Connect with us

Aliens & UFO's

Alien Abduction: Hoax or Reality?

The terms alien abduction or abduction phenomenon describe “subjectively real memories of being taken secretly against one’s will by apparently nonhuman entities and subjected to complex physical and psychological procedures”. People claiming to have been abducted are usually called “abductees” or “experiencers”. Typical claims involve being subjected to a forced medical examination that emphasizes their reproductive system. Abductees sometimes claim to have been warned against environmental abuse and the dangers of nuclear weapons. While many of these claimed encounters are described as terrifying, some have been viewed as pleasurable or transformative.

 Due to a lack of any substantial physical evidence, most scientists and mental health professionals dismiss the phenomenonas “deception, suggestibility (fantasy-proneness, hypnotizability, false-memory syndrome), personality, sleep phenomena, psychopathology, psychodynamics [and] environmental factors”. Skeptic Robert Sheaffer also sees similarity between the aliens depicted in early science fiction films, in particular, Invaders From Mars, and those reported to have actually abducted people.The first alien abduction claim to be widely publicized was the Betty and Barney Hill abduction in 1961. Reports of the abduction phenomenon have been made around the world, but are most common in English speaking countries, especially the United States. The contents of the abduction narrative often seem to vary with the home culture of the alleged abductee.

Alien abductions have been the subject of conspiracy theories and science fiction storylines (notably The X-Files) that have speculated on stealth technology required if the phenomenon were real, the motivations for secrecy, and that alien implants could be a possible form of physical evidence.

Mainstream scientists reject claims that the phenomenon literally occurs as reported. However, there is little doubt that many apparently stable persons who report alien abductions believe their experiences were real.[8] As reported in the Harvard University Gazette in 1992, Dr. John Edward Mack investigated over 800 claimed abductees and “spent countless therapeutic hours with these individuals only to find that what struck him was the ‘ordinariness’ of the population, including a restaurant owner, several secretaries, a prison guard, college students, a university administrator, and several homemakers … ‘The majority of abductees do not appear to be deluded, confabulating, lying, self-dramatizing, or suffering from a clear mental illness,’ he maintained.” “While psychopathology is indicated in some isolated alien abduction cases,” Stanley Krippner et al. confirmed, “assessment by both clinical examination and standardized tests has shown that, as a group, abduction experients are not different from the general population in term of psychopathology prevalence.” Other experts who have argued that abductees’ mental health is no better or worse than average include psychologists John Wilson and Rima Laibow, and psychotherapist David Gotlib. Some abduction reports are quite detailed. An entire subculture has developed around the subject, with support groups and a detailed mythos explaining the reasons for abductions: The various aliens (Greys, Reptilians, “Nordics” and so on) are said to have specific roles, origins, and motivations. Abduction claimants do not always attempt to explain the phenomenon, but some take independent research interest in it themselves and explain the lack of greater awareness of alien abduction as the result of either extraterrestrial or governmental interest in cover-up.

[…]

Although different cases vary in detail (sometimes significantly), some UFO researchers, such as folklorist Thomas E. Bullard argue that there is a broad, fairly consistent sequence and description of events that make up the typical “close encounter of the fourth kind” (a popular but unofficial designation building on Dr. J. Allen Hynek’s classifying terminology). Though the features outlined below are often reported, there is some disagreement as to exactly how often they actually occur. Bullard argues most abduction accounts feature the following events. They generally follow the sequence noted below, though not all abductions feature all the events:

  1. Capture. The abductee is forcibly taken from terrestrial surroundings to an apparent alien space craft.
  2. Examination and Procedures. Invasive physiological and psychological procedures, and on occasion simulated behavioral situations, training & testing, or sexual liaisons.
  3. Conference. The abductors communicate with the abductee or direct them to interact with specific individuals for some purpose.
  4. Tour. The abductees are given a tour of their captors’ vessel, though this is disputed by some researchers who consider this definition a confabulation of intent when just apparently being taken around to multiple places inside the ship.
  5. Loss of Time. Abductees often rapidly forget the majority of their experience, either as a result of fear, medical intervention, or both.
  6. Return. The abductees are returned to earth, occasionally in a different location from where they were allegedly taken or with new injuries or disheveled clothing.
  7. Theophany. Coinciding with their immediate return, abductee may have a profound sense of love, a high, or “mystical experience”, accompanied by a feeling of oneness with God, the universe, or their abductors. Whether this is the result of a metaphysical change, Stockholm Syndrome, or prior medical tampering is often not scrutinized by the abductees at the time.
  8. Aftermath. The abductee must cope with the psychological, physical, and social effects of the experience.

