Connect with us

Fact or fiction

Astonishing Irregularities That Are Evidence of a Hollow Moon Space Station

The majestic natural satellite has been the source of curiosity of countless people. It brightens up our dark nights and provides a way to navigate for our ancestral fathers.

But over the years, as our understanding of the space has increased, we found some astonishing information about the moon that led to more questions than answers.

 

Is the moon actually Earth’s natural satellite? 

The new information has led to speculation that it might actually be an extraterrestrial technology transported here to survey mankind’s progress and the impact we have on planet Earth, or maybe something entirely different.

The reason why the moon was brought here remains to be a huge source of speculation, something we will hopefully find out in the near future, but for now we have the following information that dispels the previous notion that it is a natural planetary body:

1. The Moon Predates the Earth

It was initially believed that the moon was formed when an external body crash-landed on Earth. A part of the debris from the crash accumulated into what we now know as the moon.

There is yet another theory stating that when Earth was formed, the remaining dust came together to form a heavenly body that revolves around the Earth.

However, when surface materials from the moon were brought back to Earth by the astronomers, the results led to startling discoveries, as the moon rocks and dust predated our planet, which is around 4.53 billion years old.

The material comprising the moon turned out to be around 5.3 billion years old and the dust even older, dating to about 6.3 billion years.

Hence, the moon must have originated somewhere else.

2. The Moon’s Density

we know for a fact that the Earth’s density is 5.5 gm/cm3. Surprisingly, the moon’s density was found to be 3.34 gm/cm3, around 3.34 times the density of an equal volume of water.
This was explained by the renowned NASA scientist, Dr. Gordon Macdonald in 1962. He stated that if our astronomical data is to be deduced, we come to the conclusion that the interior of the natural satellite is hollow.

3. Moonquakes

A few years after Dr. Gordon Macdonald’s theory came to be, in 1969, the team of Apollo 12 landed on the moon. During their decent, they landed in a rough manner onto the moon’s surface, around 40 miles from their intended destination.

The crash resulted in an artificial moonquake, which had startling characteristics. Upon impact, the moon started to reverberate just like a bell would, which we all know is hollow.

The reverberations lasted for more than an hour. The same phenomenon was again witnessed when Apollo 13 landed on the moon and its impact caused an even greater seismic activity, which lasted for more than three hours.

This led to the conclusion that the moon is unnaturally light for its size and possibly doesn’t even have a core, which would otherwise significantly increase its weight.

4. An Unnaturally Perfect Orbit

we all know that the moon orbits around our planet in an almost perfect circular orbit, but still technically elliptical.

This unnatural orbit couldn’t have been captured by Earth’s gravitational force, as we can clearly see in the substantially elliptical orbits of the other satellites in our solar system.

This further fuels the speculations that the moon was placed in its current position and orbit by an intelligent mind.

5. A Stationary Orbit

Another weird thing about our moon is that its orbit around the Earth is completely stationary. Meaning that it doesn’t spin on its own axis as all of the other moons in our solar system do.

This is why every time we look up at the moon, we see the same side of it — the side that faces Earth.

6. Unexplainable Center of Mass and Geometric Center

Another thing about the moon we have been unable to scientifically understand is the discrepancy in its center of mass, which is around 6,000 feet closer to our planet than its geometric center.

This discrepancy should, according to our understanding, cause the moon to constantly wobble — yet, it remains steady.

Conclusion

since we have discovered all of these discrepancies with the moon, we have been constantly trying to figure out how it maintains its uniquely circular orbit, without a spinning axis and without wobbling.

However, despite all of our efforts to understand these anomalies, we have yet to come up with a conclusive answer.

The hypothesis that highly advanced extraterrestrials have hollowed out the moon and placed it in an almost perfect orbit around our planet, gives birth to even more wild speculations.

We know for a fact that the moon is primarily responsible for the tides, seasons and even some earthquakes. The moon is also known to influence our sleep and even our mood.

So we can draw the conclusion that the aliens that brought it here knew exactly what they were doing and it was part of their agenda to influence life on Earth via the moon space station.

It has also been speculated that Earth is now a prison planet and the moon a space station for alien guardians. Even more interestingly, author David Icke has speculated that the moon is an important part of the matrix deception that kept mankind enslaved for millennia.

