Connect with us

Apocalypse & Armageddon

22 Reasons Why Starting World War 3 In The Middle East Is A Really Bad Idea

While most of the country is obsessing over Miley Cyrus, the Obama administration is preparing a military attack against Syria which has the potential of starting World War 3. In fact, it was previously reported that cruise missile strikes could begin “as early as Thursday“. The Obama administration is pledging that the strikes will be “limited”, but what happens when the Syrians fight back? What happens if they sink a U.S. naval vessel or they have agents start hitting targets inside the United States? Then we would have a full-blown war on our hands.

22 Reasons Why Starting World War 3 In The Middle East Is A Really Bad Idea - A Tactical Tomahawk Cruise Missile launches from the forward missile deck aboard the guided-missile destroyer USS Farragut (DDG 99)

And what happens if the Syrians decide to retaliate by hitting Israel? If Syrian missiles start raining down on Tel Aviv, Israel will be extremely tempted to absolutely flatten Damascus, and they are more than capable of doing precisely that. And of course Hezbollah and Iran are not likely to just sit idly by as their close ally Syria is battered into oblivion.

We are looking at a scenario where the entire Middle East could be set aflame, and that might only be just the beginning. Russia and China are sternly warning the U.S. government not to get involved in Syria, and by starting a war with Syria we will do an extraordinary amount of damage to our relationships with those two global superpowers.

Could this be the beginning of a chain of events that could eventually lead to a massive global conflict with Russia and China on one side and the United States on the other? Of course it will not happen immediately, but I fear that what is happening now is setting the stage for some really bad things. The following are 22 reasons why starting World War 3 in the Middle East is a really bad idea…

#1 The American people are overwhelmingly against going to war with Syria…

Americans strongly oppose U.S. intervention in Syria’s civil war and believe Washington should stay out of the conflict even if reports that Syria’s government used deadly chemicals to attack civilians are confirmed, a Reuters/Ipsos poll says.

About 60 percent of Americans surveyed said the United States should not intervene in Syria’s civil war, while just 9 percent thought President Barack Obama should act.

#2 At this point, a war in Syria is even more unpopular with the American people than Congress is.

#3 The Obama administration has not gotten approval to go to war with Syria from Congress as the U.S. Constitution requires.

#4 The United States does not have the approval of the United Nations to attack Syria and it is not going to be getting it.

#5 Syria has said that it will use “all means available” to defend itself if the United States attacks. Would that include terror attacks in the United States itself?

#6 Syrian Foreign Minister Walid Muallem made the following statement on Tuesday

“We have two options: either to surrender, or to defend ourselves with the means at our disposal. The second choice is the best: we will defend ourselves”

#7 Russia has just sent their most advanced anti-ship missiles to Syria. What do you think would happen if images of sinking U.S. naval vessels were to come flashing across our television screens?

#8 When the United States attacks Syria, there is a very good chance that Syria will attack Israel. Just check out what one Syrian official said recently

A member of the Syrian Ba’ath national council Halef al-Muftah, until recently the Syrian propaganda minister’s aide, said on Monday that Damascus views Israel as “behind the aggression and therefore it will come under fire” should Syria be attacked by the United States.

In an interview for the American radio station Sawa in Arabic, President Bashar Assad’s fellow party member said: “We have strategic weapons and we can retaliate. Essentially, the strategic weapons are aimed at Israel.”

Al-Muftah stressed that the US’s threats will not influence the Syrain regime and added that “If the US or Israel err through aggression and exploit the chemical issue, the region will go up in endless flames, affecting not only the area’s security, but the world’s.”

#9 If Syria attacks Israel, the consequences could be absolutely catastrophic. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is promising that any attack will be responded to “forcefully“…

“We are not a party to this civil war in Syria but if we identify any attempt to attack us we will respond and we will respond forcefully”

#10 Hezbollah will likely do whatever it can to fight for the survival of the Assad regime. That could include striking targets inside both the United States and Israel.

#11 Iran’s closest ally is Syria. Will Iran sit idly by as their closest ally is removed from the chessboard?