When describing the “abduction scenario”, David M. Jacobs says:

The entire abduction event is precisely orchestrated. All the procedures are predetermined. There is no standing around and deciding what to do next. The beings are task-oriented and there is no indication whatsoever that we have been able to find of any aspect of their lives outside of performing the abduction procedures.

Source: Wikipedia

Alien Abduction: The McPherson Tape (1998)

A simple investigation into a power blackout leads the McPherson family to witness and capture footage of actual Aliens. When the creatures pursue the McPherson’s back to their home, all hell breaks loose.

I don’t know if you know about this tape, it’s old story with much obscurity, some say it’s true some say it’s fake, there’s even this guy called Dean Alioto that said he made original tape and later made remake. I was thinking about this story for a while and didn’t know where to put it. Maybe it’s only acting , maybe it’s not but something smells here!

Here is the later remake:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mUgRCPKP1jg

You can see that this video is something like Blair witch project!

This is what Wikipedia says about it:

Quote

The McPherson Tape is a docudrama originally directed by Dean Alioto, and later re-made with a larger budget into Alien Abduction: Incident in Lake County. Both videos claim to be the final recordings and last-known whereabouts of a family just before they are abducted by aliens. However, the “McPherson scandal” later revealed that actors had been paid and that the films were a complete fabrication.

Dean Alioto has since contributed an explanation for the two recordings.

Now this is what he said:

Quote
Here is the whole unedited strange story of how my 1989 $6,500 video entitled UFO Abduction became the UPN special, Alien Abduction: Incident In Lake County.

In 1988 I was headed for my 25th birthday and I had not yet made my first feature film — this 25th year mark is crucial for most filmmakers as it was the age that, Orson Wells, Coppola, Scorsese, Spielberg all had made their first films by. Unlike them, I had a budget that equaled the size of craft service for a day on a studio feature film. One night after reading the latest books on the UFO phenomenon (Communion, Missing Time, and the books of Jacques Vale), I came up with the idea of making the most realistic movie on UFO abduction ever made. The best part of the idea was that it could be done for my miniscule budget. I wrote an outline of twenty action beats based on the claimed abduction experience. I hired a group of skilled improve actors, except for myself who played the 16 year old shooting the video, and shot the direct-to-video movie in one night, in one continuous take, on 8mm video. The guy who created the UFO craft and aliens has since gone on to be the production designer for the recent live-action Scooby-Doo films — Bill Boes.

Here’s where things get “strange”. The video actually got distributed. However, a few months later the distribution company burned to the ground. I lost my 1 inch master tape and all of my artwork, leaving me with my original tapes and a 3/4 inch copy. I figured, “Oh, well — time to move on” and forgot about my first attempt at a feature film. Five years later, 1994, I begin getting calls from Unsolved Mysteries, Hard Copy, and a show called Encounters. They all want to know if I knew who had found some mysterious UFO tape that had been passed around the UFO community for the past five years. The tape, without a title or credits, was believed by many people to be real footage of an alien abduction.

When I finally stopped laughing and told them no one had found the tape, that I had made it and own the rights, they told me what my little video had been up to. Apparently, someone — much more crafty than myself — had made an edited bootleg copy of my video and injected it into the UFO community, hyping it all the way to the 1993 International UFO Congress Convention where it brought the house down. A Lieutenant Colonel with 40 years military intelligence, who was on the panel at the convention, determined right there that the tape was real! When I tried to ascertain how all this happened no one was able to find “patient zero” — the person who bootlegged the tape. I was aware that a few sample copies were made in 1989 by the distributor, before the company was burned, and that these copies were sent out to a few mom and pop video stores around the country. That’s was it.

