Connect with us

Science & Technology

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Completely Ignores Serious 5G Health Hazards

Last Thursday, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stated that his government is relying on “national security experts” as it “weighs any potential security concerns associated with 5G wireless technology.” Canada is currently contemplating on whether or not to allow Huawei Technologies Co. access to it’s next-generation wireless network. This firm has developed 5G technology as a fifth-generation mobile network that could be 100 times faster than what already exists today. Australia and New Zealand have already banned Huawei from their grids, and other countries like the United Kingdom and Germany are being pressured to follow suit over supposed security concerns that the technology could be used and exploited by foreign countries.

According to the Canadian Broadcast Corporation (CBC):

U.S. wireless providers are trumpeting the virtues of their soon-to-be-unveiled 5G networks, but in Canada, the Big Three telecoms are sitting back and staying mum. Many experts believe it’ll take years for a full rollout of the next-generation wireless technology, which promises to deliver blistering fast download speeds — some say up to 200 times faster than today’s LTE networks — and negligible lag times that will empower driverless car technology, remote-controlled surgeries and other yet-to-be-invented ideas. U.S. telecom competitors are battling for the bragging rights of hitting the market first — even though there’s still no indication that 5G-compatible smartphones will be available before 2019.

We are currently in the rollout, and 5G technology is already here. Many North Americans are already using 5G technology for their internet services inside of their homes, yet nobody seems to be concerned or even knows about the health hazards associated with this type of technology or wireless technology in general.

This is largely because our access to information is controlled by mainstream media, as mainstream media is often the only source of information people use to stay up to date on what’s really going on. So, any issues that aren’t addressed there (and there are many) go unnoticed by and hidden from the collective. The issue is that mainstream media networks are owned by corporations, which is evident given all of the declassified documentation showing this as well as the number of award-winning mainstream media journalists who, in the past several years, have quit their jobs in order to create awareness about mainstream media’s connection to governments, corporations and intelligence agencies. You can read more about that and see the latest example here.

Here is another article that may interest you that goes into mainstream media’s connection to intelligence agencies and academia.

So much information about what is happening on our planet is completely omitted by mainstream media as well as academia, resulting in a population of misinformed professionals and citizenry. We cannot continue to rely on academia nor mainstream media as our only sources of information, and doing so will only further mislead the collective and continue to contribute to the destruction of our health and the planet.

I came across Trudeau’s address regarding 5G technology and their supposed security concerns while I was in the change room of a gym. It was on a T.V. and multiple people were watching the broadcast.

Having worked in this field for a long time, and having observed the amount of shares and site hits that articles regarding 5G technology and wireless radiation in general receive, I feel that many people are ‘awake.’ I thought this would be the case simply given the solidity of the science, it’s unquestionable, but unfortunately, a lot of important science is not really emphasized when it should be. It seems to be completely ignored by mainstream media and represents an area within mainstream academia that needs more attention. 

I continued to watch the broadcast only to be disappointed that nobody was asking Trudeau about the health concerns related to 5G technology, and why it’s presumed safe and has not gone through any safety testing. This is strange since there are literally thousands of peer-reviewed publications that provide great cause for concern.

I proceeded to ask fellow onlookers in the room if they were aware of the health concerns over 5G and one of them responded in a sarcastic tone, saying “what, are tumors going to start growing out of our ears?” Another responded by stating that natural sources of electromagnetic radiation have always been present in our environment and it’s not a concern. My heart instantly dropped as I was reminded of just how misinformed people can be and how something that’s never addressed or brought up on television is usually greeted with disbelief.

There seems to be a common thought that, if it’s important, our federal regulatory agencies would not allow its approval. This is incorrect.

I was even more concerned that the Prime Minister seems to be citing security issues and no health issues at all.

‘National Security’ has been present as long as politics has. It’s a term used to justify and push the populace to accept harsher security measures, stripping us of our rights and freedoms for more ‘protection.’ Not to mention it’s always been used as an excuse to classify boat loads of information to protect corporate interests. Mass surveillance programs are a great example, which were once considered a ‘conspiracy theory’ prior to the Snowden leaks. We saw this with the ‘war on terror,’ one that’s been fabricated as evident by false-flag terrorist attacks in order to justify the infiltration of other  countries as well as mass surveillance programs here at home that infringe on our rights. William Binney, another former high ranking intelligence official with the National Security Agency stated that these programs are not used to protect us, but are for the purpose of “total population control.”

Perhaps 5G and the security issues brought up are no different? We are experiencing a massive wave of Orwellian-type censorship of information, particularly when it comes to the internet. Elitist groups are determining what is ‘real’ and what is ‘fake’ instead of letting the people decide for themselves. For example, the news browser extension NewsGuard promises to help readers pick out fake news. However, NewsGuard is funded and run by individuals tied to the CFR, Atlantic Council and other prominent elite figures. You can read more about that here. It’s the latest example of many, but others include the recent deletion of over 1000 alternative media pages’ social platforms including Alex Jones and The Free Thought Project.