#12 Starting a war with Syria will cause significant damage to our relationship with Russia. On Tuesday, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said that the West is acting like a “monkey with a hand grenade“.

#13 Starting a war with Syria will cause significant damage to our relationship with China. And what will happen if the Chinese decide to start dumping the massive amount of U.S. debt that it is holding? Interest rates would absolutely skyrocket and we would rapidly be facing a nightmare scenario.

#14 Dr. Jerome Corsi and Walid Shoebat have compiled some startling evidence that it was actually the Syrian rebels that the U.S. is supporting that were responsible for the chemical weapons attack that is being used as justification to go to war with Syria…

With the assistance of former PLO member and native Arabic-speaker Walid Shoebat, WND has assembled evidence from various Middle Eastern sources that cast doubt on Obama administration claims the Assad government is responsible for last week’s attack.

You can examine the evidence for yourself right here.

#15 As Pat Buchanan recently noted, it would have made absolutely no sense for the Assad regime to use chemical weapons on defenseless women and children. The only people who would benefit from such an attack would be the rebels…

The basic question that needs to be asked about this horrific attack on civilians, which appears to be gas related, is: Cui bono?

To whose benefit would the use of nerve gas on Syrian women and children redound? Certainly not Assad’s, as we can see from the furor and threats against him that the use of gas has produced.

The sole beneficiary of this apparent use of poison gas against civilians in rebel-held territory appears to be the rebels, who have long sought to have us come in and fight their war.

#16 If the Saudis really want to topple the Assad regime, they should do it themselves. They should not expect the United States to do their dirty work for them.

#17 A former commander of U.S. Central Command has said that a U.S. attack on Syria would result in “a full-throated, very, very serious war“.

#18 A war in the Middle East will be bad for the financial markets. The Dow was down about 170 points today and concern about war with Syria was the primary reason.

#19 A war in the Middle East will cause the price of oil to go up. On Tuesday, the price of U.S. oil rose to about $109 a barrel.

#20 There is no way in the world that the U.S. government should be backing the Syrian rebels. As I discussed a few days ago, the rebels have pledged loyalty to al-Qaeda, they have beheaded numerous Christians and they have massacred entire Christian villages. If the U.S. government helps these lunatics take power in Syria it will be a complete and utter disaster.

#21 A lot of innocent civilians inside Syria will end up getting killed. Already, a lot of Syrians are expressing concern about what “foreign intervention” will mean for them and their families…

“I’ve always been a supporter of foreign intervention, but now that it seems like a reality, I’ve been worrying that my family could be hurt or killed,” said one woman, Zaina, who opposes Assad. “I’m afraid of a military strike now.”

“The big fear is that they’ll make the same mistakes they made in Libya and Iraq,” said Ziyad, a man in his 50s. “They’ll hit civilian targets, and then they’ll cry that it was by mistake, but we’ll get killed in the thousands.”

#22 If the U.S. government insists on going to war with Syria without the approval of the American people, the U.S. Congress or the United Nations, we are going to lose a lot of friends and a lot of credibility around the globe. It truly is a sad day when Russia looks like “the good guys” and we look like “the bad guys”.

What good could possibly come out of getting involved in Syria? As I wrote about the other day, the “rebels” that Obama is backing are rabidly anti-Christian, rabidly anti-Israel and rabidly anti-western. If they take control of Syria, that nation will be far more unstable and far more of a hotbed for terrorism than it is now.

And the downside of getting involved in Syria is absolutely enormous. Syria, Iran and Hezbollah all have agents inside this country, and if they decide to start blowing stuff up that will wake up the American people to the horror of war really quick. And by attacking Syria, the United States could cause a major regional war to erupt in the Middle East which could eventually lead to World War 3.

I don’t know about you, but I think that starting World War 3 in the Middle East is a really bad idea. Let us hope that cooler heads prevail before things spin totally out of control.

Source: The Economic Collapse Blog via True Activist

Apocalypse & Armageddon

US shows laser weapon test against drones

The US showed a test by the US military in the Pacific Ocean of laser weapons against drones. The video was posted on  the USNI News Video YouTube channel.

