Connect with us

Science & Technology

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau Completely Ignores Serious 5G Health Hazards

Last Thursday, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau stated that his government is relying on “national security experts” as it “weighs any potential security concerns associated with 5G wireless technology.” Canada is currently contemplating on whether or not to allow Huawei Technologies Co. access to it’s next-generation wireless network. This firm has developed 5G technology as a fifth-generation mobile network that could be 100 times faster than what already exists today. Australia and New Zealand have already banned Huawei from their grids, and other countries like the United Kingdom and Germany are being pressured to follow suit over supposed security concerns that the technology could be used and exploited by foreign countries.

According to the Canadian Broadcast Corporation (CBC):

U.S. wireless providers are trumpeting the virtues of their soon-to-be-unveiled 5G networks, but in Canada, the Big Three telecoms are sitting back and staying mum. Many experts believe it’ll take years for a full rollout of the next-generation wireless technology, which promises to deliver blistering fast download speeds — some say up to 200 times faster than today’s LTE networks — and negligible lag times that will empower driverless car technology, remote-controlled surgeries and other yet-to-be-invented ideas. U.S. telecom competitors are battling for the bragging rights of hitting the market first — even though there’s still no indication that 5G-compatible smartphones will be available before 2019.

We are currently in the rollout, and 5G technology is already here. Many North Americans are already using 5G technology for their internet services inside of their homes, yet nobody seems to be concerned or even knows about the health hazards associated with this type of technology or wireless technology in general.

This is largely because our access to information is controlled by mainstream media, as mainstream media is often the only source of information people use to stay up to date on what’s really going on. So, any issues that aren’t addressed there (and there are many) go unnoticed by and hidden from the collective. The issue is that mainstream media networks are owned by corporations, which is evident given all of the declassified documentation showing this as well as the number of award-winning mainstream media journalists who, in the past several years, have quit their jobs in order to create awareness about mainstream media’s connection to governments, corporations and intelligence agencies. You can read more about that and see the latest example here.

Here is another article that may interest you that goes into mainstream media’s connection to intelligence agencies and academia.

So much information about what is happening on our planet is completely omitted by mainstream media as well as academia, resulting in a population of misinformed professionals and citizenry. We cannot continue to rely on academia nor mainstream media as our only sources of information, and doing so will only further mislead the collective and continue to contribute to the destruction of our health and the planet.

I came across Trudeau’s address regarding 5G technology and their supposed security concerns while I was in the change room of a gym. It was on a T.V. and multiple people were watching the broadcast.

Having worked in this field for a long time, and having observed the amount of shares and site hits that articles regarding 5G technology and wireless radiation in general receive, I feel that many people are ‘awake.’ I thought this would be the case simply given the solidity of the science, it’s unquestionable, but unfortunately, a lot of important science is not really emphasized when it should be. It seems to be completely ignored by mainstream media and represents an area within mainstream academia that needs more attention. 

I continued to watch the broadcast only to be disappointed that nobody was asking Trudeau about the health concerns related to 5G technology, and why it’s presumed safe and has not gone through any safety testing. This is strange since there are literally thousands of peer-reviewed publications that provide great cause for concern.

I proceeded to ask fellow onlookers in the room if they were aware of the health concerns over 5G and one of them responded in a sarcastic tone, saying “what, are tumors going to start growing out of our ears?” Another responded by stating that natural sources of electromagnetic radiation have always been present in our environment and it’s not a concern. My heart instantly dropped as I was reminded of just how misinformed people can be and how something that’s never addressed or brought up on television is usually greeted with disbelief.

There seems to be a common thought that, if it’s important, our federal regulatory agencies would not allow its approval. This is incorrect.

I was even more concerned that the Prime Minister seems to be citing security issues and no health issues at all.