Source

Fact or fiction

Can aliens survive climate change? Read on

Are humans the only civilization that face climate change? A look at aliens and climate change, the ‘carbon bubble’ that could collapse the global economy, India’s plastics ban, and the surprisingly environmentally-friendly behaviours of climate change skeptics. Its What’s Up in Climate Change.

Can aliens survive climate change?

Is sustainability ever a possibility for civilizations that use natural resources? Some scientists question if our current climate change predicament is unique to human beings or simply inevitable for any type of life form that intensively harvests natural resources using technology, such as farming practices, to develop civilizations.


Scientists wonder if life forms other than humans can harvest energy without causing climate change that destroy the civilization.

Previous astrobiological studies have indicated the possibility that other planets in the universe can support energy-harvesting species, such as Kepler-62f and Kepler-62e, however there is currently no available data indicating the existence of such exo-civilizations, or more commonly ‘aliens’.

To further understand the human-induced climate change on Earth, a recent study from the University of Rochester investigated if aliens are capable of living sustainably without compromising the health of their environment, or if population growth and the use of natural resources will result in catastrophic climate change that would wipe out the entire civilization.

The evolution of a civilization’s population growth and use of natural resources was modelled with feedback relationships and demonstrated four potential outcomes:

1) Sustainability – a stable balance between population growth and environmental health – population gradually rises and the use of natural resources minimally fluctuates and reaches a consistent level that can support a large population.
2) Oscillation – population and natural resource use fluctuates to highs and lows while maintaining a stable relationship.
3) Die-off – population grows so dramatically that it exceeds the environment’s capacity to provide natural resources and space, and there is significant fluctuation in population and natural resources. The population peaks and then declines as the environment reaches a new stable state.
4) Collapse – population skyrockets and there is no stable relationship between population growth and natural resource use. Population rapidly declines as natural resource use peaks, and collapse occurs even after attempts to reduce population growth and usage of natural resources.

While there is a possibility for alien civilizations to live sustainability, this study forces us to ask ourselves – what will the outcome for humans be?

The ‘carbon bubble’ could collapse the global economy

The good news is that one day low-carbon technologies will power the world, the bad news is that it will crash the global economy in the process, according to a new study.

Global economic growth has created such a high demand in fossil fuels that companies’ assets in fossil fuels are overvalued and have created a ‘carbon bubble’ – a sudden drop in fossil fuel demand could leave companies with trillions of dollars in stranded assets and unable to make profit from these investments, which could collapse the global economy and trigger a financial crisis similar to the Great Recession of 2008.


Researchers predict that the world will slowly transition to low-carbon energies, a transition that puts the fossil fuel industry at risk. Credit: Gerry Machen

The bubble is expected to burst by 2035 according researchers from the University of Cambridge who predict the world will transition to low-carbon economies as renewable energies become cheaper and more efficient. The study shows that this transition will occur even if there are no additional international climate change policies or additional efforts to follow the Paris Agreement’s goal of keeping warming below 2 degrees Celsius.

There are clear winners and losers in this transition – oil producing countries like Russia, Canada (the new owner of an oil pipeline that will cost at least $4.5 billion CND), and the United States could lose their entire oil and gas industries, countries with limited exposure to fossil fuel exposure will benefit, including Germany, and the European Union. The study explains that resisting a renewable energy transition and continuing to invest in a fossil fuel economy will cause even more economic loss as the value of fossil fuels will drop so low production will not be affordable as assets become stranded.

A renewable energy transition would result in a global wealth loss of $1-4 trillion USD and the consequences of an economic collapse can be managed by nations divesting from fossil fuels as an ‘insurance policy’ against the decisions of the rest of the world.

India will ban all single-use plastics by 2022

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently announced that India will ban all plastic in the country by 2022 and the state of Tamil Nadu will ban plastic by 2019 – with exclusions for plastic packages for essential items like medicines and oil. The environmental impact of banning single-use plastic is expected to be huge – by 2050 India is projected to have the largest population of 1.6 billion people who won’t be using disposable plastics.


Plastic pollution on a beach in Mumbai, India. Credit: Ravi Khemka

The national plastic ban announcement came on June 5 as India was hosting the United Nations World Environment Day with ‘Beat Plastic Pollution’ as this year’s main theme. India has struggled with a number of environmental issues – air pollution is extreme that breathing in New Delhi is like smoking 50 cigarettes a day and extensive garbage pollution in cities.