The frames show the ship, on the bow of which the installation was placed. The video also showed the laser itself (bright beam), which is directed along the surface of the water. After that, the unmanned aerial vehicle lights up.

The tests took place on May 16 aboard the landing ship USS Portland near the base of Pearl Harbor. The command of the American Pacific Fleet specified that the military tested the so-called Solid State Laser Weapons System Demonstrator.

In April 2019, the U.S. Air Force used a ground-based prototype laser system to successfully destroy several air launch rockets.

Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the development of a combat laser system in March 2018 during a message to the Federal Assembly. According to the head of state, “the presence of such combat complexes expands Russia’s capabilities in its security sphere”.

In October 2018, the director of the Center for the Analysis of World Trade in Arms Igor Korotchenko said that the Russian combat laser complex “ Peresvet ” effectively works against industrial and artisan drones only in “ideal conditions”.

Continue Reading

Apocalypse & Armageddon

Rivers, ponds and even rains turn red all over the world

Reports that rivers, rains and ponds turn red around the world have shocked biblical scholars who warn that this phenomenon is a sign that we have reached the end of time, as predicted in the Book of Revelation.

One photographer described the reddened Nahal-Alexander River as “the biblical bloody plague in Egypt.”

The Alexander River flows across the entire width of Israel, from the hills of Nablus in the West Bank to the sea. This river is loved for its wildlife and beauty, but in recent weeks it looks filled with blood.

According to Wikipedia, the river is named after Tsar Alexander Yannaya, who ruled in Judea in the 1st century BC. e. . It originates in the mountains of Samaria, that is, in Palestine, then crosses Israel, flows into the Mediterranean Sea and serves as a pilgrimage place for vacationers and tourists.

For several weeks now, several Israeli media have been publishing photographs of Red, blood-filled water.

Authorities accuse Palestinians of pouring blood from one or more Palestinian slaughterhouses in the city of Tulkarm in the north of the West Bank.

The main thing is that there is a series of prophecies, according to which one day “water will become like blood” and that this sign will become a sign of the approaching End of Times. Prior to this, the water was constantly blushing here and there, but Israel occupies a more important place in this topic, since the prophecy was given by people who, in time immemorial, roamed the desert somewhere in Israel. 

Ancient vices were unlikely to know about other countries, therefore, when the water in the river in Australia or somewhere in Canada turns red – this is one thing, and when the same thing happens in the Middle East – this is completely different. 

Rivers in China, Russia, Lebanon and the Netherlands, as well as water bodies in the United States, Australia and Sri Lanka, have recently turned blood red, according to local news channels, in some cases leaving scientists and experts at a loss.

The Molchanka River in Tyumen, Russia, turned red overnight, leaving locals worried about the quality of their drinking water, as well as worried that we had entered in recent times.

In the Dutch city of Nutdorp, the canal turned dark red, which puzzled the locals. This phenomenon prompted local residents to recall biblical prophecies about the transformation of water into blood.

“It looks like red wine,” remarked Nutdorp resident Mark Ruder in an interview with Telstar Online in the Netherlands. “It’s probably algae,” said Ruder, “but this is not happening in our region.”

David Dilling, an American living in the Netherlands who captured this strange phenomenon in the video, described the canal’s water as turning into a “blood red, biblical color.”

Biblical scholars argue that scientific explanations for this phenomenon are of secondary importance compared to the fact that God said that water would turn red at the beginning of the end of time. 

These scholars point to water-to-blood prophecies found in the Old Testament Revelation book that explain that rivers flowing in red are one of the signs of the End of Times.

The famous Australian beach Bondi has also recently turned blood red. This event, dubbed the “Raspberry Tide” in the local media, struck Sydney residents who had never seen anything like it before

The Jian River, flowing through Luoyang City, Henan Province in northern China, turned blood red.

And in Texas, Fisherman’s Lake turned red.

Pastor Paul Begley of the Knox, Indiana Community Evangelical Baptist Church. said people should pay attention.

“I am not saying that this Lake Texas is these scriptures in Revelation, but what I am saying is that Bible prophecies are slowly fulfilling in the middle of the revelation of the end of time – we should be ready to meet the future,” he said.