‘National Security’ has been present as long as politics has. It’s a term used to justify and push the populace to accept harsher security measures, stripping us of our rights and freedoms for more ‘protection.’ Not to mention it’s always been used as an excuse to classify boat loads of information to protect corporate interests. Mass surveillance programs are a great example, which were once considered a ‘conspiracy theory’ prior to the Snowden leaks. We saw this with the ‘war on terror,’ one that’s been fabricated as evident by false-flag terrorist attacks in order to justify the infiltration of other  countries as well as mass surveillance programs here at home that infringe on our rights. William Binney, another former high ranking intelligence official with the National Security Agency stated that these programs are not used to protect us, but are for the purpose of “total population control.”

Perhaps 5G and the security issues brought up are no different? We are experiencing a massive wave of Orwellian-type censorship of information, particularly when it comes to the internet. Elitist groups are determining what is ‘real’ and what is ‘fake’ instead of letting the people decide for themselves. For example, the news browser extension NewsGuard promises to help readers pick out fake news. However, NewsGuard is funded and run by individuals tied to the CFR, Atlantic Council and other prominent elite figures. You can read more about that here. It’s the latest example of many, but others include the recent deletion of over 1000 alternative media pages’ social platforms including Alex Jones and The Free Thought Project.

Net Neutrality falls under this same category. Heightened security concerns could impose even more restrictions and censorship on the internet than there already are. A tool of the global elite has always been to manufacture the problem so they can propose the solution, and I believe that’s exactly what’s happening here. They’re creating a false narrative surrounding ‘fake news’ and ‘national security’ in order to justify further control over the population. 

Now Let’s Get To Those Health Concerns

As I mentioned earlier, there are literally thousands of peer-reviewed publications raising multiple health concerns. If you want to access these, the Environmental Health Trust is an excellent place to start.

Did you know that multiple countries around the world have completely banned wireless technology inside of schools and nursery homes due to health concerns? Take France for example. They passed a law in 2015 banning WiFi from all nursery schools. The law states that Wi-Fi must be turned off in all elementary schools when it’s not in use. A wired connection, if possible, is preferred. This could also be a great solution for your home, and a wired connection is much faster than a wireless one.

It’s not just a concern for children. The French National Library along with several other libraries and universities have completely removed all Wi-Fi networks, and it’s also banned in many municipal buildings.

Other countries with similar restrictions include: Belgium, Spain, Israel, Australia, Italy, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, India, Finland, Cyprus and more.

The list goes on, and all of them have varying levels and degrees of limitations and bans.

For example, Namibia’s atomic energy review clearly states that current so-called “safety” standards don’t protect citizens from long-term health effects, as the guidelines governing their use do not guarantee adequate protection against the effects of long-term exposure.

So why have we not imposed similar restrictions in North America yet?

This industry is one of many, along with big pharma and big food, that’s plagued by large corporations who completely control our federal regulatory agencies. I recently wrote about the big pharma connection to the government, and presented a video from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on how big pharma completely owns congress. You can check that out here.

Dr. Sharon Goldberg, an internal medicine physician and professor recently gave her testimony regarding the dangers of electromagnetic radiation at Michigan State’s 5G small cell tower hearing.

Wireless radiation has biological effects. Period. This is no longer a subject for debate when you look at PubMed and the peer-review literature. These effects are seen in all life forms; plants, animals, insects, microbes. In humans, we have clear evidence of cancer now: there is no question. We have evidence of DNA damage, cardiomyopathy, which is the precursor of congestive heart failure, neuropsychiatric effects… 5G is an untested application of a technology that we know is harmful; we know it from the science. In academics, this is called human subjects research.

You can watch that full testimony here.

In fact, new research shows how the frequencies used in crowd control weapons, ones that physically impact our biology, form the basis of the new 5G network. You can read more about that here.

