Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Bizzare & Odd

Almost Everything In ‘Dr. Strangelove’ Was True

Almost Everything In ‘Dr. Strangelove’ Was True 1

Remember Eric Schlosser, the Fast Food Nation author? Well he’s also a great journalist and this week in The New Yorker he takes a look at the command and control of nuclear weapons, positing that the nuclear craziness of the classic Peter Sellers movie Dr. Strangelove, Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb was actually pretty much true:

This month marks the fiftieth anniversary of Stanley Kubrick’s black comedy about nuclear weapons, “Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb.” Released on January 29, 1964, the film caused a good deal of controversy. Its plot suggested that a mentally deranged American general could order a nuclear attack on the Soviet Union, without consulting the President. One reviewer described the film as “dangerous … an evil thing about an evil thing.” Another compared it to Soviet propaganda. Although “Strangelove” was clearly a farce, with the comedian Peter Sellers playing three roles, it was criticized for being implausible. An expert at the Institute for Strategic Studies called the events in the film “impossible on a dozen counts.” A former Deputy Secretary of Defense dismissed the idea that someone could authorize the use of a nuclear weapon without the President’s approval: “Nothing, in fact, could be further from the truth.” (See a compendium of clips from the film.) When “Fail-Safe”—a Hollywood thriller with a similar plot, directed by Sidney Lumet—opened, later that year, it was criticized in much the same way. “The incidents in ‘Fail-Safe’ are deliberate lies!” General Curtis LeMay, the Air Force chief of staff, said. “Nothing like that could happen.” The first casualty of every war is the truth—and the Cold War was no exception to that dictum. Half a century after Kubrick’s mad general, Jack D. Ripper, launched a nuclear strike on the Soviets to defend the purity of “our precious bodily fluids” from Communist subversion, we now know that American officers did indeed have the ability to start a Third World War on their own. And despite the introduction of rigorous safeguards in the years since then, the risk of an accidental or unauthorized nuclear detonation hasn’t been completely eliminated.

The command and control of nuclear weapons has long been plagued by an “always/never” dilemma. The administrative and technological systems that are necessary to insure that nuclear weapons are always available for use in wartime may be quite different from those necessary to guarantee that such weapons can never be used, without proper authorization, in peacetime. During the nineteen-fifties and sixties, the “always” in American war planning was given far greater precedence than the “never.” Through two terms in office, beginning in 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower struggled with this dilemma. He wanted to retain Presidential control of nuclear weapons while defending America and its allies from attack. But, in a crisis, those two goals might prove contradictory, raising all sorts of difficult questions. What if Soviet bombers were en route to the United States but the President somehow couldn’t be reached? What if Soviet tanks were rolling into West Germany but a communications breakdown prevented NATOofficers from contacting the White House? What if the President were killed during a surprise attack on Washington, D.C., along with the rest of the nation’s civilian leadership? Who would order a nuclear retaliation then?…

Comments

You May Also Like

Apocalypse & Armageddon

Some very strange and very serious changes in global politics in the last couple of years have been prequel to a world war that...

Apocalypse & Armageddon

Many people today are in painful thoughts about their future, which is directly related to the results of the war in Ukraine, and listen...

Fact or fiction

In general, the prospect for world peace in 2022 is not bright, so the potential use of WMD is being discussed not only by...

Apocalypse & Armageddon

Human civilization has been kind of “lucky” since the advent of nuclear weapons but the doomsday clock can be stopped before the fight starts....

Apocalypse & Armageddon

There are many scenarios for our future. Unfortunately, today we are forced to consider even the worst scenarios, including the outbreak of a nuclear war. How...

Underworld

NATO is conducting an annual exercise called Steadfast Noon, which began on October 18, during which a nuclear war scenario will be tested. They are...

Apocalypse & Armageddon

Post-nuclear climate change will threaten global food supplies and human health. Such conclusions were made by scientists from Rutgers University. The research results are published in the Journal...

Apocalypse & Armageddon

The head of the Strategic Command of the US Armed Forces (AF), Admiral Charles Richard, assessed the possibility of a nuclear war with Russia...

Advertisement