– God said it will rain from the blood. Keep in mind that there will be physical and scientific reasons for all this, just like the earthquake that God used to make the walls of Jericho fall. Let’s remember that God said what would happen, not necessarily how! ”

Is Pastor Begley Right? There is more and more evidence that it can be. And Sri Lanka recently experienced “rain of blood.”

Rare red showers fell over more than 15 minutes in Sevanagal, Monaragal and Manampitiya, Polonnaruwa. According to sources in the Department of Meteorology, red rain fell in these areas and the cause has not yet been established. Red rain in Sevanagal and Manampitiya left red frost on the ground. This is the first time a red rain has been witnessed in Sri Lanka.

What does the Bible say about rivers and ponds that turn red?

Prophecies about turning water into blood are contained in the Book of Revelation:

Rev. 8: 1. And when He removed the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven, as if for half an hour.

Rev. 8: 2. And I saw seven Angels who stood before God; and they were given seven trumpets.

Rev. 8: 3. And another angel came, and stood before the altar, holding a golden censer; and many incense was given to him, so that with the prayers of all the saints he would lay it on the golden altar, which is before the throne.

Rev. 8: 4. And the smoke of incense ascended with the prayers of the saints from the hand of an angel before God.

Rev. 8: 5. And the angel took the censer; and he filled it with fire from the altar, and cast it to the earth: and there were voices and thunders, and lightnings, and an earthquake.

Rev. 8: 6. And the seven Angels, having seven trumpets, prepared to blow.

Rev. 8: 7. The first angel sounded, and hail and fire were mixed with blood, and fell to the ground; and the third part of the trees burned down, and all the green grass burned down.

Rev. 8: 8. The second angel sounded a trumpet, and, as it were, a large mountain, blazing with fire, was cast into the sea; and the third part of the sea became blood,

Rev. 8: 9. and a third of the animated creatures living in the sea died, and a third of the ships perished.

Rev. 8:10. The third angel sounded and a large star fell from heaven, burning like a lamp, and fell on a third of the rivers and on the sources of water.

Rev. 8:11. The name of this star is “wormwood”; and the third part of the waters became wormwood, and many of the people died of the waters, because they became bitter.

Rev. 8:12. The fourth angel sounded, and the third part of the sun and the third part of the moon and the third part of the stars were struck, so that the third part of them was eclipsed, and the third part of the day was not bright – just like the night.

Rev. 8:13. And I saw and heard one Angel flying in the middle of heaven and speaking in a loud voice: grief, grief, grief living on the earth from the other trumpet voices of the three Angels who will blow!

Continue Reading

Apocalypse & Armageddon

Intelligence Report: China and the US begin preparations for war

soulask.com ww3

An internal Chinese report warns that after an outbreak of coronavirus, Beijing has faced a growing wave of hostility that could lead to a confrontation with the United States, people familiar with the document told Reuters. A report submitted earlier this month by the Ministry of State Security to Beijing’s top leaders, including President Xi Jinping, concluded that global anti-Chinese sentiment has reached its highest level since the crackdown on Tiananmen Square in 1989.

As a result, Beijing was faced with a wave of anti-Chinese sentiment led by the United States after the pandemic, and now, as Chinese analysts and scouts conclude, it is necessary to prepare for the worst possible scenario – a direct armed confrontation between the two superpowers. The report was compiled by the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR), an analytical center affiliated with the Ministry of State Security, the highest intelligence agency in China. Reuters was not provided with a copy of the document, however, our source is fully familiar with it in full and in full.

The official representative of the press service of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, answering a question from Reuters, denies everything: “I do not have relevant information,” he said. The Ministry of State Security of China does not have publicly available contact information, so it is not available for our requests and there are no comments from there. CICIR, an influential think tank that until 1980 was part of the Ministry of State Security and advised the Chinese government on foreign and security policy issues, also did not respond to our request for comment.

Reuters is, of course, a very respected source, however, like many global media, it reports the truth, the truth alone, and only the truth, but not the whole truth. The whole truth is that the document that Reuters reports on is a very secret document and a very narrow circle of people is familiar with it.