“If you are one of the millions who seek faster downloads of movies, games and virtual pornography, a solution is at hand, that is, if you do not mind volunteering your living body in a giant uncontrolled experiment on the human population. At this moment, residents of the Washington, DC region – like those of 100 Chinese cities – are about to be living within a vast experimental Millimeter wave network to which they have not consented – all courtesy of American taxpayers” – Dr. Devra Lee Davis,  founding director of the board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology of the U.S. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, founding director of the Center for Environmental Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, and President of the Environmental Health Trust

In 2015, Dr. Martin Blank led a scientist appeal to the United Nations and the World Health Organization, calling for greater attention to the health risks of EMFs. Currently, there are 240 scientists from 41 nations with published peer-reviewed EMF papers as signatories to the International EMF Scientist Appeal, unified in the opinion that the body of research on EMF bioeffects is not only compelling, but urgent. He has stated:

Putting it bluntly they (EMFs) are damaging the living cells in our bodies and killing many of us prematurely. (source)

Futhermore, Dr. Lee (quoted above) has put together what’s known as the Environmental Health Trust.  There you can find all of the science and more relating to this topic. If you do your research, you will see how our regulatory agencies and these corporations completely bypass this science and simply presume that these technologies are safe.

We see the same thing with our food, pesticides (glyphosate being one of the most popular examples), and more. Our federal regulatory agencies have been completely corrupted and taken over by corporations.

The Takeaway

Don’t be completely alarmed. There are various things you can do to mitigate these effects. At home, you could have a wired connection. You could disconnect your router and other appliances that give off some type of electromagnetic radiation when they are not in use and/or before bed. You could purchase electromagnetic protective clothing and bedding, and you could live a healthy lifestyle with a clean diet and lots of exercise. At the end of the day, it’s nothing to fear, but rather something to be aware of. Don’t put your laptop on your lap, turn off your cell phone when not in use, and never have your cell phone touching your ear. Don’t keep it in your pocket! I am a big believer in the mind-body connection, and if that information resonates with you, it can also be put to good use to mitigate the harmful effects of wireless technology. 

Source link

Comments

Science & Technology

The City of Oakland Votes to Ban Facial Recognition

Opt Out

On Tuesday night, the city council of Oakland, California voted to ban the municipal use of facial recognition technology within its borders.

That makes Oakland the third U.S. city to ban the high-tech surveillance tool and the second to do so in the Bay Area, according to CNET. San Francisco, California banned facial recognition in May and Somerville, Massachusetts followed suit in June. It’s a trend that shows that the people of Silicon Valley are increasingly uncomfortable with the creepy tech developed right in their own neighborhood.

Unproven Tech

Rebecca Kaplan, president of Oakland’s city council, argued that facial recognition technology was neither sophisticated enough nor properly regulated to be placed in the hands of police and other law enforcement agencies, per CNET. She also cited how the technology has been used to target minorities and other vulnerable populations.

Oakland police pushed back against the proposed ban, arguing for a watered-down version that would still allow some applications of the technology, according to CBS SF. But the city council went with the original, more restrictive version.

Technically, a final vote with the Oakland City Council is scheduled for September 17, but given how this first vote passed unanimously, it seems likely that the full ban will go into effect.

READ MORE: Facial recognition banned in another city [CNET]

Source link

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

The first photograph of quantum entanglement has been captured

One of the most enigmatic and fundamental phenomena of nature quantum entanglement has been portrayed for the first time.

quantum entanglement

The phenomenon was a headache for Albert Einstein himself, who characterized it as a “spooky action” because it violated the universe as we know it. It is called quantum entanglement and it happens when two particles separated from each other by a monstrous distance are able to communicate and interact without there being anything, no transmission channel, between the two. This means that if the state of one is altered, the other particle, perhaps millions of kilometers away, will respond in the same way.

Now, a team of physicists from the University of Glasgow has managed to obtain the first visual evidence of this puzzle of quantum mechanics. To do this they created a system that triggers a stream of interlaced photons from a quantum light source to non-conventional objects; which at the same time is reflected in liquid crystal materials that change phase when the photons pass through them.

quantum entanglement

“The image we have managed to capture is an elegant demonstration of a fundamental property of nature, observable for the first time in the form of an image,” explained Dr. Paul-Antoine Moreau, head of the research, in the published study.

quantum entanglement

“It’s an exciting result that could lead to new advances in the emerging field of quantum computing,” he concluded.