Net Neutrality falls under this same category. Heightened security concerns could impose even more restrictions and censorship on the internet than there already are. A tool of the global elite has always been to manufacture the problem so they can propose the solution, and I believe that’s exactly what’s happening here. They’re creating a false narrative surrounding ‘fake news’ and ‘national security’ in order to justify further control over the population. 

Now Let’s Get To Those Health Concerns

As I mentioned earlier, there are literally thousands of peer-reviewed publications raising multiple health concerns. If you want to access these, the Environmental Health Trust is an excellent place to start.

Did you know that multiple countries around the world have completely banned wireless technology inside of schools and nursery homes due to health concerns? Take France for example. They passed a law in 2015 banning WiFi from all nursery schools. The law states that Wi-Fi must be turned off in all elementary schools when it’s not in use. A wired connection, if possible, is preferred. This could also be a great solution for your home, and a wired connection is much faster than a wireless one.

It’s not just a concern for children. The French National Library along with several other libraries and universities have completely removed all Wi-Fi networks, and it’s also banned in many municipal buildings.

Other countries with similar restrictions include: Belgium, Spain, Israel, Australia, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, India, Finland, Cyprus and more.

The list goes on, and all of them have varying levels and degrees of limitations and bans.

For example, Namibia’s atomic energy review clearly states that current so-called “safety” standards don’t protect citizens from long-term health effects, as the guidelines governing their use do not guarantee adequate protection against the effects of long-term exposure.

So why have we not imposed similar restrictions in North America yet?

This industry is one of many, along with big pharma and big food, that’s plagued by large corporations who completely control our federal regulatory agencies. I recently wrote about the big pharma connection to the government, and presented a video from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on how big pharma completely owns congress. You can check that out here.

Dr. Sharon Goldberg, an internal medicine physician and professor recently gave her testimony regarding the dangers of electromagnetic radiation at Michigan State’s 5G small cell tower hearing.

Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans, we have clear evidence of cancer now: there is no question. We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects… 5G is an untested application of a technology that we know is harmful; we know it from the science. In academics, this is called human subjects research.

You can watch that full testimony here.

In fact, new research shows how the frequencies used in crowd control weapons, ones that physically impact our biology, form the basis of the new 5G network. You can read more about that here.

“If you are one of the millions who seek faster downloads of movies, games and virtual pornography, a solution is at hand, that is, if you do not mind volunteering your living body in a giant uncontrolled experiment on the human population. At this moment, residents of the Washington, DC region – like those of 100 Chinese cities – are about to be living within a vast experimental Millimeter wave network to which they have not consented – all courtesy of American taxpayers” – Dr. Devra Lee Davis,  founding director of the board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, founding director of the Center for Environmental Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, and President of the Environmental Health Trust

In 2015, Dr. Martin Blank led a scientist appeal to the United Nations and the World Health Organization, calling for greater attention to the health risks of EMFs. Currently, there are 240 scientists from 41 nations with published peer-reviewed EMF papers as signatories to the International EMF Scientist Appeal, unified in the opinion that the body of research on EMF bioeffects is not only compelling, but urgent. He has stated:

Putting it bluntly they (EMFs) are damaging the living cells in our bodies and killing many of us prematurely. (source)

Futhermore, Dr. Lee (quoted above) has put together what’s known as the Environmental Health Trust.  There you can find all of the science and more relating to this topic. If you do your research, you will see how our regulatory agencies and these corporations completely bypass this science and simply presume that these technologies are safe.

We see the same thing with our food, pesticides (glyphosate being one of the most popular examples), and more. Our federal regulatory agencies have been completely corrupted and taken over by corporations.

The Takeaway

Don’t be completely alarmed. There are various things you can do to mitigate these effects. At home, you could have a wired connection. You could disconnect your router and other appliances that give off some type of electromagnetic radiation when they are not in use and/or before bed. You could purchase electromagnetic protective clothing and bedding, and you could live a healthy lifestyle with a clean diet and lots of exercise. At the end of the day, it’s nothing to fear, but rather something to be aware of. Don’t put your laptop on your lap, turn off your cell phone when not in use, and never have your cell phone touching your ear. Don’t keep it in your pocket! I am a big believer in the mind-body connection, and if that information resonates with you, it can also be put to good use to mitigate the harmful effects of wireless technology. 

Source link

Advertisement
Comments

Science & Technology

My 400 Days Without Candy & What I Learned About Sugar Addiction

At the end of 2017 I decided to temporarily say goodbye to my dietary Achilles heel.

While I’m certainly not suggesting that I am some beacon of ideal healthy eating, I have always been someone who, for the most part, makes what I’ve found to be healthy choices. Except for my one glaring weakness… candy.

In particular, the really sour and heavily sugar coated kind, but you’d be hard pressed to find me turning down even those better classified as sweet, with all of their sugar fused within the confines of the chew. Cherry Blasters, Sour Patch Kids, Fuzzy Peaches, Sour Punch Straws, you name it, I ate it, and usually with a big smile on my face.