The likelihood that one of these persons leaked secret information to journalists is ridiculously small. Therefore, there can be only two sources:

a) US intelligence; b) Intelligence of China.

In the case of the first option, Washington simply continues to go within the framework of the course noted in the document, that is, to assemble an anti-Chinese coalition. And now, having this message from Reuters, it will be easier to push the Allies to prepare for war: upon seeing this paper everyone will be scared and the troops will begin to move.

In case b), it is the fruit by Chinese intelligence, Beijing thus simply, in its traditional manner, conveys greetings to the Americans and generally to everyone. Since the anti-Chinese sentiment is definitely somehow implicated in the Covid-19 pandemic, even in Africa, men are running after Chinese citizens with large iron-wood sticks. As a result, the Chinese leaked a document to show how they take everything seriously: that is, either love us again, or we will arrange a Third World War.

At the end, everything definitely goes to this Third World. So, only in the last three days of April, Trump signed three orders in the event of an emergency situation: an order for the continuity of power, an order to deploy reservists, an order to protect US energy networks. Besides these orders in the United States there are a number of other serious movements, each of which has a dual purpose. For example – the construction of military hospitals where necessary and where not necessary, the deployment of FEMA forces. Officially, everything is needed to fight the pandemic, but in case of war, the involved ministries and departments will do the same.

Moreover, according to rumors, US intelligence issued a paper, some time ago to the White House similar to that of the Chinese and all important officials and the military, which led to the measure of the level of tolerance that America was preparing for war.

Reuters are, of course, good guys, but they are optimistic and write about a new Cold War. However, unfortunately, there is none and will not be any Cold War: during the Cold War, the GRU, the Russian foreign military-intelligence agency, did not issue documents of this kind to the Politburo. That is, the possibility of a conflict with NATO has always been understood and implied, but there have never been papers like “you need to prepare right now.”

The Cold War is all sorts of long-term deployments, the construction of fleets, the development of missiles and aircraft with the prospect of a conflict that will not be clear when. And this Cold War has always been and is going on, as China builds ships in the hundreds, tanks and planes are put into service by the thousands. At the same time, we are now witnessing not a long-term, but a final deployment, that is, when the military has already put everything in its place and redrawn the borders. Therefore, the conflict between China and the United States is the immediate prospect and most likely it will begin before September 2, 2020.

In the light of the document received by Reuters, we can guaranteedly predict something like a revolution or a sharp change in Russia that will happen in the very near future. A possible consequence of this revolution (or change of course) will be either the beginning of the Russian-Chinese war, or the conflict of the Russian Federation with NATO.

Today, the foreign policy of the Russian Federation can be defined by the words “not fish, not meat”. On the one hand, the Washington Regional Committee decides all important issues, all the money of the state and elites in American banks, 2/3 of effective managers and other great leaders in the West have real estate, relatives and foreign passports. On the other hand, in the framework of the policy of “getting up on one’s knees” and “fastening staples”, Russia has opened borders with China – the Chinese go to Siberia in droves, they build everywhere or privatize anything they can. Along the way, they cut the forest trees, pump oil and ‘explore’ Lake Baikal. The guarantor of this state of affairs is the explicit or implicit Chinese garrisons.

In a peaceful and calm time, the situation suits everyone, however, if the confrontation between China and the USA escalates, neither Washington nor Beijing needs an ally sitting on two chairs. If the Kremlin thinks that they are there like Switzerland, that is, they will collect loot and remain neutral, then serious people will quickly explain to effective managers that the time has come for a choice. That is, either you are with us, or you are with them.

So, if Chinese tanks appear on the border of Ukraine and Belarus – it will be a war, the Americans will bomb it all. On the other hand, if Moscow informs Beijing that everything is already with the “brothers forever” and it is time to tie up Siberian resources, China will send troops and explain the situation to effective managers in a popular way. It is unknown which of the options is being implemented. Judging by the numerous prophecies about the war between Russia and China, there will be a second option and it is quite possible that it will begin in the fall.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

DO NOT MISS

Trending