Source: BBC.

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

Tesla Announces Electric Pick-Up Truck That Will Cost Under $50,000

Billionaire genius Elon Musk has caught the world’s attention yet again, with a new announcement from Tesla. The electric car company will soon be releasing an electric pickup truck. Tesla CEO Elon Musk spoke about the forthcoming truck in a recent appearance for the “Ride the Lightning” Podcast.

“Will be a better truck than an F-150 in terms of truck-like functionality, and be a better sports car than a standard [Porsche] 911. That’s the aspiration,” Musk said.

The price is also far lower than what most people would expect from Tesla. Musk says that the starting price for the vehicle will be less than $50,000. The vehicle might even end up being cheaper than some F-150 models, considering that they can range anywhere from $28,000 to over $67,000.

Tesla’s new pick up truck will also be cheaper than the other electric truck that is set to appear on the market soon, the $69,000 pick up that is being released by Rivian next year.

“It just can’t be unaffordable,” Musk says.

According to Tesla, the new pickup truck will be similar to the Ford F-150, which is the country’s top rated truck and one of the best selling vehicles in the country for decades. As usual, Musk’s critics believe that he is trying to accomplish the impossible, and even supporters of Tesla are still skeptical.

Brett Smith, the director of propulsion technologies and energy infrastructure at the Center for Automotive Research, told CNBC that it “will be very challenging,” for Musk to meet all of his goals in this project.

“I have no doubt that they can build a pickup truck that has much better handling than the current F-150,” Smith says. However, he also cautions that “You’re never going to get a vehicle that can do everything well.”

Smith and other experts fear that the truck may fall short in its ability to handle off road driving and heavy cargo hauls as well as a traditional pick up truck would, especially with the high performance sports car capabilities of a Porsche 911.

“The physics don’t work there… But can it be a really great-performing, road-driving vehicle? Sure,” Smith said.

Tesla Announces Electric Pick-Up Truck That Will Cost Under $50,000 1

A rendering of the forthcoming Tesla pick up truck, which will reportedly cost less than $50,000. Photo Credit: Tesla

“Tesla has proven time and time again that they can do some really great things with products, and they’ve proven again that it can be hard to deliver on some things. So, I think what he said was a good benchmark to shoot for, [but] the reality is probably going to be much different,” he added.

Tesla also has a semi-truck on the way as well. The company expects that the truck will have a 500 mile (805 km) range on a full charge. These vehicles are expected to have a price range of anywhere between $150,000 and $180,000.

On March 7, 2018, Musk announced that the Semi was being tested with real cargo, hauling battery packs from Nevada to California.

The first pre-orders came in the day of the press conference and in the Tesla earnings call for the first quarter of 2018, Musk said that there were about 2,000 total pre-orders of the Semi.

Tesla Announces Electric Pick-Up Truck That Will Cost Under $50,000 2

Tesla CEO Elon Musk speaks during the unveiling of the new Tesla Model Y in Hawthorne, California on March 14, 2019. Photo Credit: Frederic J. Brown, AFP, Getty Images

As with the recent pick up truck reveal, critics of the semi truck argued that it would be extremely difficult, if not impossible for an electric vehicle to handle the kind of long haling of heavy materials that traditional semi trucks can. However, Musk has surprised his critics before, and it seems like these products are very close to reaching the market.

Numerous other companies are also developing electric trucks that will be competing with Tesla for market share. These companies include BYD Company, Cummins, Daimler AG, Einride, Kenworth, Nikola Motor, Proterra, Inc., Xos Trucks, VDL, Daf trucks, Toyota, Uber, and Volkswagen.

Last year, Musk posted a series of Tweets pointing out how media organizations have an obvious incentive to give bad press to electric cars and alternative energy in general.

Musk was unforgiving towards the mainstream media in his epic Twitter rant, calling them hypocrites and saying that the public no longer trusts them. He said that he doesn’t advertise for Tesla, his electric car company, which means that he contributes no money to the media, who depend on advertising dollars to stay in business.

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending