Former US Senator Curt Weldon has made startling claims, alleging that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) may have deliberately caused cancer in two colleagues who assisted him in investigating potential government links to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Shared during an interview with journalist Tucker Carlson, these allegations have reignited debates about the scope of covert intelligence operations and the potential misuse of advanced technologies.
Weldon, a Republican Congressman from Pennsylvania who served from 1987 to 2007, spoke openly about the suspicious deaths of his two associates. Both individuals, who aided his inquiries into the 9/11 attacks, died from rapidly progressing forms of cancer. Weldon suggested their deaths might not have been coincidental but rather the result of targeted actions by covert operatives.
“They both had rapidly progressing cancer. It’s a typical way that the secret services use when they want to get rid of someone. I can’t prove it, but they both died suddenly,” Weldon stated.
Context of the Allegations: 9/11 Investigations
Weldon’s claims arise from his work investigating the US government’s knowledge and response to the 9/11 attacks. During his tenure, he was a vocal critic of intelligence failures and advocated for greater transparency regarding the events leading up to the tragedy. His investigations focused on the role of intelligence agencies, including the CIA, and their potential connections to individuals or groups involved in the attacks.
The two colleagues mentioned by Weldon were reportedly key in gathering evidence and analyzing data for these inquiries. Their sudden deaths raised suspicions, particularly due to the aggressive nature of their illnesses. While Weldon admitted there is no definitive proof, he pointed to historical precedents and covert tactics used by intelligence agencies to eliminate perceived threats.
Cognitive Warfare and “Havana Syndrome”
In the interview, Weldon elaborated on “cognitive warfare,” a term he used to describe advanced tactics allegedly employed by intelligence agencies to manipulate or harm individuals. He referenced his 1997 testimony before a congressional hearing on asymmetric threats, where he chaired a study committee. Weldon highlighted four key threats at the time:
- Use of drones: Emerging technologies for surveillance and attacks.
- Cyber attacks: Now a well-documented threat to national security.
- Electromagnetic pulse (EMP) bursts: Potential disruptions to critical infrastructure.
- Cognitive warfare: Psychological and physiological manipulation tactics.
Weldon suggested that cognitive warfare techniques, including those linked to what is now known as “Havana syndrome,” may have been used against his colleagues. Havana syndrome refers to unexplained health incidents reported by US diplomats and intelligence officers, with symptoms like headaches, dizziness, and cognitive difficulties. Some experts attribute these to directed energy weapons or microwave technologies.
“Today, our services try to pretend that they don’t know what it is. Because the Russians used it, and the Chinese call it ‘Havana syndrome,’” Weldon remarked, implying that such tactics have been known to intelligence communities for decades.
Historical Precedents and Covert Operations
Weldon’s allegations, while extraordinary, are not without historical context. The CIA has faced accusations of unethical practices in the past, notably the MKUltra program in the mid-20th century, which involved experiments on unwitting subjects to test mind-control techniques. Declassified documents have revealed the agency’s exploration of chemical and biological agents, raising questions about the potential for targeted health manipulation.
Although no concrete evidence supports Weldon’s specific claims, the rapid progression of cancer in his colleagues aligns with speculative theories about the use of carcinogens or radiation as covert weapons. Such methods, if real, would be nearly impossible to trace, making them a plausible tool for eliminating individuals discreetly.
Implications and Public Reaction
Weldon’s statements have sparked heated discussions, particularly on platforms like X, where users debate the plausibility of his claims. Some view the allegations as credible, citing the CIA’s controversial history, while others dismiss them as unsubstantiated conspiracy theories. Weldon’s stature as a former senator lends weight to his assertions, though the lack of evidence remains a significant challenge.
The allegations raise broader questions about the oversight of intelligence agencies and the ethical boundaries of their operations. If true, the use of cancer-inducing technologies would represent a profound violation of human rights and a betrayal of public trust. Even if unproven, the claims underscore the need for greater transparency and accountability within covert institutions.
Alarming and Divisive
Former Senator Curt Weldon’s allegations that the CIA may have induced cancer in his colleagues are both alarming and divisive. While lacking definitive proof, his claims draw attention to the shadowy world of intelligence operations and the potential misuse of advanced technologies. As discussions continue, the public is left to grapple with uncomfortable questions about the lengths to which agencies might go to protect their interests.
Weldon’s story serves as a reminder of the importance of vigilance and accountability in safeguarding democratic principles. Whether his allegations are ultimately substantiated or not, they highlight the enduring tension between national security and individual rights.
