef with high CO2 levels would be prohibited.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

The same principle applies to your weekly supermarket visits, where each item purchased would have a CO2 value assigned.

Yet, the situation becomes more absurd. In the past month, Eamonn Ryan, a WEF member and leader of the Green Party in Ireland, has proposed a reduction in Irish livestock numbers. Instead, we would import cattle from Brazil. This, we refer to as the “Ruminati” agenda (the work of the “reflective”).

Now, consider the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef imports on the menu. It would skyrocket. Can you perceive their objectives and the potential consequences?

It may seem excessively bleak, but it’s not entirely implausible. Consider the events of the past two and a half years, and you’ll see it’s not as far-fetched as it sounds.

We’ve been shown predictions of how it could unfold. For instance, the Black Mirror episode “Nosedive,” which revolves around social credit points, offers a glimpse into such a future. Imagine substituting the social credit score with a carbon footprint to grasp the concept. In the future, digital identities and currencies, social credit points, and carbon footprints are expected to function together.

Doc Ono provides an illustration of this concept on their website, using clothing as an example. Imagine you’re in the market for a new pair of jeans.

On their website, they claim:

“Consumers can cut their carbon footprint in half by choosing products with a lower impact.”

Picture yourself shopping with a “carbon calculator” and discovering you have only 10 points left. You can’t purchase jeans that cost 21.45 CO2 points; instead, you must choose jeans priced at 8.98 CO2 points. Ultimately, you cannot surpass your quota; if you do, your card will be disabled, and your digital payment will be rejected.

The “carbon calculator” we referred to is actually a real tool developed by Mastercard.

Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.

In a 2021 press release on their website, they report the following:

“Mastercard is introducing a new carbon calculator tool for banks around the world amid growing consumer interest in the environment.”

Guess who’s collaborating with them? Doconomy. It will be implemented as an app so you can check your carbon footprint, which will determine what you can buy and what you can’t.

It’s not merely the traditional “carbon calculator”; it’s the 2030 carbon calculator, aligned with the 2030 Agenda. If you examine the top left corner of the image closely, you’ll notice the progression from 2020 to 2030.

Eventually, it will evolve into an application encompassing the essentials of digital ID, digital currency, social credit score, and more. It’s akin to entering a fusion of Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World” and George Orwell’s “1984.”

However, whether this will materialize is another matter entirely. This isn’t just the ramblings of a conspiracy theorist. I’ve attempted to present evidence of real-world developments. It remains your choice to believe it or not, and to decide if we will allow it to unfold.

Comments

You May Also Like

Advertisement