Plastic pollution, particularly in oceans, is a trending topic in conversations about environmental protection and climate change. Bangladesh banned plastic bags after a flood was caused by littered plastic bags that clogged the capital city’s drainage system during a moderate rainfall and Prime Minister Theresa May has ambitiously committed to eliminating all avoidable plastic waste in the United Kingdom by 2042.

Do climate skeptics act the most environmentally-friendly?

Individuals that believe in climate change might not be the ones that act the most sustainably, according to a new year-long study that measured Americans climate change beliefs and their engagement in pro-environmental behaviours, such as recycling.


Pro-environmental actions, such as recycling, can be a result of societal norms, individual values, and government programs. Credit: Mr.TinDC

These researchers wanted to know how belief in climate change affects pro-environmental behaviours and found that climate change skeptics were more likely to report their participation in pro-environmental behaviours, and those with high belief in climate change were more concerned with federal climate change policies.

Previous research provides different insights as to why some people do not engage in pro-environmental behaviours – some outright deny that climate change is occurring whereas others that do believe in climate change are reluctant to take action because of perceptions that it is not an urgent threat.

The researchers were unable to conclude why the skeptics reported more pro-environmental behaviours as they did not report greater identify fit with environmentalism or endorse individual action to reduce climate change. Possible explanations for the surprising outcome is that pro-environmental behaviours could be conducted to address issues like waste instead of the broad topic of climate change or pro-environmental behaviours might be considered a ‘moral issue’ instead of a climate change issue.

Source www.theweathernetwork.com

 

Continue Reading

Fact or fiction

Was This A “Cloaked” Triangle Craft Over Kansas City, Missouri? 

On Aug 8, 2018 the witness was driving south (east) on I-35 just outside of Kansas City, Missouri at 6 pm. It was a cloudy day so he was checking out the formations when he noticed a darker triangular shape, just, hanging out.

So he pulled out his phone and recorded what he could. The triangle stayed there from what he observed to be at least 3 minutes. That time span being from when he noticed it until he eventually got off the highway and headed north to then be obscured by the tree lines.

The witness states: What do I think it is? Well ether some sort of physical vessel that is “cloaked” and is interacting with the atmosphere to still show form. Or something that was big triangle shape that had passed through the clouds leaving a “trail” Or “foot print”.

Triangle Craft Kansas City

ufosightingshotspot.blogspot.com

Continue Reading

Fact or fiction

Is Russia Hiding An Underwater Extraterrestrial Civilization?

According to a very controversial theory during the era of the Soviet Union, there was a peculiar submarine activity in Russia that involved a hidden underwater extraterrestrial civilization.

Apparently, the Russian officials decided to keep these issues as a top-secret. However, two researchers, Paul Stonehill and Phillip Mantle have determined to put two and two together and finally resolve the mystery.

As a subject of their inquiry, these two researchers took the secrecy that revolves around an underwater extraterrestrial civilization that was allegedly confirmed by a large number of witnesses.

Stonehill and Mantle connected the peculiar events to some passenger aircraft produced by underwater UFO movements.

Then again, eyewitnesses have reported seeing unusual creatures and objects in the sea.

Among the most fascinating accounts is the one of Major General V. Demyanenko, a Russian navy commander. According to him, he and his divers detected a type of humanoid aliens who were famous as the ‘swimmers’.

Supposedly, these three-meters-high beings appeared from an underwater tunnel in the Russian territory of Siberia. They also had silver uniforms and round helmets.

Despite the attempts of capturing one of the creatures, the divers failed because all of the creatures protected themselves with a very strong power.

The two researchers also investigated the story of the head of the intelligence department of Russia on a fleet of the Pacific. Namely, Admiral Domislovsky reported seeing a 900 meters long object in the ocean.

Stonehill and Mantle further investigated many reports by other ex-military commanders. All of them involved an alleged underwater extraterrestrial civilization within the infamous Bermuda Triangle.

Mantle stated this is not the first time he has heard stories about a supernatural activity surrounding the Atlantic Ocean.

However, the theory which explains the weird occurrences around the Bermuda Triangle is often dismissed by the official domain. Why? We still don’t know.

Watch the video below:

Continue Reading

Trending