After I was interviewed on Encounters (by the same guy that would go on to produce Alien Autopsy), and the local news, Mr. American Bandstand, Dick Clark, would enter into this strange story. In 1995 I got hired to direct on a crime reenactment series called US Customs: Classified. There, I became friends with Paul Chitlik, the head writer. Paul had heard me mention the tape once and insisted I let him see the video. After I finally got around to showing it to him (I delayed giving it to him because, at the time, I was a little too embarrassed to show him something that wasn’t as slick as my current directing samples), he told me he could get us a made-for-TV movie deal with the video. I laughed at him and flippantly said “Yeah, okay, Paul. I want a story by credit, you can write the teleplay, I’ll direct it, and we can produce it together.” He said okay and a week later we had a deal at Dick Clark to remake my little first feature. A year and a half later of turn-around nightmares at Showtime we ended up at UPN.

This time around I had a $1.2 million dollar budget and the guys from The X-Files were creating our space ship and aliens. Like in my original, we used little kids to play the aliens. We shot the remake in Vancouver in a week — the first ever made-for-TV movie shot in 5 days. We did twenty minute takes and floated three weather balloons with lights in them above the house set so I could shoot 360 degrees without seeing a light. I directed the whole movie from a small remote camera monitor in a room in the back of the house. I gave camera directions to the cameraman and the actors followed preset precise blocking movements, like a play. I have to admit it was a blast. We came in $300,000 under budget and left feeling like we had created the most original alien story since Orson Well’s version of H.G. Welles’ War Of The Worlds. Then the you-know-what hit the fan.

While we were up in Canada making our movie, Paramount replaced all of the big execs at UPN. This sucks especially hard if you’re a creator of a show that the new execs didn’t green light. It is the ritual of all new execs to piss on the tree they didn’t plant. I heard from the head of TV movies guy that the first big exec screening of Alien Abduction (which still had the imaginative title of The McPherson Tapes) was the worst screening of his career. The big boys were actually throwing food at the screen! A decision was reached by Dick Clark productions and UPN to dump Paul and I and bring in someone else to cut the movie down to one-hour and add several new interviews, one of them was poor Stanton Friedman. They ended up having to pay myself and Paul union damages for cutting us out. However, the worst thing they did was to remove the commercial bumper tags which were to read, “The program you are watching is fictional”, like the ones used on the CBS movie Special Bulletin. This caused much outrage in the UFO community and even incited a nation wide boycott of UPN.

The last laugh would be enjoyed by myself however. The show aired and became the highest rated show ever for UPN’s Tuesday primetime slot. Their website, which normally receives 10,000 hits a day, got 300,000 hits during the hour that the show aired. It was a hit! When they put back more of my abduction footage for the second showing they pulled in more great numbers and ended up with 1.3 million website hits! Another satisfying note is that my two-hour TV movie version was the one that was distributed in Europe. It has amassed quite a following and I still, five years later, get occasional e-mails from places like Denmark, asking about the movie. The original UFO Abduction has gone on to air on a Japanese Unsolved Mysteries type show and won them the best primetime network ratings for the week, even beating out ER.

http://www.badmovieplanet.com/3btheater/a/alienabductionII.html

What is interesting that if they were actors they preformed it better then some high paid actors(and he had budget of 6000$ for the original tape, with lower budget better actors, I don’t think so) and you can see that in remake that these guys are real actors and here are their names:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0142074/

What is interesting is why thee aren’t names of of actors in original tape, and he said they used children to act greys, and these children must have been one great actors if they could act greys in such a way, and from where he could get so many good kid actors, 4-5 kids(3 plus 1 grey and little girl)?What is suspicious to me is also his story that distribution company burned down, what is a possibility that something like that happens? Maybe tape is real and his story and remake is cover up( C’s said people would explode if they found out the truth, and people are left confused with these story and that is exactly what would PTB want if the story is true) and maybe he is telling the truth, but really i don’t know! I would like to hear your opinions!

Note: The above section is from the Cassiopaea Forum >>

Advertisement
Comments

Aliens & UFO's

Quantum physicist makes impressive predictions about UFOs

A “time capsule of the mind” by the physicist Deep Prasad serves as a kind of mission statement for an in-depth exploration of technology related to unexplained sightings of UFOs on the west coast of the United States.

Quantum physicist makes impressive predictions about UFOs

Prasad, vice president of technology at UAP Expedition Group and CEO of ReactiveQ, expects big things to happen in the next 5 to 10 years. The synopsis of what he is trying to do appears on the site Medium.com.

He predicts that “we will discover that we are not alone in the universe.” But it goes beyond that. Before he even lists 10 points he intends to explore, he insinuates about an agenda to find out the truth he seeks:

If it turns out that a secret group of humans has surpassed every single country, military capability and private industry on the planet in an insurmountable leap, we will report.

His predictions suggest that he has a different understanding of what extraterrestrial life means, using the alien term “for lack of a better word.”

The website Mystery wire previously reported the emergence of UAP Expedition Group in the UFO research scenario. The composition of the group includes people who were on board the USS Princeton at the time of the Tic Tac UFO report, which was reported by New York Times in December 2017 and recognized as ‘real’ by the US Navy earlier this year. The Dave Fravor’s Navy Commander’s visual observation in 2004 off the coast near San Diego sparked interest in understanding UFOs.

The group told the vice.com that aims to exploit technology to revolutionize travel.

The website punkrockandufos.com interviewed Prasad in June. He explained his interest in the topic then. The article states:

The young innovation star is also an avid UFO advocate; He is one of us.

Below are the impressive predictions of quantum physicist Deep Prasad, followed by a video of his interview on the channel. Townhall media:

  1. We will find that we are not alone in the universe.
  2. This will become a familiar fact sometime in the next 5 to 10 years. Some will naturally debate this, no matter how much science and evidence is presented. After all, we still have people who believe in Terra Plana to this day.
  3. We will find that the engineers of these advanced technologies are not human, but they are NOT extraterrestrial as we define them.
  4. We will find that words like extraterrestrial, ultra-terrestrial, and interdimensional are inaccurate descriptions of what the beings behind these UFOs really are. From what I have seen in terms of data, it seems that the answer will be complicated, if not totally impossible to fully understand with our current knowledge of physics and philosophy.
  5. We will find that an unfortunate amount of human mythology and folklore is the result of intelligent nonhumans messing with holographic technology for some unknown reason.
  6. Let’s find out much, much more about ourselves, who and what we really are.
  7. Such revelations will shock virtually every living sentient person. Depress some while releasing others (I would bet more…).
  8. Finally, there will be communication between human civilization and alien civilization, for lack of a better word, once enough humans are psychologically ready for the first contact.
  9. UFOs will be formally recognized as a valid doctoral and masters topic in the fields of Quantum Information, Quantum Gravity, Condensed Matter Physics, High Energy Physics, Sociology, History, Literature, Engineering and even Biology.
  10. Sometimes things we cannot change, end up changing us.

Source

Continue Reading

Aliens & UFO's

Scientific study reveals: Alien Artificial Structures are found on the dark side of the Moon

The Society for Planetary SETI Research (SPSR) has published a report in which it states that the mysterious structures found on the dark side of the Moon may have been built by alien races, so not of human origin.

A scientific study presented in Journal of Space Exploration found several anomalous structures on the hidden face of the Moon. Some scientists claim that unusual structures on the Moon are artificial and are not the result of any natural processes known. So if mother nature did not create these enigmatic structures, and human beings have not yet traveled to the opposite side of the moon, who created them?

This scientific study published by members of the Society for Planetary SETI Research refers to some unusual features on the far side of the Moon and specifically in the Paracelsus C crater.

The study entitled Analysis of Unusual Structures on the Far Side of the Moon in the Crater Paracelsus C argues that unusual structures are artificial in nature, and are not the result of any known natural processes on the Moon. So we reiterate: If these mysterious structures were not created by natural processes and not even by human beings who never went to the opposite side of the Moon, who was able to create them?

The truth is that similar reports have been made over the years. NASA knows a lot about what exists on the Moon and has never said how things are. One of the first people to talk about the strange structures on the Moon is Georga Leonard, in a book written in 1976 with the title Someone else is on the moon.

5 years later, Fred Steckling published another book, We discovered alien bases on the moon, with curious details about the mysterious formations existing on the lunar surface.

As noted by the experts in the scientific study published a few years ago, we say: Huge amounts of lunar and planetary images are available to the public via the Internet. While allowing for a civilian ‘scientific approach’ to SETI, the availability of so much data also tends to generate new ‘discoveries’ on a regular basis by those who want to discover something like alien bases, towers, buildings and other activities on the surface of the moon.

Although most of these results reveal image aberrations due to the cameras, compression / transmission image errors, improvement of image artifacts, or simply misconceptions of the unusual surface features imprinted in an unusual way, some of these formations remain inexplicable.