But no matter how much my tastebuds loved this stuff, I’ve always known that it’s not good for me (I can’t imagine that there is anyone out there who actually thinks it is), so I decided to listen to my body, just as I had already done with a number of my other dietary changes. I opted to no longer ignore the stomach and headaches that would often come shortly after my sugary indulgences and give it up.

What started as a one month challenge quickly evolved into a three month challenge, followed by a one year challenge, and then a 400 day challenge simply because I liked the sound of the number. Here’s some of what I learned from this journey:

The First Days Are Undeniably The Hardest

The old adage that it takes approximately 21 days to break a bad habit or make a new one in this case certainly held true. It was right around the 3 week point that I started to find myself far less tempted and far less frequently on the search for something to satisfy my sweet tooth. And believe it or not, the longer I went on, the less appealing the idea of eating candy became. It almost felt as if the memory in my tastebuds that had controlled so many of my past decisions had gradually faded away.

Mindset Is Everything

While I will fully admit that my quest to 400 was helped by it naturally feeding into another one of my “addictions” (a great joy in setting records and tracking analytics), I found that so much of the temptation to consume these sugary, salty and greasy foods really was incredibly temporary. Challenge yourself to at least not let it win once and you’ll likely see just how quickly its strength can fade.

It Paid Dividends

While I didn’t completely cut sugar out of my diet, as many people have so admirably done and documented about, I can say that cutting back even as much as I did felt really good for me. Some may be quick to chalk it up to the placebo effect, and understandably so, but I can honestly say that the above mentioned stomach and head aches occurred far less often over the 400 day span.

Real-Time Analysis: After The First Bite

Having now officially consumed my first piece of candy since 2017, believe it or not, it tastes different. Is it still tasty and did it satisfy me at some level? Absolutely. But it also tastes way more sugary and foreign to my body than it once did. It’s as if my body really wanted to make it clear by saying, “are you sure you want to bring this stuff back into the picture?”

Side Note: For those that are curious, since it’s the most common question I’ve been asked since embarking on this journey, the candy I chose to eat as my first piece was a Vegan Wild Cherry Belt by Squish Candies. (And no I’m not getting paid to brand-drop, and no I don’t make any commission should you choose to buy any at that link… unfortunately LOL).

Where I Go From Here

While I don’t see myself going completely cold turkey on candy again, I also cannot see myself consuming it nearly as much as I once did. And I do so happily, not out of punishment. While I’m also certainly not qualified to be giving out dietary advice, I am comfortable challenging all of you to give up something you know to not be good for you. See how your body feels both without it and after you re-introduce it.

Source link

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

Machine Learning Is Causing A “Crisis in Science”

Crisis In Science

Rice University statistician Genevera Allen issued a grave warning at a prominent scientific conference this week: that scientists are leaning on machine learning algorithms to find patterns in data even when the algorithms are just fixating on noise that won’t be reproduced by another experiment.

“There is general recognition of a reproducibility crisis in science right now,” she told the BBC. “I would venture to argue that a huge part of that does come from the use of machine learning techniques in science.”

Reproducibility

The problem, according to Allen, can arise when scientists collect a large amount of genome data and then use poorly-understood machine learning algorithms to find clusters of similar genomic profiles.

“Often these studies are not found out to be inaccurate until there’s another real big dataset that someone applies these techniques to and says ‘oh my goodness, the results of these two studies don’t overlap,’” she told the BBC.

Noise Project

The problem with machine learning, according to Allen, is that it’s trained to look for patterns even where none exist. The solution, she suspects, will be in next-generation algorithms that are better able to evaluate how reliable the predictions they make are.

“The question is, ‘Can we really trust the discoveries that are currently being made using machine-learning techniques applied to large data sets?’” Allen said in a press release. “The answer in many situations is probably, ‘Not without checking,’ but work is underway on next-generation machine-learning systems that will assess the uncertainty and reproducibility of their predictions.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

Ride out Climate Change in This $5.5 Million Self-Sustaining Yacht

Luxury Living

In 2017 we wrote about Arkup, a company designing “hurricane-proof” livable yachts powered by solar energy and capable of operating completely off the grid.

Now, the company has finally debuted a real-life version of one of its designs, and it could to let you ride out the worst that climate change might throw at the Earth in the near future — assuming you have $5.5 million to spend on it.

Cost of Climate Change

Visitors to the Miami Yacht Show, which runs through Feb. 18, can catch a glimpse of the Arkup #1, a 75-foot livable yacht its creators claim is entirely self-sustaining.

The yacht has a rainwater-harvesting system, a 2,300-square-foot roof covered in solar panels, and would be as “stable as a home on land” if pummeled with Category 4 winds, according to an Arkup press release.

Based on the tweeted photos of the yacht, it’s incredibly luxurious. But given that most of us don’t have $5.5 million to spend on a floating home, we might want to consider cheaper ways to prepare for climate change, like urging our legislators to back climate-friendly legislation.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending