Connect with us


9/11 Victims Family Members Search For The Truth Brought To Life In An Off-Broadway Play

If there is a better example of art imitating life for today’s awakening community than ‘A Blanket of Dust,’ I don’t know of it. Of course many dramatic works of the past–those of Checkov and Tolstoy come to mind–contained shrewdly veiled exposures of the existing order, which served as a healing salve for the audience. Perhaps in our society we are not quite as restricted as in those totalitarian regimes of the past, but the TRUTH behind events has never in history been so meticulously, bureaucratically, and technologically hidden from us as it is now.

And so, with the announcement of a new Off-Broadway play set in the immediate aftermath of the destruction of the three towers in New York on September 11th, 2001, we have the opportunity to live vicariously through the protagonist in her relentless search for the truth.

Here is a description of the play from the Flea Theatre’s promo page:

A Blanket of Dust is a political thriller and a new addition to the Theater of Resistance.  It is the story of Diana Crane, a modern day Antigone.  The daughter of a US Senator whose husband has died in the World Trade Center, her subsequent ordeal in seeking justice for his murder ultimately drives her to the outer fringes of society.  Struggling with facts that the government, the media, her family and her countrymen deny, she finally confronts them all with a harrowing act of sacrificial tragedy.

Unintended Impact Of The 9/11 Plan

The initial effect on human consciousness of the 9/11 tragedy was what the planners had intended–though with only limited success. It made modern Americans feel vulnerable in a way that had never happened before, and certainly there was plenty of anger on the part of some citizens that was fed into the narrative that this was an outside incursion from the Arab world that called for military revenge.

However, it was not long after the smoke had cleared that a different impact on human consciousness was felt–one which began to see through the fog–and the intentions–of those that hold power over official narrative. It didn’t help them that 9/11 was somewhat of a botched job, with inconsistencies, errors in execution, and ridiculously obvious tactics–like the planting of a fully intact passport of one of the ‘hijackers’ amidst the rubble of molten steel and eviscerated human bodies.

But it was not just screw-ups in execution that has spawn an opposition to the official story that rivals the long-standing ‘conspiracy theories’ (read: ‘facts’) about the assassination of John F. Kennedy. It is our growing awakening, and the keening of our powers of discernment that are at play here. As globalist Zbigniew Brzezinski warned, ‘For the first time in history almost all of humanity is politically activated, politically conscious and politically interactive.’

17 Years Later

And so here we are, 17 years later, still talking about the event, questioning the official narrative in ever-growing numbers, with an insatiable thirst for the truth behind these events that we KNOW has been hidden from us.

‘A Blanket of Dust’ is timely in the sense that our healing from 9/11 never really took place, as is evidenced by the number of victims family members who continue to gather together and press for the truth, despite the pain that it evokes. One such member is Bob McIlvaine, who lost his son on 9/11 and has been a vocal advocate for an independent investigation ever since. Bob reflects in this video on the importance of ‘A Blanket of Dust’:

The importance of the play is…my feelings about 9/11 are in that play: the absolute frustration of someone who lived through it…she’s trying to tell the world that 9/11 was a false flag, that the government was involved in it. And her father is in the Senate, and she can’t get anywhere with that. And she didn’t know what to do with her frustration.

I’ve had that opportunity, my frustration <went into> being part of the peace movement. And it gives you satisfaction. But the thing is, when push comes to shove, you still have that agony, the depression of what happened. And no one knows what the real answer is. And no one’s solved it, or looking to solve it.

What Diane was trying to do in the play <was> reveal who murdered her husband. And that’s the only thing I want. And I don’t care if anybody’s punished, I don’t think she was looking for punishment or anything. Just tell the truth. We haven’t gotten the truth of what happened. And millions of people have died because of that. And that’s the true beauty of ‘A Blanket of Dust.’

Source link



Yes, fear is the power of control

“… The young devil to the old:

– How did you manage to send so many souls to hell?

Old devil:

– Through fear!


– Well done! And what were they afraid of? Wars? Hunger?


– No … Disease!


– They weren’t sick? Weren’t they dying? Wasn’t there a medicine?


-….. got sick. They died. There was a cure …


– I do not understand…


– We accidentally decided that the only thing that needs to be preserved at any cost is LIFE !!!

They stopped hugging … They stopped greeting each other !!! They left all human contact …. They left everything that made a person human!

They were left without money. They lost their jobs.

But they chose to fear for their lives, even if they didn’t have bread to eat.

They believed what they heard, read the newspapers and blindly believed everything they read.

They gave up freedom.

They never left the house again. They never went anywhere. We never visited friends and family again. The whole world has turned into a huge prison with convicts – volunteers.

They accepted everything !!! All this to live another miserable day …

They didn’t live, they died every day!

It was too easy to take their pitiful soul … “

Clive Lewis “Letters from a Senior to a Junior Devil”.

From the book “Balamut’s Letters” (1941)

Continue Reading


Havana Syndrome again? CIA officers are mowed down by a mysterious disease

A CIA officer in Moscow experienced symptoms of the so-called “Havana syndrome” in 2017. This became known to The New York Times with reference to sources in diplomatic circles.

CIA officer Mark Polimepulos, who helped lead covert operations in Russia and Europe, complained about the manifestation of mysterious symptoms. According to the newspaper, in December 2017, he felt severe dizziness, which later developed into a prolonged migraine, forcing him to retire. At that time, Polymerpoulos was 48 years old.

It is noted that such a case was not the only one. Similar symptoms were experienced by the staff of the American ambassadors in Cuba and China in 2016-2018. However, the exact number of cases and the place where this happened is not named. It is alleged that the US diplomats have tried to influence in a similar way around the world.

At the same time, the US State Department was unable to establish an unambiguous reason that caused the “Havana syndrome.” Among other things, it was assumed that the diplomats may have been exposed to an unidentified sound effect.

In 2017, it was reported that, beginning in late 2016, American diplomatic officials and their relatives in Cuba began to complain of symptoms such as hearing loss, nausea, headaches and balance disorder. 

The Associated Press received audio footage of the attack and described the harassing sounds as “the high-pitched sound of crickets combined with fingernails scratching on a board.” Then the American government suggested that Russia or China could be the culprit.

Many victims are still undergoing rehabilitation. Specialists from the University of Pennsylvania performed magnetic resonance imaging and revealed visible changes in the structure of the brain in the diplomatic missions.

Differences were found in 23 men and 17 women who complained of health problems while on diplomatic duties in Havana. Scientists have yet to figure out what causes the unusual symptoms.

Continue Reading


How Russia and the United States nearly started a nuclear war in 1995

The Norwegian meteorological rocket incident remains the only time in history that the Russian president has activated his nuclear briefcase.

On January 25, 1995, Doomsday could have come in the world: the Russian Federation was preparing to launch a nuclear strike on the United States. How did it come about that the states that left the confrontation of the Cold War in the past and had just normalized relations with each other found themselves on the verge of mutual destruction?

The beginning of the war?

The cause of the crisis was an ordinary Norwegian meteorological rocket. Its launch from the small island of Anneia at 7 am local time (10 am Moscow time) towards Spitsbergen caused a stir in Russia. 

Black Brant XII.

Black Brant XII. Legion Media / ZUMA Press

Equipped with scientific equipment to study the aurora borealis, the Black Brant XII was similar in size to the nuclear-powered American Trident D-5 ballistic missile, intended for launch from submarines. In addition, it flew along a trajectory along which, as the Russian Defense Ministry believed, American missiles would fly in the event of a nuclear war. 

In December 1994, Norway informed 28 states, including Russia, about the planned launch, but did not give a specific date, limiting itself to specifying the period: from January 15 to February 10 of the next year. Due to bureaucratic delays, this information did not reach the Russian Missile Warning System, which sounded the alarm.

Decisive minutes

An emergency meeting with the country’s top political and military leadership was convened in the Kremlin. Defense Minister Pavel Grachev, Chief of the General Staff Mikhail Kolesnikov and President of the Russian Federation (as Supreme Commander-in-Chief) Boris Yeltsin had three strategic missile forces control terminals activated – the so-called nuclear suitcases.

Vladimir Sayapin / TASS

The military believed the lone missile could have been fired to create an electromagnetic pulse that knocked out Russian radars and communications systems. Following it, a massive blow could be expected.

For several tense minutes, as leaders watched it flight, it was decided whether Russia would launch a nuclear strike against the United States. 

“Little is known today about what Yeltsin said at the time, given that it could have been some of the most dangerous moments in the entire history of the nuclear era,” The Washington Post journalist, David Hoffman wrote three years after the incident : “They make it clear that the Cold War nuclear readiness system continues to operate, and how catastrophic its consequences could be, despite the fact that the feud between the great powers is already over.”   

The situation was discharged only when it became clear that the rocket had gone towards Spitsbergen (not far from which it fell into the ocean). The nuclear cases have been deactivated. Russian President Boris Yeltsin (center) and Russian Defense Minister Pavel Grachev (right).

Russian President Boris Yeltsin (center) and Russian Defense Minister Pavel Grachev (right). Igor Mikhalev / Sputnik

The incident with bringing Russia’s Strategic Nuclear Forces to combat readiness, soon became the property of the world community. When, four years later, the Norwegians were about to repeat their launch of Black Brant XII and reported this to the Russian Foreign Ministry, the US additionally warned all key Russian military departments about it through their channels. As a result, this time there were no unpleasant surprises. 


Continue Reading