Definitely, the mainstream conservatives of the scientific institution often reject anomalies that are based on the subject matter, that is, there can be no alien artifacts on the Moon because there are no alien artifacts on the moon (or other planets). This view is an example of circular reasoning, based on the belief that there are no extraterrestrials or, if they exist, that they could not have traveled in our solar system “.

If we take a look at recent history, we will face the Clementine mission and comments made by Dr. John Brandenburg, who has a Ph.D. in plasma physics, and working as a consultant at Morningstar Applied Physics LLC, and how part-time instructor of Astronomy, Physics, Mathematics at Madison College. Dr. Brandenburg is convinced that NASA’s Clementine mission to the Moon was a joint space project with US military agencies. For example, the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO) participated together with NASA to do some research on the Moon. The Clementine mission is important because it found water on some craters on the hidden side of the Moon.

Dr. Brandenburg says: “It was the Clementine mission to take  reconnaissance photos during the mission, basically to check if someone was building bases on the Moon that we don’t know. Of all the photos I have seen of the Moon that show possible structures, the most impressive is the image of a broad, mile long rectangular structure. This seemed unmistakably artificial, and should not be there. When someone in the defense space community looked at this structure on the moon, said with great concern: That thing is not ours … there is no way we could build such a thing. It means that someone else is up there. ”

Dr. Brandenburg also stated that, once the Clementine mission was completed, the images taken from the Moon were analyzed by “a team” of an elite department that possessed the maximum document “security clearance”: “… Essentially these people have kept the photographic documents and Clementine’s analyzes hidden and as soon as they did their job they told us not to interfere with them …”. It is interesting to note that Brandenburg also stated: “We were aware that there was a possibility of an unknown presence, perhaps alien / extraterrestrial near Earth …”.

On one occasion Brandenburg said: “… I find myself sitting in a room of retired generals from both the army and the aviation and with a couple of admirals we were looking at what appeared to be a gunfight in space. The older general … turned to me and said, “Where do you think they come from?” And I said: I don’t know, sir, I heard that I’m 40 light years from here. ” But Brandenburg, who was heavily criticized for his comments and views on the Aliens, was not the only one who spoke of alien life.

Returning to the scientific study presented in a Pdf document, this team of scientists analyzed different images taken at different times on the Moon, with different Sun angles, which allowed experts to predict an approximate shape of unusual structures, using different models of computer. The 3D representation allowed them to recreate how the objects appear in their localization within the south-western quadrant of the Paracelsus C crater, which has an area of ​​about 25 kilometers in diameter.

The researchers concluded:

“Based on the evidence presented in this document, we believe that this area of ​​Paracelsus C crater is a candidate worthy of a future study of orbital missions and surface rovers. Both features analyzed in this area are statistically different from the surrounding terrain. This is a structure that differs from any characteristic view of the Moon to date. Its relationship with the surrounding land suggests an entrance and a corridor that can lead to an underground base and the 3D tests tell us that there are signs of excavation on both sides of the crater “.

Continue Reading

Aliens & UFO's

Alien Abductions: extraterrestrial implants found in some patients undergoing surgery

Most implants or microchips identified in the body of those who claim to have been abducted by aliens, are similar: they are smaller than the head of a screw, and have always been found on the same part of the “abductees”, both in the head and on other parts of the body.

Dr. Roger Leir (who died in 2014) a podiatrist from Thousand Oaks, California, founder of FIRST (Fund for Interactive Research and Space Technology) and Dr. Derrel Sims, C.Ht., R.H.A., a certified hypnotherapist and co-founder of FIRST and experienced UFO Investigator of over 27 year, are the best known specialists in the world in the research and study of alien implants: The first was a prestigious specialist in foot surgery as well as a follower of the UFO phenomenon from a young age. When for the first, he saw an X-ray with an abnormal graft time belonging to one of his patients, he specialized in this phenomenon, through the recovery of more than 20 abductee implants, extracting this technology from his patients, recording all his tests and surgical interventions.

The objects extracted by Dr. Leir produced a surprising result: while they were still inside the patient, the objects maintained an anomalous magnetism, and while extracted they adhered to surgical instruments, and then disappeared once the extraction had been performed. 

The result of surgery

Dr. Leir, reported on these surgeries:

“The findings of these implant surgeries are highly unusual. In all these cases, there was virtually no inflammatory response.” This is not the usual finding in foreign tissue reactions. Normally, foreign bodies embedded in tissues result in some type of acute or chronic inflammatory response, and may include fibrosis and cyst formation. Such was not the case here. The pathology reports of the first two surgeries revealed that the metallic objects were encased in a very dense, tough, grey membrane consisting of proteinaceous coagulum, hemoseridin and pure keratin. More simply, blood protein and skin cells that are usually found in the superficial layer of the skin. The tough, biological “cocoons” encasing the implants were also found to contain nerve proprioceptors – nerve and pressure cells of the wrong tissue type for that part of the body. These implant cocoons also fluoresced a bright green color in the presence of an ultraviolet light source.

The implants therefore lacked the expected inflammatory response in the operations, according to the pathological reports. The device removed by one foot, in the most recent surgical intervention, also lacked the resistant gray outer membrane: the results on the first series of grafts also revealed that the metal devices are of “meteoric” origin, with as many as eleven different elements analyzed in the content.

Derrel Sims commented on the uncommon, non-rejecting human response to the implants: “It seems that the dense fibrous membrane may have been the person’s own surface skin. If this is the case, it appears that the metallic objects are wrapped in a sheath of keratinaceous material (surface skin). Nerve fibers then surround the tissue and appear to be attached to larger nerves. The fact that both persons (from the first set of surgeries) objected verbally and physically could be an indication of this (nervous system) connection.

Mr. Sims believes the indications are very strong that these implants are extraterrestrial in origin. “But”, Mr. Sims concedes, “Whatever the scientists say who have examined the objects say, is what we will say.”

Derrel Sims has stated that a scientific peer review of all tests must be done before more specifics can be released. This is the standard course of action taken in any scientific endeavor: A series of simple questions were posed to each of the participants. When asked as to how and when their implants might have been inserted, Pat Parrinellio from Houston, Texas believed his implant could have been inserted during a UFO encounter he had in 1954, at six years of age . Mary Jones recalls two UFO encounters when her metallic objects could have been implanted, in 1969. “In the first frightening UFO encounter”, Mary commented, “I was on a camping trip with my family while pregnant with my third child.” Oddly enough, one month after Mary’s child was born, she had another alien encounter while at home during the night. Conversely, Dorothy O’Hara from Palm Springs, California and Licia Davidson also from California both replied, “I have no idea when the object was inserted.” Alice Leavy commented that she first noticed the lump on her leg following a UFO encounter involving other witnesses in San Diego, in 1993. “I actually noticed the lump” Alice clarified, “when I discovered the scoop mark also on my left leg, after the UFO encounter.”

The facilities

They almost always have a behavior that seems to be intelligent, they live through the blood of the ‘hosts’, in addition to adopting their DNA through biological membranes. When they are in human tissue, the implants are surrounded by an unusual and strong coating composed of proteins and keratin. This type of coating adapts to DNA, through biological membranes: This prevents rejection by the body, since it does not produce any immune response; moreover, it is such a rigid material that it cannot be cut by a hardened steel scalpel, but only with a laser. So far, no prosthetic or medical implant has been built with this material.

The devices are located in areas of the body, such as the back of the hand or in the jaw: some of them emit FM electromagnetic radiation signals at 93 MHz, 15 MHz and even frequencies used in space satellite communications before they are removed. The surface coating they possess is sensitive to phonons, apparently used for the purpose of retransmitting sound waves. They have also been found to include Singlewalled carbon nano tubes: Steve Colbern, a scientist specializing in chemical materials and nanotechnologies, admits he has never seen such advanced surgical technology on the planet.

An alien implant extracted from Dr. Derrel Sims. The implants are surrounded by an unusual and strong coating composed of proteins and keratin

Moreover, they are almost always composed of meteoric iron, cobalt and iridium, and some also contain orthorhombic crystal structures of sodium chloride and boron. The isotopic relationships they show are not found on Earth, but a similar structure was found in a meteorite formed by nickel and iron.

The implants have been examined by many of the most important laboratories in the world, such as Los Alamos, in New Mexico, where it is concluded that their nature is weathering, since the metal isotopes they contain were not found on Earth. The metallurgy laboratory of the University of San Diego, California, concluded that the metal isotopes were “extraterrestrial”.

Continue Reading

Recent Comments

Trending